Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
The use of art forms and sculpture as a means of conveying a message to its viewers has been rooted deep into culture throughout human history. Imagery has carved political views and depictions of society’s circumstances into permanent marks of antiquity. From the Ancient Roman architecture and sculpture to the 1900’s emergence of media in politics, we have continued to express our views, hardships, and culture in permanent ways, and use art as an intricate form of manipulation and persuasion. In the ancient times, the Romans used sculpture to portray individuals of power, such as Augustus, to mark a political ideology by making powerful figures look more pristine and perfect on a godly level. They would portray the unattainable perfection …show more content…
The primary function of monumental portraits in Ancient Rome was to honor political figures of power through repeating social and political themes. The Romans expressed these themes through a form of “realism”. Relics of this era were found depicting the elderly conservative nobility that lived through civil disruptions and war, elaborately individualized through detail of the face expression. Through the features of grimacing heaviness, wrinkles, and effects of old age, the Romans were able to express the reality of their political situation felt by the people whose faces were sculptured into stone. Furthermore, Nodelman discusses the use of sculpture portraits to depict the ideology behind Roman conservative aristocracy. Artists would portray the virtues of gravitas, dignities, and fides, through the use to physical expression and symbolic meaning, rather than through words. A statue of Augustus, for instance, displays the militaristic, powerful, godly perception of the conservative ideology through the use of symbolic detail. The decorative, rich, military outfit on Augustus, represents the power of the military and Augustus’s role as imperator in it. The freely held masculine arm and pointing gesture towards the horizon are Rome’s expanding dreams, clashing with the overall powerful and sturdy stance of the body. The bare feet bring about the impression …show more content…
He discusses that Roman statues appear greatly similar to those of Ancient Greece, both in material and in style. The statues both from Greece and Roman Republic were made from slabs of marble and bronze. In both cultures, portraits were used as expressions of honor to both the living and the dead. They were often used in funerary spaces and sanctuaries. Stewart supports the same principle that the other critics have stated, that portraits and statues were used primarily by the wealthy and elite members of the republic. They decorated the public spaces of the people, as a reminder of leadership within the community and as a way to honor the authority’s power. Imperial portraits were used as a symbol of devotion and established the presence of a powerful empire, bringing the devotion towards the emperor
In this paper I am exploring “Portrait of Augustus as general” and “Khafre enthroned”. From exploring and getting to know the Statues in my Art History Book I have compared these statues (Kleiner, 2013). The first and most obvious similarity between the two is in the artists’ idealization and immortalization of their subjects. Both Khafre and Augustus are portrayed in an idealized manner, designed to give the impression of nobility, timelessness, and divinity. The two statues were the political advertisements of their times that showed the public images of reliable leaders who one
The human form transcends throughout time persistently present in art. Dating all the way back to Paleolithic human beings our renderings of idealized forms have served many purposes. Though the Neolithic and Paleolithic purpose of these renderings is widely speculative the range of reason for these depictions ranges from idolization and worship to assertion of aristocratic and economic status even to simply serving as statements of self-expression. Amongst ruins and artifacts, sculptures of ancient cultures demonstrate the ways in which humans perceptions of what is aesthetically desirable have progressed. Two idealized sculptures the Woman from Willendorf and the Khafre statue with approximately 21,500 years separating their individual gestations this demonstrate the stylistic progression of idealized imagery through time.
The Statue of a kouros and the Portrait statue of a boy both depict similar subjects, however are greatly different in how they accomplish this task. Through detail, or lack there of, the Greeks and Romans are able to display a certain value they have in its members. These two statues were made about 500 years apart and approach the sculpting process quit differently. The Greek statue seems to use geometric exaggerated lines to form the body while the Romans use a more realistic approach and sculpt the body with a more rounded finish. Statue of a kouros, from about 590 B.C and Portrait of a boy, from about the first century, do not share any great technical aspects and are basically nothing alike.
Zanker, Paul. The power of images in the Age of Augustus. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press, 1988. (P. 158 ~ 159)
The Romans have adopted many features from the Greek style of art and architecture during the third and second centuries B.C. During that time period the Romans discovered that they have taking a liking to Greek statues, which they placed in many different places. The Roman sculptors then decided to also start making statues alongside the Greeks. The statues that the Romans created were realistic looking with, sometime, unpleasant details of the body. The Greeks made statues with, what they thought of, ideal appearances in the statues figure. Sculpture was possibly considered the highest form of art by the Romans, but figure painting was very high considered as well. Very little of Roman painting has survived the tests of time.
The Flavian period created a climate of acceptance of one’s true self, hence the use of realism. The portrayal of realism in Roman portrait sculptures may have been developed from the tradition of keeping wax funeral masks of deceased family members in the ancestral home which were worn by mourners at family funerals (Cartwright).
The statue Augustus of Primaporta was not only used to convey the likeness of the Emperor Augustus to his people across the Roman Empire, it was also interspersed with symbols and messages about the ruler’s ideals and power. It was distributed throughout the empire as propaganda for Augustus and as a declaration of the new era he intended to bring about. This strategic imagery and its successfulness in conveying the greatness of its commissioner influenced many successive leaders around the world to command similarly symbolic likenesses to be made of themselves, such as Trajan in the second century CE.
Ancient Roman society was robust, fluid, and exciting. Personal freedoms were at an all-time high, just as they were and still mostly are in modern America. Art was a means of displaying the creativity and ingenuity of both the artist, and of the society in which the artist lived. Early American artists such as Norman Rockwell, Grandma Moses, and Mary Cassatt depicted various aspects of their societies. However...
The statue of Augustus Prima Porta clearly exemplifies with his appearance the idea of a Mediterranean hero. Regardless of the beauty of the sculpture, its main purpose was to portrait his personality and the way it wanted to be remembered as an immortal character which accomplishes one of the functions of art that is to commemorate. In brief, we look at a Roman Emperor, which points his right hand above into the distance in a savant commanding way. The detail that we can appreciate in his amour represents the grandeur of his victories and his supreme imperial power.
I hope through this article the reader has gained a better understanding how the human race has used sculpting and statues to share the values, experiences and emotions from our rich history. From the shores of liberty, to the museums of strength, to the cities of courage and the beach towns of peace the reader can find a rich history of human values. Everyone should be encouraged to conduct their own research into other statues created and review the values that they are built to reflect and share.
An important difference is that, “A key aspect of Roman public art was the commemoration of important individuals, and the later Republic is a period of striking portraits of leading Romans” (Hensig). On the other hand, the Realism movement idolized the importance of the people of the working class, according to “Realism Movement, Artists and Major Works.” This shows that artists in Rome made the life and accomplishments of rulers and heroes important, but Realism artists wanted to show the opposite of that. This is because of the urging for democratic government systems in Europe, whereas people in Rome cherished the Empire. Realism art was effective in approaching a want for equality, whereas the Romans’ approach effectively did the opposite, by bringing idols into the world. Roman art seemed to wish to teach people the accomplishments of their rulers. However, Realism art, as “Realism Movement, Artists and Major Works” states, cherished, and therefore taught people the importance of the life of the lower and middle class civilians. This effectiveness worked better in Rome, however, as most of the people only had that art to view, unlike the still popular Romantic and Neoclassical art in the 1800’s. Another major difference is the people’s support of the art. Whereas, according to Martin Henig, Roman art was a sign of wealth, and thus widely needed
They met the Egyptians, the most advanced civilization at the time. The Ancient Greeks were impressed with the Egyptians. It is conceivable to say that the Greeks might have seen the Egyptians as parents, for the Egyptians heavily influence Archaic art. Similar to Ancient Egyptian artworks, which focus on permanence and strength, Archaic art lacks movement and fails to represent humanity. As the Ancient Greeks evolved, they developed strong beliefs in clarity and balance. These strong held beliefs were catalysts that encourage the Greeks to hunger for “individuality” as a rebellious teenager. Eventually, this hunger leads to the Classical period (c.440 B.C.), a period of democracy, literacy, advancements in science, and especially Humanistic
The portrayal of the human figure in Greek art makes huge leaps from simple, human-like figures to some of the greatest, most anatomically correct pieces of art. These magnificent feats in the world of art are quickly forgotten when compared to artworks from the Late Roman Empire. When comparing the two artworks of the Spear Bearer and The Four Tetrarchs, it is easy to see how quickly the progress of the Greek artwork was forgotten.
Roman artwork is extremely intricate and diverse, however, a lot of what is referred to as Roman art can better be described by the cultures it conquered. The ancient Greeks were the most influential of these cultures, from their temples and sculptures, to their reliefs and paintings. Greece was the first culture to create major programs for sculpture, painting, and architecture. Many of the first Roman artists were of Greek descent as their artwork reflects the Classical and Hellenistic periods of ancient Greece. A lot of what is considered to be Roman artwork is criticized as being mere copies of Greek artwork since they modeled their forms and styles after the Greeks, but other cultures influenced the Romans as well, mainly the Etruscans,
How politicians have used and still use art to shape the way we see them and see what they want us to see. These politicians have shown their power in their monuments and artwork. Such as the man, who Dr. Spivey said they thought inspired those to build Stonehenge, had power from the gold he was buried with. The film said that this man wanted to show his power with a massive monument, such as Stonehenge, and only someone with great power could have brought together the people to build such a place. For thousands of years the film says that politicians have used art and their faces to entice people to vote for them or follow their rule without starting a war. The King Darius wanted to keep peace over the large number of people he had taken control of. He wanted the people to know that he did not want to be cruel but a fair king. Darius instilled this by using art to show peace for all the people since most couldn’t read. Just like Darius before him, Alexander the Great used art to instill trust and win the hearts of his people. Alexander the Great used his face on busts to show that he was a kind man and a great ruler. Augustus used the same technic in Rome to gain trust from his people, but unlike Alexander the Great, Augustus was a cruel ruler. He did not use his art to be honest and gain trust, he used it to deceive the people. We still today have