Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Louise gluck poem analysis
Annabel lee poem analysis
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
her parents. After I read and re-read and re-read the article “I Stand Here Writing”, it is clearly to see the opinion that the author wants to show us, as a writer, it’s important and necessary to use a different way to think, it will help you to find new characteristics and traits so that we could obtain inspiration to write, and sometimes when we need to compare two things, it help to find new traits and discover the relationship between different experience, ideas that seems unrelated.
Sommers also said that writing is a loss of certainty. If we are supposed to write about what we know, than we can only truly write about ourselves. Imagine there is a poet, the poet can only know her feelings and what possesses those feelings. However,
she cannot be certain that that what she is writing is true for the person she is writing of. And is she being overdramatic when she writes that “his blue eyes are as deep as the ocean”? Of course she is, but can we picture what she is writing, and do we believe her, if only for the moment? Of course we do. The poet is writing what she knows, and what she knows is what she feels, what she perceives about this stranger she is writing about. Know does the poet really, truly believe that the subject in which she is writing about really has blue eyes, no she doesn’t. That’s what makes her writing an extreme change within her beliefs. She dramatizes the knowledge that she possess, making it radical and not certain. How this shows that the “loss if certainty” apply to writing? In writing, we tend to dramatize what is we are writing about. We end up making a change in what we believe by writing something that we don’t believe; or at least we leave the impression that we don’t believe in something that we actually do by writing the contradiction to it. But because we fail utilize the knowledge of what we know is true in our writing and use it correctly. Once we do this, our writing won’t be “a radical loss of certainty”, which it is now. Why is this way now? This is because we just want to get through what we are writing most of the time, or bring drama to what we are writing in order to make it more interesting to readers
Kim Addonizio’s “First Poem for You” portrays a speaker who contemplates the state of their romantic relationship though reflections of their partner’s tattoos. Addressing their partner, the speaker ambivalence towards the merits of the relationship, the speaker unhappily remains with their partner. Through the usage of contrasting visual and kinesthetic imagery, the speaker revels the reasons of their inability to embrace the relationship and showcases the extent of their paralysis. Exploring this theme, the poem discusses how inner conflicts can be powerful paralyzers.
...e does not discuss what she is writing, while she is writing it. She is afraid that if she speaks of it, it will wear out her idea. She says, “If you want to be a writer, I have two pieces of advice. One is to be a reader. I think that's one of the most important parts of learning to write. The other piece of advice is: Just do it! Don't think about it, don't agonize, sit down and write”.
“I write because I love. I write for the survival of self, my children, my family, my community and for the Earth. I write to help keep our stories, our truths, our language alive”. (qtd. in Anthology 396.)
This darkly satiric poem is about cultural imperialism. Dawe uses an extended metaphor: the mother is America and the child represents a younger, developing nation, which is slowly being imbued with American value systems. The figure of a mother becomes synonymous with the United States. Even this most basic of human relationships has been perverted by the consumer culture. The poem begins with the seemingly positive statement of fact 'She loves him ...’. The punctuation however creates a feeling of unease, that all is not as it seems, that there is a subtext that qualifies this apparently natural emotional attachment. From the outset it is established that the child has no real choice, that he must accept the 'beneficence of that motherhood', that the nature of relationships will always be one where the more powerful figure exerts control over the less developed, weaker being. The verb 'beamed' suggests powerful sunlight, the emotional power of the dominant person: the mother. The stanza concludes with a rhetorical question, as if undeniably the child must accept the mother's gift of love. Dawe then moves on to examine the nature of that form of maternal love. The second stanza deals with the way that the mother comforts the child, 'Shoosh ... shoosh ... whenever a vague passing spasm of loss troubles him'. The alliterative description of her 'fat friendly features' suggests comfort and warmth. In this world pain is repressed, real emotion pacified, in order to maintain the illusion that the world is perfect. One must not question the wisdom of the omnipotent mother figure. The phrase 'She loves him...' is repeated. This action of loving is seen as protecting, insulating the child. In much the same way our consumer cultur...
It is fascinating to me to read the articles “Why I Write,” by George Orwell and Joan Didion. These authors touch on so many different topics for their reasons to writing. Their ideals are very much different, but their end results are the same, words on paper for people to read. Both authors made very descriptive points to how their minds wander on and off their writings while trying to write. They both often were writing about what they didn’t want to write about before they actually wrote what they wanted too. In George Orwell’s case, he wrote many things when he was young the he himself would laugh at today, or felt was unprofessional the but if he hadn’t done so he would not of been the writer he became. In Joan Didion’s case she would often be daydreaming about subjects that had nothing to do with what she intended on writing. Her style of writing in this article is actually more interesting because of this. Her mind wandering all over on many different subjects to how her writing came to her is very interesting for a person like me to read. My mind is also very restless on many different unneeded topics before I actually figure some sort of combined way to put words on to paper for people to read. Each author put down in their articles many ways of how there minds work while figuring out what they are going to write about. Both of the authors ended ...
The point the author, Russell Baker, is making in his essay, “Writing for Myself,” is quite evident. When Mr. Fleagle, Baker’s English teacher, assigned an informal essay to be completed as homework, Baker immediately became baffled by the daunting task. Though reluctant to start, Baker knew that it he had to swallow his animosity toward writing and select a topic to write on.
A sword can be as swift as a current or as calm as a still body of water. Whether you use the blade, or the handle; some damage will be made. Poetry is this sword, that once drawn, will always leave a mark. The three poems we read in class, “Not Just A Platform For My Dance”, “The Lonely Land” and “I’m a Canadian”, are all poems regarding Canada. They are also all poems which have a different perspective on what this word Canada means.
Every writer’s personal experience in life is reflected in one way or another in his/her
But both understand that the writer is the reporter of the world. The writer must observe everything around him and make everyone understand the significance of it all. And while they may not see eye to eye about how to go about explaining what defines the role of the writer, they both have done it in their own way and because of it, have become immortalized by the reader and idolized by the writer. Their words have not only taught us all what it means to be a writer, but what a writer is. He is an interpreter of nature. An inspirer of love. A challenger of the status quo. A teacher of society. A representative for the voiceless. And so much
Timothy Winters is a poem about a real, nine-year old boy suffering from poverty in the 1950’s. An English poet named Charles Causley wrote this poem in frustration that the Welfare State was not providing enough support to the underprivileged. To show why he is frustrated, he has written a poem that explores the theme of what it is like to be underprivileged through Timothy Winters perception. This essay explains three examples that are used to communicate the theme and attitude in the poem through the use of the literary techniques; imagery and simile. A simile is used to explain the lack of support from the Welfare State. Imagery is used to describe Timothy’s appearance and the effects of poverty on the condition of where he lives. The theme of Timothy Winters is the life of the underprivileged and Charles Causley’s attitude is frustration.
The notion of writing has been defined in many different ways by writers. According to Byrne (1997), “writing is producing a sequence of sentences arranged in a particular order and linked together in certain ways”. In other words, a writing or a text includes sentences arranged in a coherent and grammatical way to connect the ideas together. In addition, writing is interpreted as the act of expressing ideas, thoughts, and feelings to other people in writing symbols so that readers can
Swimming through the river, like a red bolt of lightning, the salmon tries to find the place it was born at so it can spawn. It has learned this through the species’ trial and error, which is acquiring knowledge, one of the most important parts of a journey. As we’ve seen through many journeys, such as the poem by CP Cavafy “Ithaka”, and the migrations of animals like salmon, beluga whales, and horseshoe crabs, the journey is the most important thing out of an adventure. Although the destination still matters, the journey is where you gain all of your knowledge and your important items from.
The three poets convey the feelings of seriousness, happiness, and failure. In the poem “Simile”, Scott Momaday explains how people and the actions we do are similar to animals in which the comparison was towards deer. In “Moon Rondeau” by Carl Sandburg he illustrates that working together in a relationship, you may be able to accomplish a task and generate a strong bond. In the final poem “Woman” by Nikki Giovanni she displays how one may want to grow and be someone special to your significant other but they may not care of what their other may want. The three poets are illustrating the theme of humans being similar to animals in which case they either work together or they just ignore each other within the literary similarities and differences of the three poems.
“When I sit down to write a book, I do not say to myself ‘I am going to produce a work of art.’ I write because there is some lie I want to expose and some fact I want to draw attention to…”
It is possible to compare and contrast poetry from different literary periods by selecting a poem from each period and examining its use of structure, style, and imagery to enhance its theme. In the Elizabethan period, "Lullaby," by Richard Rowlands; in the Romantic period, Samuel Taylor Coleridge's "Youth and Age;" in the Victorian period, "A Child's Laughter," by Algernon Charles Swinburne; and in the Modern period, Jessica Hagedorn's "Sorcery," the reader will come to the conclusion that they have minor similarities as well as significant differences in the areas of structure, style, theme and imagery.