Iconoclasm Essay

1163 Words3 Pages

Iconoclasm in the Early Middle Ages and the Present

Iconoclasm refers to the opposition and destruction of religious images by religious and imperial authorities. It is believed that Byzantine iconoclasm occurred in two waves, the first being during the 8th century and the second during the 9th century. There are many theories as to how and why iconoclasm started during the Byzantine Era and these will be debated. The methods and reasons of Byzantine iconoclasm will also be compared to modern day iconoclasm.
Although the actual year is disputed, the first Byzantine iconoclasm is believed to have started with Emperor Leo III around 723-725. (pg. 53) There are many different written sources that discuss what actually happened during this time, however not all coincide with each other completely. Nicephorous of Constantinople recalls the events in his “Short History” during the late 780’s making it one of the closest sources to the actual events. (pg. 53) He states that Leo heard volcanic eruptions on the islands of Thera and Therasia and he took these eruptions as a merciless sign from God and ultimately began planning the removal of icons. (pg. 53) In another source, “The Chronicle”, Theophane also mentions that Emperor Leo hears the volcanic eruptions on the islands, and states that he understood the Godly symbol as reassuring that what he was already doing was the right thing. Theophane states that before this eruption, Leo had met with a Jewish wizard who had promised him a reign of forty years if he removed the holy icons from churches. (pg. 53) This source however was written around 815, so it is uncertain how accurate Theophanes reports are. Theophane also stated that there was much opposition to Leo’s views from people...

... middle of paper ...

...rulers were unsuccessful and that iconophobic views would help strengthen the Byzantine Empire. (pg. 247) Under Leo’s command a council was assembled and met at Hagia Sophia three times to discuss the matter of icons. (pg. 249) Leo’s report was read and those who did not agree with it were spit on, beaten, or dismissed from the council. (pg. 247) On the third day a proposal was created and approved in favor of iconoclasm. (pg. 247) The previous teachings of Hieria were subjected as being right in which they stated that “images are essentially idols, icons of Christ either circumscribe his uncircumscribable divinity or split his divine and human natures, and images cannot convey the resurrected glory of saints”. (pg. 247) Although Leo had suggested that images be removed from reach in churches, the council had not done much to actually engage in iconoclasm. (pg. 250)

More about Iconoclasm Essay

Open Document