Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Media representation on gender
Analysis of the movie hidden figures
Women's portrayal in the media
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Media representation on gender
preferred the book “Hidden Figures” rather than the movie representation of the story. The main reasons why I favored the book over the movie representation because the book gave more explicit details on the characters and their lives. Another reason is that the movie didn’t give us the full story. Also, the movie based its plot are adjusted to make the movie more appears to viewers. In the following paragraphs, I will explain the judgment I created. The first reason I will explain is that the book gave more explicit details. I say this because in the movie they seem to only talk about the great things that these women but, in the book, it talked more about their personal lives. On page 107-108 it talks about what happens to Katherine's husband’s cause of death. “Ultimately, his doctors discovered a tumor on the base of his skull, where it could not be treated.” In the movie, I don’t recall them explaining the death of her husband only that he died. Secondly, in the book they gave us a more detail on the events happening during the time period these women were working in. On page 83 it talks about how people were accused of spying “An engineer was accused of stealing classified National Advisory Committee for Aeronautics …show more content…
documents and giving them to the Soviet Union.” This is only one way they talk about current events another piece of evidence is on page 14 “ A civil rights leader named A.
Philip Randolph encouraged President Roosevelt to sign an executive order a law that ordered the segregation of the federal government and defense industry created the fair employment practices community.” This sentence talks about the executive order which impacted this story in a big way. In the movie, they just stated a few points in only one scene. In one scene Al Harrison (“Boss” of NASA) asked Katherine Johnson If she was a Russian spy that's the only thing that I recall they talked about with current events. Lastly, they changed the
story's plot a little to make the movie seem more appealing. I say this because in the movie they wanted to focus on the love story of Katherine Johnson (Near the middle of the movie) and they also wanted to talk about the empowering things that these women did. In addition, I don’t utterly believe that this is a bad idea, but it seemed to me that they added more emphasize on Katherine's love life rather than what these incredible women did and segregation. To sum up, the book gives us more detail and facts behind the characters rather than the movie gives us a limited amount of details which is important to the reader/ moviegoer. Secondly, the movie didn’t give us exactly the same details that are crucial to comprehending the struggle that African Americans had to face not only that but gender inequality. Finally, the movie and its plot are adjusted to make the movie more appears to viewers. Inclusion, I believe the book was far superior to the movie representation of the story.
This is my view on the movie and book. I likes the movie better the book because the
Second there is more detail in the book than the movie. Well, I think that more detail is better because the more you know the better you understand the movie or
I like the reading book better than watching the movie because there are more facts in the book than the movie. Maybe I just like reading books better than watching movies. That’s my opinion. What’s yours (if you’ve read the book and seen the movie)?
Humans are funny creatures. We judge and classify others and ourselves into groups. We tear apart others esteem to feel stronger. And we put limits on ourselves, whether they are thought up by our imagination or other’s. The truth is, we aren’t perfect, but we can become better, that is, if we choose to. Benchwarmers captures that thought perfectly. Though it is a comedy, and a very hilarious one at that, it provides some very true points to consider. Benchwarmers is a great movie to watch because within this side-splittingly funny movie, there are important messages such as: bullying is a double edged sword, stereotypes can be overcome, and that diversity is what makes life exciting.
In conclusion, details involving the characters and symbolic meanings to objects are the factors that make the novel better than the movie. Leaving out aspects of the novel limits the viewer’s appreciation for the story. One may favor the film over the novel or vice versa, but that person will not overlook the intense work that went into the making of both. The film and novel have their similarities and differences, but both effectively communicate their meaning to the public.
In the movie, they missed things or changed parts, but they also quoted the book quiet a lot and make the story more a like. Most of the most important parts were in the movie. They missed one of the camps that Corrie was sent to and the didn’t show much of the 100th year party of the watch shop besides a picture. I liked the book way more than the movie because the book had more detail and made you understand what that part of WWII was like more than the movie does. In the book Corrie is learning how to have more faith and trust in God more but in the movie, she had a lot of faith the whole time and she didn’t struggle with that as much. I enjoyed reading about that because it made me feel like I’m not the only one that struggles.
Overall, the movie and book have many differences and similarities, some more important than others. The story still is clear without many scenes from the book, but the movie would have more thought in it.
1 Corinthians 9: 25-27 states “All athletes are disciplined in their training. They do it to win a prize that will fade away, but we do it for an eternal prize. So I run with purpose in every step. I am not just shadowboxing. I discipline my body like an athlete, training it to do what it should. Otherwise, I fear that after preaching to others I myself might be disqualified” (NLT).
Sex, love, depression, guilt, trust, all are topics presented in this remarkably well written and performed drama. The Flick, a 2014 Pulitzer Prize winning drama by Annie Baker, serves to provide a social commentary which will leave the audience deep in thought well after the curtain closes. Emporia State Universities Production of this masterpiece was a masterpiece in itself, from the stunningly genuine portrayal of the characters of Avery and Rose, to the realism found within the set, every aspect of the production was superb.
The 2009 movie Food Inc. describes the major role that food production plays within many lives. This movie revealed that there is a very small variety of companies that consumers purchase their food from. These few companies actually control what is out on the shelves and what we put into our bodies. These companies have changed food production into a food production business. Many of these companies experiment with ways to create large quantities of food at low production costs to result in an enormous amount of profit for themselves. Some of the production cost cuts also result in less healthy food for the population. Instead of worrying about the health of the population, the companies are worried about what will make them the most money.
In the documentary “Fed Up,” sugar is responsible for Americas rising obesity rate, which is happening even with the great stress that is set on exercise and portion control for those who are overweight. Fed Up is a film directed by Stephanie Soechtig, with Executive Producers Katie Couric and Laurie David. The filmmaker’s intent is mainly to inform people of the dangers of too much sugar, but it also talks about the fat’s in our diets and the food corporation shadiness. The filmmaker wants to educate the country on the effects of a poor diet and to open eyes to the obesity catastrophe in the United States. The main debate used is that sugar is the direct matter of obesity. Overall, I don’t believe the filmmaker’s debate was successful.
The book and the movie were both very good. The book took time to explain things like setting, people’s emotions, people’s traits, and important background information. There was no time for these explanations the movie. The book, however, had parts in the beginning where some readers could become flustered.
At this point, the readers create their own movie in a way. They will determine important aspects of how the character speaks, looks like, and reacts. Whereas, in the movie, the reader has no choice but to follow the plot laid out in front of them. No longer can they picture the characters in their own way or come up with their different portrayals. The fate of the story, while still unpredictable, was highly influenced by the way the characters looked, spoke, and presented themselves on screen.
Hidden Figures is a movie based on the true story of three pioneering African American women whose calculations for NASA were helpful to several historic space missions, including John Glenn’s successful orbit of the Earth. The Movie was set in 1960, where a lot of historical events were happening, such as the Space race between two initial rivals of the Cold War (The United States, and Russia). Also, Women and African-Americans were discriminated Against during the 60’s, but that did not stop Katherine Johnson, Mary Jackson, and Dorothy Vaughan from advancing and accomplishing what they accomplished. After all they did not only help themselves advance, they helped America advance. Hidden Figures was a very accurate film of how it was in the 1960 and how these three women went with their intelligence rather than their ego.
Gran Torino is an interesting portrayal of communication dilemmas, spread out across several characters and in particular that of main character Walt Kowalski. After the death of his wife, Walt is bombarded with unwanted attention from several angles and attempts to “deal” with the attention to the best of his ability. There are many examples of communication struggles in the film, but they all seem to follow a similar pattern, and that is distance in time and culture. I’d like to focus on some of these communication barriers between his family, neighbors and priest and see how some of these walls got broken down, or could have been removed more easily.