Adelphia Communications Corporation – Fraud Case In the year 2002, Adelphia Communications Corporation faced a massive accounting scandal that led to company’s bankruptcy and later reorganization. This paper will attempt to identify, analyze and evaluate the consequences of misrepresentation of financial accounts on a company, industry and economic level. Moreover, it will attempt to examine factors influencing the corporate failure from an auditor’s point of view, and consider the measures that auditor could have taken in order to enable quality and completes of information communicated to external users. History: In 1952, John Rigas paid $100 for a cable TV franchise in Pennsylvania and ran it as a small family business with only 25 customers. (Bennett, Thau, Scouten, 2005) The business was expanding and in 1972, the company was officially incorporated as Adelphia Communications Corporation. Shortly after, in 1986, Adelphia started publicly trading on the NASDAQ stock exchange. In the 1990s, in the light of a weakening cable industry, Adelphia began expanding into Internet access, paging services and business telecommunications for which it used cash, stock and debt to finance numerous acquisitions. (Bennett, et al) Adelphia’s fraud was finally discovered in March 2002, when Tim Rigas, the company’s CFO revealed that Adelphia owes $2.3 billion in loans made to partnerships run by the Rigas family. This revelation resulted in SEC’s investigation that discovered fraud activities which dated as far back as mid-1999. Shortly after, all members of Rigas family resigned from Adelphia. When Adelphia’s fraud was finally discovered, in March 2002, the price of its stock went from $28 to 79 cents within a month. (Bennett, et al) Fraud ... ... middle of paper ... ... and settled the charges by paying $50 million. Although charges and wrongdoings of Deloitte auditors were never proven in court, it is quite apparent that Deloitte indeed had its share of guilt in Adelphia’s fraud. In particular, Deloitte failed to properly investigate the relationship between Rigas family and Adelphia Communications Corporation, thus providing way for fraud to take place. Moreover, Deloitte’s independence in this engagement is questionable, considering Deloitte has been the external auditor of Adelphia for over 15 years. Therefore, auditors, as crucial players and gatekeepers of any company’s financial reporting, should maintain unsurpassed independence, in fact and in appearance, as much as possible. Moreover, as effective and responsible professionals, auditors should always maintain their integrity despite any management or executive pressure.
John Rigas started Adelphia Communcations in 1952 with the help of two partners, but soon bought it out. The company was taken public in 1986 and as a result would have to abide by the regulations of the SEC. By the early 2000s, Adelphia was one of the top cable companies in the United States. This was the peak of a corporation that would begin a downward spiral over the first half of 2002 as a result of fraudulent use of the company’s assets at its’ shareholders expense. Members of the Rigas family drove the company to bankruptcy through rampant spending of company funds on personal expenditures (Barlaup, 2009). These expenditures included the likes of gross misuse of the company’s aircraft for personal trips by members of the Rigas family and the construction of a personal golf course on the family’s private land (Markon, 2002). This was accomplished after careful manipulation of the company’s reported numbers and fabrication of transactions within the company. Co-borrowing and self-dealing were commonplace in this time period that resulted in over 2 billion dollars’ worth of debt. All this was done under the nose of shareholders and culminated in an insurmountable debt that would lead the company to bankruptcy and to the imprisonment of multiple members of the Rigas family (Barlaup, 2009).
Between 1865 and 1900 technology, economic conditions, and government policy influenced American Agriculture greater than it ever had before. Technologically, Railroads, factories, and farm equipment changed American agriculture by allowing the production of farmed goods to be increased substantially, while economic conditions caused the prices of these goods to go down and then fluctuate. Farmers hurting from the economic disarray began influencing the laws being passed to help them in their economic troubles. Because of the influence of technology, government policy, and economic conditions between the 1865 and 1900 American agriculture was affected.
Throughout the past several years major corporate scandals have rocked the economy and hurt investor confidence. The largest bankruptcies in history have resulted from greedy executives that “cook the books” to gain the numbers they want. These scandals typically involve complex methods for misusing or misdirecting funds, overstating revenues, understating expenses, overstating the value of assets or underreporting of liabilities, sometimes with the cooperation of officials in other corporations (Medura 1-3). In response to the increasing number of scandals the US government amended the Sarbanes Oxley act of 2002 to mitigate these problems. Sarbanes Oxley has extensive regulations that hold the CEO and top executives responsible for the numbers they report but problems still occur. To ensure proper accounting standards have been used Sarbanes Oxley also requires that public companies be audited by accounting firms (Livingstone). The problem is that the accounting firms are also public companies that also have to look after their bottom line while still remaining objective with the corporations they audit. When an accounting firm is hired the company that hired them has the power in the relationship. When the company has the power they can bully the firm into doing what they tell them to do. The accounting firm then loses its objectivity and independence making their job ineffective and not accomplishing their goal of honest accounting (Gerard). Their have been 379 convictions of fraud to date, and 3 to 6 new cases opening per month. The problem has clearly not been solved (Ulinski).
Rob Hall’s Adventure Consultants and Scott Fischer’s Mountain Madness consisted of four guides, sixteen clients, and a number of Sherpas who together formed the groups with the goal of climbing to the Summit of Mount Everest. Every group member had an individual personal motivator for climbing Mount Everest. Some were wealthy individuals and paid thousands to check the climb off their bucket list, others joined the groups to record the experience in their respective travel magazines, while the leaders Hall and Fischer previously reached the Summit and wanted to increase the number of clients they led to the top. The members were not interdependent of one another in completing the task. Each member could have climbed the mountain individually, but decided to join the groups with one common goal to reach the Summit. Their task force groups were temporary as they would only last until the members returned from climbing the mountain. The Adventure Consultants and Mountain Madness witnessed positive and negative effects of their groups’ formation throughout their time on the mountain.
Jordan Belfort is the notorious 1990’s stockbroker who saw himself earning fifty million dollars a year operating a penny stock boiler room from his Stratton Oakmont, Inc. brokerage firm. Corrupted by drugs, money, and sex he went from being an innocent twenty – two year old on the fringe of a new life to manipulating the system in his infamous “pump and dump” scheme. As a stock swindler, he would motivate his young brokers through insane presentations to rile them up as they defrauded investors with duplicitous stock sales. Toward the end of this debauchery tale he was convicted for securities fraud and money laundering for which he was sentenced to twenty – two months in prison as well as recompensing two – hundred million in restitution to any swindled stock buyers of his brokerage firm (A&E Networks Television). Though his lavish spending and berserk party lifestyle was consumed by excessive greed, he displayed both positive and negative aspects of business communications.
Kaplan, R. S., & Kiron, D. (2007). Accounting Fraud at WorldCom. Boston: Harvard Business School Publishing.
"This is why the market keeps going down every day - investors don't know who to trust," said Brett Trueman, an accounting professor from the University of California-Berkeley's Haas School of Business. As these things come out, it just continues to build up"(CBS MarketWatch, Hancock). The memories of the Frauds at Enron and WorldCom still haunt many investors. There have been many accounting scandals in the United States history. The Enron and the WorldCom accounting fraud affected thousands of people and it caused many changes in the rules and regulation of the corporate world. There are many similarities and differences between the two scandals and many rules and regulations have been created in order to prevent frauds like these. Enron Scandal occurred before WorldCom and despite the devastating affect of the Enron Scandal, new rules and regulations were not created in time to prevent the WorldCom Scandal. Accounting scandals like these has changed the corporate world in many ways and people are more cautious about investing because their faith had been shaken by the devastating effects of these scandals. People lost everything they had and all their life-savings. When looking at the accounting scandals in depth, it is unbelievable how much to the extent the accounting standards were broken.
There are many highly publicized scandals about corporations getting caught using unethical and illegal accounting practices. Whether a whistle blower who is an insider with knowledge of illegal goings on at their company, a news reporter covering a story about a company ?? or an audit that might uncover financial irregularities noticing a company that is not using the generally accepted accounting practices (GAAP), a company not using the accounting standards set forth by governing oversight committees is bound to unravel.
The Adelphia Communications Scandal in 2002 dominated the corporate mainstream when the company’s management prepared financial statements that failed to represent the economic reality of the company by excluding billions of dollars of debt. The Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) calls the case “one of the most extensive financial frauds ever to take place at a public company” (Markon & Frank, 2002). At the center of the case is John Rigas, the founder, former chairman, chief executive of the company and the patriarch of the Rigas family. Also arrested are his sons, Timothy and Michael, both former executive board members, James R. Brown, former Vice President of Finance, and Michael C. Mulcahey, former Director of Internal Reporting. The lawsuit filed by th...
Jordan Belfort is the notorious 1990’s stockbroker who saw himself earning fifty million dollars a year operating a penny stock boiler room from his Stratton Oakmont, Inc. brokerage firm. Corrupted by drugs, money, and sex, he went from being an innocent twenty – two year old on the fringe of a new life to manipulating the system in his infamous “pump and dump” scheme. As a stock swindler, he would motivate his young brokers through insane presentations to rile them up as they defrauded investors with duplicitous stock sales. Toward the end of this debauchery tale he was convicted for securities fraud and money laundering for which he was sentenced to twenty – two months in prison as well as recompensing two – hundred million in restitution to any swindled stock buyers of his brokerage firm. Though his lavish spending and berserk party lifestyle was consumed by excessive greed, he displayed both positive and negative aspects of business communications.
Steady increase of earnings attracted many investors and entrepreneurs. However, everything has changed. Eventually the growth rate started decreasing gradually. Many company in the industry had to report losses like the closest competitor of WorldCom Inc., AT&T Corp. Despite of such situation, WorldCom continued to surprise the market reporting profit in 2001. Taking in consideration of nature of this industry, it is logical to assume, this market bears a great risk. The market was crowded and highly competitive. In addition, technologies are developed very rapid, new innovations are replacing old ones. The development of internet pushes huge corporations out t heir niches of the market. For external auditor is crucial to look at overall picture. In case with WorldCom, auditors should raise awareness and investigate the reason of such remarkable performance, when everyone goes down. They should take a closer look what is going on. Is it successful launch of new service or product, outstanding business strategy or earning management? Unfortunately, in WorldCom’s case external auditors failed to exercise their professional
“When a company called Enron… ascends to the number seven spot on the Fortune 500 and then collapses in weeks into a smoking ruin, its stock worth pennies, its CEO, a confidante of presidents, more or less evaporated, there must be lessons in there somewhere.” - Daniel Henninger.
Within Adelphia, there were assessments in regards to the company being over-leveraged. While knowing this, the Rigas family continued to work together and cover their tracks “to conceal the borrowings and inflate earnings” (Markon and Frank); rather than combating such issue of leveraging resulting in the fall of stock prices from the recession- in the late 1990s and early 2000s. Additionally, it seemed that employees and management of the company were ignorant to the fact of Adelphia being susceptible to such fraud. While many employees continued to add on to the fraud that the Rigas were committing, management did nothing to be able to stop such activity. They did not consider such activity or have controls set in place to detect such
Auditing has been the backbone of the complicated business world and has always changed with the times. As the business world grew strong, auditors’ roles grew more important. The auditors’ job became more difficult as the accounting principles changed. It also became easier with the use of internal controls, which introduced the need for testing, not a complete audit. Scandals and stock market crashes made auditors aware of deficiencies in auditing, and the auditing community was always quick to fix those deficiencies. Computers played an important role of changing the way audits were performed and also brought along some difficulties.