Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
How the rise of Christianity impacted art during that time
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Iconoclastic controversy was a dispute over the use of religious images in the Byzantine Empire during the 8th and 9th centuries. The people who believed the icons were wrong were called iconoclasts. Iconoclasts disagreed against the worship of religious images because of the scripture in the Old Testament. This scripture is one of the Ten Commandments and says, “'You shall not make yourself a carved image or any likeness of anything in heaven above or on earth beneath or in the waters under the earth.” (http://www.catholic.org/bible/book.php?bible_chapter=20&id=2) Another reason that Iconoclasts are against religious images is because there is the possibility of idolatry. The people who defended worshipping icons said that the icons have symbolic …show more content…
nature. The use of icons gained a lot of popularity in the eastern provinces of the Roman Empire. There had been a submarine volcanic eruption in the Aegean Sea, causing tsunamis and a lot of lives lost. Leo III interpreted it as God’s judgment. In 726, Leo III announced that he did not agree with the worship of icons and the tsunamis were a sign that the icons were the reason the destruction had happened.
Leo III removed an image of Christ over the Chalke Gate in Constantinople and changed it to a cross. He said that the image was idolatry. Pope Gregory II was the pope at this time. He received a letter from an emperor telling him to destroy all the images in Rome and to create a council to stop their use. Pope Gregory II answered in defense of the pictures. In the letter, Gregory explains the difference between the images and the idols. Leo replies by threatening him and saying that he will destroy the statue of St. Peter. The pope answers by saying he would be able to easily escape and the West will not like that Leo wants them to destroy their images at his command. Pope Gregory says he would stay determined to prove the emperor’s threats. The West did not agree with the East. In Rome, Ravenna, and Naples, the people rose up against the emperor’s law about icons. Pope Gregory II refused to send taxes to Constantinople. In 730 the use of icons was officially prohibited. Those who worshipped icons were now subject to persecution. The Western church remained firm in belief of …show more content…
worshipping icons. There they condemned Leo’s actions. Leo responded by taking the papal estates in Calabria and Sicily, and placed them under the Patriarch of Constantinople. After Leo’s death, his son, Constantine V, called forth the Council of Hieria. At the council, around 330 to 340 bishops showed up. This was the first official church council that dealt with primarily religious icons. John of Damascus was a Syrian Monk who lived outside of the Byzantine Empire. He became a major part of iconoclasm through his theological writings. There had been talk of secret monasteries where the worshipping of icons took place, but there is not sufficient evidence that that happened. Some monks continued to support the use of icons, but most followed the church’s policy. Pope Gregory died in 731.
Gregory III succeeded him. He sent a priest named George with letters that were against Iconoclasm to Constantinople. He was too afraid to present them, and did not fulfill the job. George was then sent out again and was arrested and imprisoned in Italy by a governor. In 731, Gregory III held a synod of 93 bishops who broke and destroyed images of
Christ. Twenty seven years after the synod with Gregory III, Iconoclasm occurred again. The holy pictures were destroyed and people who defended them would be persecuted. Pope Paschal acts how Pope Gregory II acted. Just like before, a woman held a council and restored the rule of worshipping icons. In 787, the empress Irene, who was married to Leo IV, wanted to restore the use of icons. She had Tarasuis, one of her followers, elected patriarch of Constantinople. She then constructed a church council about the worship of icons. The next meeting was held in Constantinople in 786. The meeting, however, was broken up by a group of Iconoclast soldiers who were stationed in Constantinople at that time. Then, in 787, the Seventh Ecumenical Council met in Nicaea. At the council, both the Roman Catholic and the Eastern Orthodox churches were present. Unlike the iconoclastic councils, there were papal representatives. They came to a decision to restore the use of iconic images. Icon veneration continued after Irene’s death with the successor Nikephoros 1 and some reigns after. After Leo V’s accession in 814, the Iconoclasts regained power and the use of icons was prohibited again at a council. In 815, the revival of iconoclasm was made official by a synod held in Hagia Sophia. Under the power of Theophilus, the use of icons was prohibited. Emperor John Philoponus had created a persecution against people who used icons in Orthodox liturgy to weaken the spread of Greek Orthodox monasticism. A lot of people were Iconoclasts, except the Greek Orthodox who defended their sacred art. After Theophilus’ death in 842, his widow restored the worship of icons. This event is called the Feast of Orthodoxy and is still celebrated in the Eastern Orthodox Church. The popes did not have much control. The popes that reined in the West thought that worshipping idols was not a bad thing and they had reasoning to back up what they were saying. The popes who reigned in the Eastern also had their own reasons why they did not agree with iconoclasm. The popes did do a good job controlling and standing up for their region and what they wanted the rule to be. Many councils and synods were held because of iconoclasm, but every time they just came out to the opposite agreement. This went on for hundreds of years. I think the popes did everything in their power to try to come to an agreement but it was mostly the disagreement between people. I do not think that this could have been solved. I do not think that there would have ever been a way to prevent the Great Schism. The West and the East were two very different areas. The East was rich and powerful and the West was not.
Did Justinian impact life as we know it because he is such a great ruler, or is he just a follower who keeps trying to hold on to the loose threads of a fallen empire? Some might say that without Justinian, humanity is a step further back. Others may argue evermore that Justinian is a two-faced liar who you cannot trust (Doc. 2). Contrary to many beliefs, Justinian creates a new Byzantine Empire after the fall of Rome that is influential to many different cultures, more advanced and educated than Rome, and more economically thriving than the Roman Empire.
The representation of divinity was clearly defined in Christ in Majesty with Symbols of the Four Evangelists through its subject matter, technique, and style. Christ acts as the focal point, but the artist also used different subjects from the Old and New Testament to decorate the apse. Unlike the mosaics in the apse of Byzantine churches, the artist employed the technique of classical fresco painting. The artist also applied decoration to the figures with the hierarchy of scale, and through the geometric style in the drapery instead of maintaining a sense of realism.
...rulers were unsuccessful and that iconophobic views would help strengthen the Byzantine Empire. (pg. 247) Under Leo’s command a council was assembled and met at Hagia Sophia three times to discuss the matter of icons. (pg. 249) Leo’s report was read and those who did not agree with it were spit on, beaten, or dismissed from the council. (pg. 247) On the third day a proposal was created and approved in favor of iconoclasm. (pg. 247) The previous teachings of Hieria were subjected as being right in which they stated that “images are essentially idols, icons of Christ either circumscribe his uncircumscribable divinity or split his divine and human natures, and images cannot convey the resurrected glory of saints”. (pg. 247) Although Leo had suggested that images be removed from reach in churches, the council had not done much to actually engage in iconoclasm. (pg. 250)
Flood explains the origin of Islamic iconoclasm through a quote by K.A.C. Creswell stating, "the inherent temperamental dislike of Semitic races for representational art" and believes iconoclasm is contested among Muslims as well. The Hadith, which is the narrative of the Prophet's life forbids "all representations that have shadows (whose defacement is obligatory), and some schools of thought go so far as to liken artists to polytheists." Although the impact of iconoclasm depends on the time and place in which it occurred, the Hadith definitely helped to promote "the eschewal of figural imagery" and "the destruction or mutilation of existing figural imagery." In 696-697 figural imagery was repla...
Justinian was one of the most influential rulers of Byzantium. When he came into power in 527 AD, he inherited a civilization in disarray. Justinian had a positive impact on the Byzantine Empire. Most notably, he introduced an improved set of laws and conquered many surrounding nations, nearly restoring the former glory of the Roman Empire. In addition to these contributions, Justinian also made advances with the Christian Church and Byzantine architecture.
The Byzantine mosaic was an early Christian predecessor whereby it clear cuts the religious tales drawn from the bible. There was a combination of forces between the political and religious authority which gave the emperor power over the architecture and art of Byzantine Empire. The Roman Empire was collapsing due to the interruption by German tribes hence they were not able to teach manners and morals according to the artistic and cultural ways of the mosaics hence they were unable to determine art of the early Christianity while the art of Byzantine
She illustrates the reasons behind iconoclasm, for example, the Roman army used to stole the statue of the captured city to Rome. They usually did not destroy the statue, but displacing these and bringing these art objects to Rome is also a different form of iconoclasm. Another important reason of destroying image or statue is to show disrespect to the specific person or society. Brubaker also claims that " A broader conception of image destruction - perhaps closer to our modern understanding of the term iconoclasm - is attributed to the Byzantines" (Brubaker 2013, 15), however Byzantines iconoclasm was under Christian context, but here the context is Islamic iconoclasm. Idolatry and image worship is forbidden in Islam, moreover, Islam is
The Ottoman Empire were Muslims and included Hungary, Syria, Egypt, Bulgaria, and Albania, and they marched on land. The Ottoman Empire is said to have first appeared somewhere around the 1300’s, and can be related to the decline of the Byzantine Empire. They began conquering Christian lands and by the late 1600’s all Christians were afraid of the “terrible Turk”. It is no wonder that many other people were afraid of the Ottoman Empire since they seem to be really rather powerful and they conquered a lot of land. It was in the 1330’s when the Morroccan Abu Abdallah Ibn Battuta passed through Constantinople and became impressed with the Ottomans who seemed to be gaining power rather quickly, he noticed that they had close to 100 forts and
The use of art forms and sculpture as a means of conveying a message to its viewers has been rooted deep into culture throughout human history. Imagery has carved political views and depictions of society’s circumstances into permanent marks of antiquity. From the Ancient Roman architecture and sculpture to the 1900’s emergence of media in politics, we have continued to express our views, hardships, and culture in permanent ways, and use art as an intricate form of manipulation and persuasion. In the ancient times, the Romans used sculpture to portray individuals of power, such as Augustus, to mark a political ideology by making powerful figures look more pristine and perfect on a godly level. They would portray the unattainable perfection
What do Plato, Aristotle, mosaics, and icons have in common? They are all important parts of Byzantine culture, which spans the course of over 1,000 years, from the fall of Rome to the decline of the Byzantine Empire. The Byzantines were important facilitators of the Renaissance. The Byzantines preserved Greek and Roman traditions and created many of their own, which would have a great impact during the Renaissance.
hammed. Byzantine and the Muslims worlds were the very first in the western world to base their governing off of their monotheistic beliefs. The religion of Islam began in Mecca, however the beginning of the Muslim period started with Mohammed’s voyage from Mecca to Medina. The religion quickly spread from India to Spain.
Constantine the Great, first Christian Emperor, originator of Constantinople, creator of the Byzantine Empire, military conqueror, and honored saint, has been labeled by many the most instrumental emperor of the Roman Empire. Constantine played a crucial role in the development of Europe during the Middle Ages, and founded Christianity as the formal religion of the Roman Empire. His dynamic yet effective predominance laid the infrastructure of European development. From his humble beginnings, to his command of the Roman Empire, to his final days, Constantine’s impact on world history and Christianity has left behind an unforgettable legacy. He was described by Eusebius as “such an emperor as all history records not.” Ware compared him to, “a watershed in the history of the Church.” Additionally, Meyendorff states, “No single human being in history has contributed to the conversion of so many to the Christian faith.” Norwich declared that “No ruler in all of history has ever more fully merited his title of ‘the Great’…Constantine has serious claim to be considered the most influential man in all of history.” Some of Constantine’s notable acts in the history of Christianity was his calling of the first Ecumenical Council at Nicaea, his institution of freedom for Christianity with the Edict of Milan, and the relocation of the capital of empire from Rome to Constantinople.
Throughout human history power imbalances have been prevalent in almost every civilization. One method of controlling people, in addition to power power, is to control how much knowledge gets out to the masses. This paper examines how iconoclasm is used in the Middle East as a method of controlling popular opinions and thoughts on race,sex and many other important details of everyday life. Iconoclasm is the systemic destruction of religious or cultural pieces of artwork for political or religious reasons. The destruction of artifacts can rewrite cultural history and change opinions on how the history of a nation is perceived. This also results in extensive loss of cultural history which can never be recovered. The Middle East is of particular interest in this research paper as it has been in the news recently for such acts. Most Middle Eastern countries have Islam listed as their official religion. In Islam it is forbidden to show the face of Allah, the God of Islam, in any form of artwork. It is also seen as taboo to have any living creatures such as humans or animals depicted in a mosque, the Islamic place of worship. As such, many buildings which have been converted into mosques have been defaced to suit the proper Islamic code. One such incident of this happening is the Hagia Sophia in Istanbul. Once a Roman Catholic church, it was converted into a mosque after the conquer of the Byzantine Empire by the Ottoman Turks and all mosaics depicting Jesus, His mother and saints were removed. Another popular incident attributed to iconoclasm within Middle Eastern countries include the missing nose of the Sphinx in Egypt(World Heritage Site). One confirmed incident of iconoclasm in within the past few decades is of the defacing and d...
Constantine claimed to see a vision before a battle, telling him that using a Christian symbol would guarantee him a victory. From then on, Constantine was a Christian. Although there is some question still as to whether or not he actually believed, there’s no denying that he tried to accomplish what he could for the good of the church. While he was emperor, he worked to unite the Christian church. At the time, there were many conflicts between the Arians and the Trinitarians. He called together meetings to work out the issues, make the final decisions on what would be considered right, and then use his position as emperor to enforce what he decreed. Eventually, he began letting the letting the Church take care of some parts of the government, which made it a political power, and allowed him even more control of the Christians. They would support the emperor since he gave them power. The Roman emperor,
Early Christian and Byzantine art started after Jesusí death in the first century ranging and ending to the fourth century AD. The art produced during this period was secretive because Christianity was not a formal religion but as a cult; the Romans and rest of Europe persecuted Christians so the artist disguised their work with symbols and hints of Christian aspects. Christianity was the first cult to not involve rituals of sacrifice of animals and refused to worship an Emperor causing the Roman Empire to make Christianity illegal. Byzantine art excelled in the Justinian period in the east during 520-540 AD. The art was produced in Ravenna, Byzantine, Venice, Sicily, Greece, and Russia. The difference between Christian and Byzantine is that Christian was earth beyond realism and Byzantine was more spiritual than worldly style. This art period was sectioned off into three different periods. The first was persecution from the first to the third century. The second was due to Constantine making Christianity legal in the fourth century. The last period is known as New Christian style starting in the fifth century. Most of the art from this period was frescoes, mosaics, and architecture.