Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Concise history of auditing
Concise history of auditing
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Auditing is in the challenging position with the emerging technologies and real-time approach in doing business. The audit is a complex activity; this profession has been through many significant changes over the time. The changes that were important for auditing to be updated with the changing business environment. All the changes were done as per the requirements of the legislation that shaped the auditing profession. The main purpose of this paper is to examine what different legislations and how the legislation shaped the audit profession over the past century. History of auditing profession People have relied upon the auditing procedures for many years, but the formal practice of auditing has a short period of being into existence. The …show more content…
It is shifting from a profession which has been relatively free of Federal control to one which is both strongly influenced, and indeed regulated, by the Federal government. For the past 75 years, the auditing profession in the United States has promoted "self-regulation." Although it has never been officially defined, "self-regulation" has generally been used to signify the right to establish and enforce auditing standards with only minimal Federal supervision. Yet, ironically, the changes that are taking place may result in broader and more substantive Federal supervision of the profession than any of the proposed Federal regulatory measures that the profession has explicitly challenged. (Granof, M. H. (1992, December). Privatization: The Road to Federal Regulation of Auditing. Accounting Horizons. pp. …show more content…
The most dramatic change was the establishment of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (PCAOB) as an external regulator over audit practice, with the authority to conduct annual inspections of the auditors of ‘‘large-filer’’ regulated companies. The increased regulatory environment in conjunction with the audit fee and audit market changes discussed above likely enhanced Big 4 auditors’ negotiation power, potentially making them more conservative and less likely to waive proposed adjustments. (Joe, J., Wright, A., & Wright, S. (2011). The Impact of Client and Misstatement Characteristics on the Disposition of Proposed Audit Adjustments. Auditing: A Journal Of Practice & Theory, 30(2), 103-124.
The SEC and the former Chairman Arthur Levitt Jr. were extremely concerned that the public accounting firms were violating the auditors independence rules addressed through the Securities Exchange Acts. Auditing firms now had dual citizenship in public companies: (1) they issued opinions on audited financial statements and (2) they participated in various consulting engagements for those same companies. Levitt's solution was to split auditing and consulting. The former Chairman was concerned that the public would lose confidence in the financial markets …… and the whole system would be jeopardized.
Throughout the past several years major corporate scandals have rocked the economy and hurt investor confidence. The largest bankruptcies in history have resulted from greedy executives that “cook the books” to gain the numbers they want. These scandals typically involve complex methods for misusing or misdirecting funds, overstating revenues, understating expenses, overstating the value of assets or underreporting of liabilities, sometimes with the cooperation of officials in other corporations (Medura 1-3). In response to the increasing number of scandals the US government amended the Sarbanes Oxley act of 2002 to mitigate these problems. Sarbanes Oxley has extensive regulations that hold the CEO and top executives responsible for the numbers they report but problems still occur. To ensure proper accounting standards have been used Sarbanes Oxley also requires that public companies be audited by accounting firms (Livingstone). The problem is that the accounting firms are also public companies that also have to look after their bottom line while still remaining objective with the corporations they audit. When an accounting firm is hired the company that hired them has the power in the relationship. When the company has the power they can bully the firm into doing what they tell them to do. The accounting firm then loses its objectivity and independence making their job ineffective and not accomplishing their goal of honest accounting (Gerard). Their have been 379 convictions of fraud to date, and 3 to 6 new cases opening per month. The problem has clearly not been solved (Ulinski).
With every business activity come opportunities for fraudulent behavior which leads to a greater demand for auditors with unscathed ethics. Nowadays, auditors are faced with a multitude of ethical issues, and it is even more problematic when the auditors fail to adhere to the standards of professional conducts as prescribed by the American Institute of Certified Public Accountants (AICPA). The objective of this paper is to analyze the auditors’ compliance with the code of professional conduct in the way it relates to the effectiveness of their audits.
An auditor needs to follow, abide and comply with the standards, rules and regulations of their profession, as these will help the auditor to recognize when independence and objectivity are compromised. Works Cited Gray, Iain and Stuart Manson. The Audit Process: Principles, Practice and Cases. London: Thomson Learning, 2008. Print.
The Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (PCAOB) employees are required not to have any direct relationships with the public companies and/or employees of the companies in order to keep all terms of accountability fair. Title I of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act describes the ro...
It has been said that after deregulation in the early 1990’s, corporate conduct was running fast and loose. This deregulation allowed corporations and the accounting industry to self-regulate itself and it was expected that corporations and their boards would do the right thing, thus softening up the business climate and promoting commerce. Unfortunately, when it comes to self-regulations, greed and self-advancement often come to light.
Audit quality is one of the most prominent factors on determining the effectiveness of tax auditing. Audit quality is proven by the capacity of office in order to provide useful tax auditing findings and recommendations. The auditor is required to meet the performance standards which able to perform well in work by providing useful audit findings and recommendations for improvement. The office’s capability to correctly plan and perform the audit findings is considered as a proxy of audit quality. Therefore, the high audit quality could lead to an effective tax
Since the early 1970s, the auditing profession has been under increased pressure and scrutiny by government and users of audit reports. The phrase ‘ Audit Expectations Gap’ was first coined when the AICPA put the Cohen Commission together in 1974 to investigate whether the ‘expectations gap’ existed. However, the history of the expectation gap goes right back to the start of company auditing in the nineteenth century (Humphrey and Turley 1992). Since then, events ranging from the collapse of Arthur Anderson to the ongoing savings and loan problems seemed to have made the gap become more and more apparent.
The scandals have made some big implications on the profession as a whole. One being the decision from the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (PCAOB), created by the Sarbanes-Oxley Act (SOA) of 2002, in April 2003 they voted to assume the responsibility for establishing auditing standards. The Auditing Standards Board of the American Institute of Certified Public Accountants (AICPA) previously played this role.
Corporate governance changed drastically after the case of Andersen Auditors, Enron’s auditing service showed that they contributed to the scandal. Andersen was originally founded in 1913, and by taking tough stands against clients, quickly gained a national reputation as a reliable keeper of the people’s trust (Beasley, 2003). Andersen provided auditing statements with a ‘clean’ approval stamp from 1997 to 2001, but was found guilty of obstructing justice by shredding evidence relating to the Enron scandal on the 15th June 2002. It agrees to cease auditing public companies by 31 August (BBC News, 2002).
The major characters of the tradition audit are all information what is needed by auditors are on the paper and the manual calculators and without high communication technology. Auditors usually were limited by the place in the paper time. When a several people are working on the same auditing project for a client with offices in cities across the country, even worldwide, it takes a lots all time those auditors get the information which they need from the client, even there is risk paper information disappear for many reasons. on the another hand, mail paper information increase the auditing cost. The mistake caused by the manual calculators inevitably, no matter how fixed auditors concentrate on recalculate is, after all auditors are human. The global business become major in the modern business world, some example, several auditors who are in different locations are working a same auditing project, or auditors are in different city even country with the client, when there is issue among these auditors or between auditors and client, they only can communicate with each other by phone or be together and have meeting. Phone call can not make sure information been watched in the same time when the voice is talking about the issue, but having a meeting takes time and money make all people together, it increases auditing cost.
The history of accounting I feel is important in the learning, understanding, and developing of my foundation for my accounting career. In this report you will learn about the development of accounting. You will learn about the people who influenced accounting the most throughout the years. You will learn how accounting came about and how it was used in the ancient times. You will learn about the invention of the double-entry bookkeeping processes. You will learn how things were done before the birth of the double-entry bookkeeping process. You will learn about Luca Pacioli and the Summa. You will also learn about modern accounting and ACAUS.
4) . One of the largest bankruptcies in history was enabled by accountants hiding debt and destroying the evidence to avoid implication (Buckstein, part 2 pgs. 1, 2, and 3). These unfortunate events led to the need for increased scrutiny and regulations, including the Sarbanes-Oxley Act (Buckstein, part 3 pg 1). This legislation inspired the creation of the Canadian Public Accountability Board (CPAB) (Buckstein, part 3 pg 1). These changes have led to an increased awareness of the need for auditor independence as well as higher standards for accounting and business in general (Buckstein, part 3 pg 1). While these measures have helped to reassure the public, there is still the question of why Accountancy is not a protected
The evolution of auditing is a complicated history that has always been changing through historical events. Auditing always changed to meet the needs of the business environment of that day. Auditing has been around since the beginning of human civilization, focusing mainly, at first, on finding efraud. As the United States grew, the business world grew, and auditing began to play more important roles. In the late 1800’s and early 1900’s, people began to invest money into large corporations. The Stock Market crash of 1929 and various scandals made auditors realize that their roles in society were very important. Scandals and stock market crashes made auditors aware of deficiencies in auditing, and the auditing community was always quick to fix those deficiencies. The auditors’ job became more difficult as the accounting principles changed, and became easier with the use of internal controls. These controls introduced the need for testing; not an in-depth detailed audit. Auditing jobs would have to change to meet the changing business world. The invention of computers impacted the auditors’ world by making their job at times easier and at times making their job more difficult. Finally, the auditors’ job of certifying and testing companies’ financial statements is the backbone of the business world.
The study of history is defined as the narration, documentation and analysis of events that occur in the past, and for many years history has influenced several structural models and customs within the present-day society. Accounting history is, the narration and interpretation of historical events that have impacted the accounting profession. This essay seeks to investigate the impact of history on accounting and the relevance of accounting history, to addresses and answer the question of the importance of history in the accounting profession.