Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Reflection on leadership character
Reflection on leadership character
Strengths and weaknesses of personal leadership skills
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Reflection on leadership character
By the definition, can you improve if you do not change? This is the question for all the readers by the author before the pages flips subterranean into the subject of the book. Hunter (author) states efficient leadership, is about relationships and values, not bullying power. The focal purpose for this book is dual. First goal is clearly defining servant leadership and second one is providing a plot for execution of servant leadership. Author provides an uncomplicated, straight- forward, three-step change which has been more lucratively employed by factually thousands of leaders to upshot alter in their lives and organizations. In this book one of the principal themes is that "leadership development and character development are intertwined similarly" (Hunter, 2004). The feeling's and the expressions in the book are quite strong and it is a collection of many short stories that are supportive to central premise of the book. Hunter rehearse examples ranging from the U.S. military and professional football to Southwest Airlines and General Electric. The book also extracts religious(Christianity) themes but in a pliable, unfussy way. One sturdy ingredient is Hunter's concentration to the past of diverse administration styles in the 20th century, evaluating what worked at the time and what requirements to revolutionize for our epoch. Since business books have a tendency to be nearsightedly a chronicled, Hunter's flashes of the past are reviving and enlightening. Hunter defines leadership as" The skills of influencing people to enthusiastically work toward goals identified as being for the common good, with character that inspires confidence"(Hunter, 2004). "Administration and leadership are not the sa... ... middle of paper ... ... which is indirect has several negative effects on building trust. One must believe in the leader and believe that his or her word can be trusted. First Law of Leadership: "If you don't believe in the messenger, you won't believe the message." (Hunter, 2004) Author adds human nature verses leadership, values, morals and ethics fluctuate significantly among culture and over time and principle are self-evident. Hunter summarizes human nature by introducing a moral muscle which is a psychological trait, that gives people courage, will and strength to do right one though humans are more flexible to other side of coin. The moral muscle name is nothing but character of a particular person , if developed and strengthened over time, enables human beings to put principle ahead of self and to rise above self-interest and immediate gratification(Hunter, 2004).
In the short story “The Hunter” the author Richard Stark introduces Parker, the main character of this book. The main character is a rough man, he’s a criminal, a murderer, and even an escaped convict. He’s described as crude and rugged and though women are frightened by him, they want him. Parker is not the classic criminal, but rather he’s intelligent, hard, and cunning. In this story the author carefully appeals to his audience by making a loathsome criminal into a hero, or rather, an anti-hero. The author, Richard Stark uses ethical appeal to make his audience like Parker through the use of phronesis, arête, altruism and lastly the ethos of his audience.
“How to Talk to a Hunter,” Houston uses tone along with mood, ambiguity, and archetype in order to convey the theme of a
more actions, all of which you have the ability to perform.” (What Is a Moral Dilemma, 2015?).
The theory reduces the expectations from the leader, instead focuses on matching the leader to a task
“Do as I say, not as I do” say’s the parent to the child who is watching their every move. Leaders may not say it, but their actions show inconsistencies in their leadership. How can leaders truly be trusted is they are not willing to change themselves? How can leaders breakthrough the wall of resistance if they are not willing to engage their employees, dispel the fear factor, and allow themselves to be vulnerable?
them, it is fundamental to search for them , because virtues are voluntary acquired, we are not
Servant leadership is becoming a more “sought-after” concept in today’s society, but what exactly is servant leadership? Does it mean different things to different people? Although the three books, The Servant as Leader, The Servant, and Lead Like Jesus, all center around servant leadership, each author takes a different perspective on the meaning of being a servant leader. Robert Greenleaf addresses leadership from a straight-forward stance; saying that a good leader must be a servant-first by finding the will within themselves to put the needs of their group before their own. James Hunter discusses servant leadership through a story involving everyday people that the reader can relate to. He uses Jesus as a guide to explain how to initiate character development that will, in turn, fashion servant leadership. Ken Blanchard and Phil Hodges offer a new perspective on servant leadership by bringing Jesus into the picture on an even deeper level than Hunter. They explain that by knowing Jesus Christ and developing an intimate personal
Servant leadership is an approach that goes against most leadership styles because it has the lead being the servant to their followers. This style of leadership wants the leader to be focused on the needs of their followers, empower their followers, and help realize their full capabilities.
Lastly, the key to successful leadership is getting all of one’s followers on their side. In order to achieve this, leaders must gain all their followers trust. Bennis outlines four key elements to gain this trust. Primarily, constancy must be enforced. Leaders must stay the course. Second, congruity is essential. This is so the leaders can “walk the talk.” Third, reliability is needed so that leaders are present when it matters most. Lastly, leaders honor their commitments through integrity. All of these important, aspects gain the trust of their followers by their side.
The two most intriguing leadership styles presented in the readings were transformational leadership and servant leadership. Both leadership styles are relationship-oriented, that is, in order for these leadership styles to be effective, positive relationships must exist between leaders and followers. Also, both leadership styles reject the role of leader as being reserved for those individuals in designated positions of power, but rather a quality that may be exhibited by any individual (Kelly, 2012, pp. 10-11). However, the differing goals of each leadership style is the seemingly critical factor that separates transformational leadership from servant leadership.
Once they have such trust from the people surrounding them, not only does it show that they care, but at the same time it shows that he or she are can be compassionate about them. They’re showing the people that they’re not too busy focusing on themselves being leaders but rather showing that they can be trustworthy. The people (the “followers”) will see that the leader cares for them, because they take time to recognize them (for instance their strengths and weaknesses) and acknowledge whichever their concerns may be, and by doing so, that’ll help the people understand that their not just working with an overbearing person but rather realize that they’re working with a trustworthy and compassionate “friend,” the one who will have them in mind when making important decisions. All of this will lead the people to do their jobs efficiently and bring out the best in them as
Enable Others to Act – leaders actively engage individuals and make an effort to generate an ambience of trust and self-esteem.
P2: The ability to make right moral choices requires the ability to do something wrong.
A leader can’t simply say – trust me, trust takes time to build. People trust us when they see some value in us. When we take care of others, sacrifice something, show value to something, or do something for others? Its then we are valued by others and trust is gained from it.
An individual's internal values have the capacity to persuade them into doing what they otherwise wouldn’t be inclined to do. These sacrifices are made in the name of the "Greater Good", when a person's ideals lead them to visualize only what they want to protect, rather than themselves. Often humans are perceived as a selfish species, but as other species do, we also have protective instincts, and when those instincts kick in, we have the capacity to be remarkably self-abnegating. Self-abnegation is a quality that all of us obtain for something, but that something depends entirely on our person's values. Our values are the motivator for sacrificing ourselves. This selfless quality reveals itself when the circumstances