Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Detail of the history of auditing
Detail of the history of auditing
The Statements on Auditing Standards issued by the Auditing Standards Board
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Detail of the history of auditing
Auditing standards are currently seen as incredibly important to the Auditing profession and the Financial Industry as a whole. However, these standards were not always in place. Auditing was previously self-regulated and lacked guidance. Due to the many accounting scandals, stock crash, and securities market reforms that occurred, auditing was reformed, providing stronger requirements and placing more responsibility on those in charge. The McKesson & Robbins scandal of 1938 was the first catalyst for auditing reform. It was found that McKesson & Robbins had “’fraudulently represented its assets’ and that its affairs were being ‘carelessly conducted and mismanaged’” (Baxter,1999, p.165). The SEC investigated the audit firm used by McKesson & Robbins, PW. During this investigation, SEC found PW had “failed to employ that degree of vigilance, inquisitiveness, and analysis of the evidence available that is necessary” (Baxter, 1999, p. 172). The PW retorted that they had conformed to standards then applicable. As a result, the American Institute of Certified Public Accountants (AICPA) issued a new set of standards. The first set issued by the Auditing Standards Board (ASB) were the Statements of Auditing Procedures, which lasted from 1939 until 1972. In addition …show more content…
65). Classification provides assurance that information is recorded and properly presented in the correct accounts (AU Section 326, p.1863). Auditors often gather evidence by evaluating which items should have been expensed and which should have been capitalized. Understandability procedures ensure that disclosures are stated in a way that can be understood by financial statement users. This includes using simple language, such as shorter words and unambiguous sentences, and transparent ideas back by sufficient context (Smith & Taffler, 1992, p.
SEC has a significant influence on the audit of Smackey Dog Food, Inc because it sets certain auditing standards that need to be adhered to while conducting and audit of any organization. One of the standards is ensuring a professional independence of auditors as they carry out their audit. Keller CPA would be more objective in their opinion by maintaining independence in all maters and be free from conflict of interest in performing their professional engagement. Thus, although SEC does not possess direct control over privately held companies like Smackey, it, however, sets up generally accounting principles and disclosure requirements for all auditors to follow in order to prevent fraud and misstatement and to ensure fairness to users of audited financial statements for investment purposes or decision making. Therefore, Keller CPA would be required to follow the six generally accepted auditing standards established by ASB of the AICPA with regards to field work and reporting which were established through the influence of SEC.
Consistent accounting and financial frauds in the U.S. alerted the SEC to the imperative need for policy and corporate governance changes. The Sarbanes-Oxley Act in 2002 was enacted to encourage financial disclosures, enhance corporate responsibility, and combat fraudulent behaviour. This Act also helped create the PCAOB, which oversees the auditing practice (Stanwick & Stanwick 2009).
This organization has been setting ethical standards and publishing the Code of Professional Conduct for the profession since the early 1900s. A Code of Professional Conduct is necessary for any profession to help maintain strict ethical standards. This organization is the basis of ethical reasoning in the accounting profession because of what the Code of Professional Conduct covers. The code is comprised of a preamble and six articles. The preamble and the six articles serve as a foundation to provide guidance and guidelines for accountants to overcome any emerging ethical issues with ease on a daily basis. The six articles’ purpose is to protect the public, investors, and creditors. The AICPA Code of Professional Conduct consists of: Responsibility, Public Interest, Integrity, Objectivity and Independence, Due Care, and Scope and Nature of
The profession is slowly becoming as important as a doctor’s or a lawyer’s. Like so, where doctors and lawyers have certain standards they need to follow, accountants do as well. In the United States, the standards board is known as FASB, but around the rest of the world, the standards originate from IFRS. Globally there is a shift towards IFRS standards evident by the SEC permitting foreign businesses to use IFRS accounting principles when listing themselves on stock exchanges. This is putting pressure on FASB to converge with IFRS. Steven Mintz says this about IFRS
Throughout the past several years major corporate scandals have rocked the economy and hurt investor confidence. The largest bankruptcies in history have resulted from greedy executives that “cook the books” to gain the numbers they want. These scandals typically involve complex methods for misusing or misdirecting funds, overstating revenues, understating expenses, overstating the value of assets or underreporting of liabilities, sometimes with the cooperation of officials in other corporations (Medura 1-3). In response to the increasing number of scandals the US government amended the Sarbanes Oxley act of 2002 to mitigate these problems. Sarbanes Oxley has extensive regulations that hold the CEO and top executives responsible for the numbers they report but problems still occur. To ensure proper accounting standards have been used Sarbanes Oxley also requires that public companies be audited by accounting firms (Livingstone). The problem is that the accounting firms are also public companies that also have to look after their bottom line while still remaining objective with the corporations they audit. When an accounting firm is hired the company that hired them has the power in the relationship. When the company has the power they can bully the firm into doing what they tell them to do. The accounting firm then loses its objectivity and independence making their job ineffective and not accomplishing their goal of honest accounting (Gerard). Their have been 379 convictions of fraud to date, and 3 to 6 new cases opening per month. The problem has clearly not been solved (Ulinski).
With every business activity come opportunities for fraudulent behavior which leads to a greater demand for auditors with unscathed ethics. Nowadays, auditors are faced with a multitude of ethical issues, and it is even more problematic when the auditors fail to adhere to the standards of professional conducts as prescribed by the American Institute of Certified Public Accountants (AICPA). The objective of this paper is to analyze the auditors’ compliance with the code of professional conduct in the way it relates to the effectiveness of their audits.
One of the most debatable topics in the accounting industry today is the extent in which we should make the financial statements understandable to the general population. The FASB currently gears its reporting standards toward...
As accountants, we have an ethical obligation under the AICPA Code that requires us to place the public's interest ahead of all other interest, including our own self-interest and that of our employer or client. We must be independent, make decisions objectively, exercise due care, and must act with integrity. The standards of the Institute of Management Accountants (IMA) are similar to the Professional Conduct in the AICPA Code. Moreover, the principles of the AICPA Code include responsibilities, the public interest, integrity, objectivity and independence, due care, and scope and nature of services. The IMA provides guidance on issues relating to competence, confidentiality, integrity, and credibility. The Resolution of Ethical Conflict section
This shows how a lack of transparency in reporting of financial statements leads to the destruction of a company. This all happened under the watchful eye of an auditor, Arthur Andersen. After this scandal, the Sarbanes-Oxley Act was changed to keep into account the role of the auditors and how they can help in preventing such
The ‘deficient standards gap’ refers to situations when the auditors are not required by the standards to report certain issues, whilst its counterpart refers to situations when auditors have not complied with the existing standards. This dissection is particularly important when I look at each of the problems separately later on and look for the respective solutions. The beginning Since the early 1970s, the auditing profession has been under increased pressure and scrutiny by government and users of audit reports. The phrase, ‘Audit Expectations Gap’ was first coined when the AICPA put the Cohen Commission together in 1974 to investigate whether the ‘expectations gap’ existed. However, the history of the expectation gap goes right back to the start of company auditing in the nineteenth century (Humphrey and Turley 1992).
The scandals have made some big implications on the profession as a whole. One being the decision from the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (PCAOB), created by the Sarbanes-Oxley Act (SOA) of 2002, in April 2003 they voted to assume the responsibility for establishing auditing standards. The Auditing Standards Board of the American Institute of Certified Public Accountants (AICPA) previously played this role.
Corporate governance changed drastically after the case of Andersen Auditors, Enron’s auditing service showed that they contributed to the scandal. Andersen was originally founded in 1913, and by taking tough stands against clients, quickly gained a national reputation as a reliable keeper of the people’s trust (Beasley, 2003). Andersen provided auditing statements with a ‘clean’ approval stamp from 1997 to 2001, but was found guilty of obstructing justice by shredding evidence relating to the Enron scandal on the 15th June 2002. It agrees to cease auditing public companies by 31 August (BBC News, 2002).
The International Accounting Standards Board, (IASB), began life as the International Accounting Standards Committee (IASC) in the 1973. The IASC was created in June 1973 as a result of an agreement by the accountancy bodies of Australia, Canada, France, Germany, Japan, Mexico, the Netherlands, the United Kingdom and Ireland and the United States. These countries constituted the Board of IASC at that time.
According to business, or any organization, Accounting plays a major role in developing and growth of the business. Financial standards of the organization expected as the complexities of business growth and expansion. Hence determining the implementation of the standards can vary according to the type of industry, business or organization.
The evolution of auditing is a complicated history that has always been changing through historical events. Auditing always changed to meet the needs of the business environment of that day. Auditing has been around since the beginning of human civilization, focusing mainly, at first, on finding efraud. As the United States grew, the business world grew, and auditing began to play more important roles. In the late 1800’s and early 1900’s, people began to invest money into large corporations. The Stock Market crash of 1929 and various scandals made auditors realize that their roles in society were very important. Scandals and stock market crashes made auditors aware of deficiencies in auditing, and the auditing community was always quick to fix those deficiencies. The auditors’ job became more difficult as the accounting principles changed, and became easier with the use of internal controls. These controls introduced the need for testing; not an in-depth detailed audit. Auditing jobs would have to change to meet the changing business world. The invention of computers impacted the auditors’ world by making their job at times easier and at times making their job more difficult. Finally, the auditors’ job of certifying and testing companies’ financial statements is the backbone of the business world.