Henry John Spayde's Learning In The Key Of Life

1255 Words3 Pages

Today education has an endless amount of definitions which are correct in certain aspects of society, but most leave out the one part of education that is truly vital. That is the concept of real life experiences. The debate on what it means to be educated has been going on for centuries, yet the answer isn’t esoteric at all! The scintillating Henry David Thoreau amazed scholars of his philosophy that one simply doesn’t just go to school to be educated, but one has to experience the world in order to be prepared for it. He lived in a small house on Walden Pond and lived off of the land. He quoted “I went to the woods because I wished to live deliberately, to front only the essential facts of life, and see if I could not learn what it had to …show more content…

Imagine if students were taught only formal education in school? In Spayde’s article, Learning in the Key of Life, he is saying that people will be anti-social in life if they are only taught formal education. Spayde uses Nietzsche, a German philosopher, who says that “Metaphysics are in the street”. According to Nietzsche, metaphysics mean “those final problems of the human condition: death, loneliness, the meaning of existence, the desire for power, hope, and despair.” Nietzsche proves that you can only learn the meaning of life through personal experiences and repertoire. Jon Spayde uses Nietzsche to prove that one simply can’t learn metaphysics in the classroom. This infers that if one goes to private school all their life, they will become anti-social and not get along in the real world. Spayde proves his argument that you need both personal experiences and formal education “to be educated” by taking one of the factors out which then shows that one wouldn’t fit into

Open Document