Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Importance of diversity in education
Benefits of diversity in college
Importance of diversity in education
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Welcome to the University of Sheltering Students, where the cost is high, and the education is low. It is where life is taught through a textbook, but is not actually taught at all. Some universities in the 21st century are being forced to rid the campuses of words, ideas, and subjects that might create tension, discomfort, or offense to the students that pay to learn there. Twenty-first century students are beginning to become a more sheltered society, where an uncovered truth is difficult to come by. University education explains the basics of school; such as the Periodic Table, how to write an essay, and how letters magically appear in math equations. Conversely, it does not even touch upon any subject that could be deemed “controversial”; …show more content…
including, woman’s rights, rape culture, and religion. However, the world is full of controversy, and the universities are unfortunately conforming to the student’s demands to be sheltered from it. Students prefer to hide from the truth rather than educate themselves and expand their knowledge. A true university or college education to the students could help fix the problems our world faces today, but instead we choose to pretend these problems do not exist. A university education should teach the students about the real world, rather than sheltering them from it. The Duke Controversy is an example of a university trying to expand the student’s mind, while students remain focused on remaining sheltered from different views of the world. Duke University’s class of 2019 was faced with controversy while given the opportunity to read, Fun Home, by Alison Bechdel. Fun Home is a book that focuses on Bechdel’s parents, and their role in her life. Bechdel writes about the events leading to and resulting in her father's death. Some of the students felt uncomfortable reading the book, due to religious or moral beliefs, and turned to boycotting the book, rather than learning from it. This action was extremely unnecessary. The summer reading, for one, was not mandatory. There would not have been any test, or any grades for reading the book. According to Duke’s Vice President for Public Affairs, Michael Schoenfeld, “The summer reading is entirely voluntary - it is not a requirement, nor is there a grade or record of any student's participation. With a class of 1,750 new students from around the world, it would be impossible to find a single book that did not challenge someone's way of thinking” (Duke11). Reading, Fun Home, was completely up to the student. Fun Home was part of the Common Experience summer reading program. The program allowed the students to find a common book that all (or most) of the freshmen class would engage in. This would allow the first year students to feel more comfortable when it came to their English and literature courses. Furthermore, college is probably the best opportunity in life to experience growth and diversity. College is not for sheltering students from the world, and it is not for verification of the student’s faith either. College is supposed to allow the student to expand their understanding of the world around them, and to teach the student how to survive in the world we live in. Along with the controversy at Duke University, Mark Edmundson’s article, “Who Are You and What Are You Doing Here”, argues what a university education is supposed to teach, rather than what it actually teaches.
The article states, “Education is about finding out what form of work for you is close to being play- work you do so easily that it restores you as you go” (8). Edmundson believes education should help someone find exactly what he or she wants to do with their life. Education should not limit a student of finding who they are or how they can help our world, just because another student feels uncomfortable with the subject. A higher education should be for learning about the world we live in, yet students demand shelter and run from the truth. Edmundson explained in his article, “The idea that the courses you take should be the primary objective of going to college is tacitly considered absurd” (3). In other words: partying, clubs, and friends are found to be more important than classes while at school. Anyone who thinks the courses taken are more important than having a good time are considered out of the ordinary. Edmundson wants to be influenced, taught new things, and “thrown off [his] course and onto another, better way” (6) while reading. Many twenty first century students would find this absurd. Any Twenty First century student who wants to learn the truth will have to fight for edification. They will have to be assertive and aggressive in order to get a true education. If they do not, then they will not get the opportunity to obtain an education that could help not only their future, but the future of others. Learning about the problems our world faces would help students fix the problems, instead of turning heads away from the issues at hand. Lives can be saved if students just listen, learn and
act. Higher education, according to Lukianoff and Haidt, should stay away from sheltering students and should, instead, show the truth about the real world. In the article, “The Coddling of the American Mind,” by Lukianoff and Haidt, it was stated, “rather than trying to protect students from words and ideas that they will inevitably encounter, colleges should do all they can to equip students to thrive in a world full of words and ideas that they cannot control” (24). Students believe trigger warnings should be used in schools. Trigger warnings are alerts that professors use if a certain subject may cause distress or an emotional response. Students believe the trigger warnings will protect themselves from uncomfortable topics and words. Unfortunately for the students, life itself does not come with trigger warnings. Eventually the students will have to leave school and will enter the real world. If they keep insisting on being sheltered from the truth of the real world, then they will be blindsided when they enter the world on their own for the first time. Since the education they gained from university or college never set them on track for the real world, they have to learn the truth on their own, which could pose even more difficult than it would have been in school. Duke University is trying to show their students the real world through Bechdel’s book, but students prefer to be coddled. The students do not want to learn about anything that would possibly go against their moral or religious beliefs. Universities are caving in to the student’s demands, when they should be standing up for their own expectations. Students are going to learn the truth of the world one way or another. They can either learn about it first in the safe environment of school, or they can be forced into in when they have to see the truth face to face. Universities are supposed to teach students what life is all about. Life is much more complex than what can fit inside of a textbook. If a textbook can explain some part of life in only a few sentences, then the authors of the book did not explain it correctly. Life cannot be explained in only a few chapters. If university education only sticks to what can be taught in a book without causing controversy, then nothing about the world we live in will truly be taught to the students. The words on the pages will be wasted if the truth cannot be expelled. Sometimes, life can be explicit, and the students need to realize that life itself does not come with any trigger warnings. There are no “watch out” moments in real life. Once a student graduates from a university, they will have to face the world on their own. The students might as well learn how to do that, and what to expect from the world in a safe environment, rather than being forced to dive right in. A university education should be honest and true. The education should entail everything our world encompasses, and should not be held back from one student because of another student’s discomfort. If a student is uncomfortable, then they have the option to sit out, but they should never have the right to take an education away from another student.
Today education has an endless amount of definitions which are correct in certain aspects of society, but most leave out the one part of education that is truly vital. That is the concept of real life experiences. The debate on what it means to be educated has been going on for centuries, yet the answer isn’t esoteric at all! The scintillating Henry David Thoreau amazed scholars of his philosophy that one simply doesn’t just go to school to be educated, but one has to experience the world in order to be prepared for it. He lived in a small house on Walden Pond and lived off of the land. He quoted “I went to the woods because I wished to live deliberately, to front only the essential facts of life, and see if I could not learn what it had to
The Purpose of education to Cornel West is for you to think for yourself and to find yourself. Cornel West also thinks that college is more than just having A great job, fancy cars & nice clothes it's deeper than the materialistic things. college isn't just about Getting a great job and moving up in that job it's about learning education and learning why you are in college. Also, he speaks on unavailable health care and child care which is the deeper issue of what is going on in society. People are worried about superficial items rather than the important issues on not being able to afford health care and child care. The point Cornel west is trying to make is education should unsettle you which means that the things that you may believe or
As a young girl in school, I always believed that I would one day would be successful and had the hope that a college education would assist me in being successful. I exceled in school even with circumstances such as hurricane Katrina and September 11 and had a thirst for knowledge. At the same time, the teachers that influenced me in life convinced me to attend college for the betterment of knowledge and a potential for a job or a career. However, those same teachers were teaching me textbook methods and no real on hand training that is essential in an education especially a college education. In "Vocation or Exploration? Pondering the Purpose of College”, Alina Tugend ponders the idea of college being either Vocation—job training— or Exploration learning. She starts off by referring to her oldest son is about to graduate high school, but quickly goes straight to the point of her essay with “What exactly is a university education for?” She provides answers such as college is a way to automatically receive a job if one majors in science, technology or a major that can be applied to a changing world that we live
In a society where a collegiate degree is almost necessary to make a successful living, the idea that a student cares less about the education and more about the “college experience” can seem baffling. In My Freshman Year: What a Professor Learned by Becoming a Student, Rebekah Nathan, the author’s pseudonym, tackles the idea that academics are less impactful on a student then the culture of college life. Nathan, a 50-year-old cultural anthropologist and university professor, went undercover as a college freshman for a research project. From her research, she hoped to better understand the undergraduate experience by fully immersing herself in college life. To do this, she anonymously applied to “AnyU,” a fake acronym for a real university,
American’s education system has been entering crisis mode for a long time. Throughout the past few years, the overwhelming question “Is college needed or worth it?” While it is an opinion, there are facts that back up each answer. Plato’s “Allegory of the Cave” mentions that the enlightened must help the unenlightened and further their knowledge. The problem with America today is that high school students are given the option of college and that makes for less enlightened people. While it is possible to learn in the work force or Army, college is a better option. Mary Daly wrote the article “Is It Still Worth Going to College?” which talks about the statistical value of attending. Michelle Adam wrote the article “Is College Worth It?” which mentions the struggle young people are going through to even get into college. Caroline Bird wrote the chapter “Where College Fails Us” in her book The Case Against College where she
The essay starts off with Murray saying of course more people be encouraged to go to college then countering with a yes and no to the question. He agrees that yes getting a education is important but majority of people are going for what they should have learned years before reaching the college level. The way people see college as a way to be success doesn't sit well with him as he gives many reasons to why this is false. The statement "college is seen as a open sesame to a good job and desirable way for adolescents to transition to adulthood." proves this point. He argues that yes getting a education is important but it's not always the best way. The hypothetical example involving a student choosing to go college for business or becoming a electrician. Then giving a example of why he would be probably be better off becoming the electrician rather than going to college to do something he may not be as successful as he could've been if he worked as a electrician helps prove his point. Murray continues to argue that the view about college is flawed that many are better off looking for better options rather than following the crowd and going to college.
The right and privilege to higher education in today’s society teeters like the scales of justice. In reading Andrew Delbanco’s, “College: What It Was, Is, and Should Be, it is apparent that Delbanco believes that the main role of college is to accommodate that needs of all students in providing opportunities to discover individual passions and dreams while furthering and enhancing the economic strength of the nation. Additionally, Delbanco also views college as more than just a time to prepare for a job in the future but a way in which students and young adults can prepare for their future lives so they are meaningful and purposeful. Even more important is the role that college will play in helping and guiding students to learn how to accept alternate point of views and the importance that differing views play in a democratic society. With that said, the issue is not the importance that higher education plays in society, but exactly who should pay the costly price tag of higher education is a raging debate in all social classes, cultures, socioeconomic groups and races.
In recent discussions of "Is College Worth It?" by John Green, a controversial issue has been weather-attending college worth it or not? On the one hand, some argue that colleges are not worth attending because it is too expensive and they do not need a degree to get a good job. From this perspective, many people do not apply to a college. On the other hand, however, others insist that college is worth attending because it is expanding the knowledge and give more opportunity to find jobs. In the words of John Green one of this view 's proponents, " Education gave me perspective and context." According to this view, college is worth to apply for because it enlarges the information that people have and expands their knowledge. In sum, then, the
In recent years, many have debated whether or not a college education is a necessary requirement to succeed in the field of a persons’ choice and become an outstanding person in society. On one hand, some say college is very important because one must contribute to society. The essay Three Reasons College Still Matters by Andrew Delbanco shows three main reasons that students should receive their bachelor’s degree. On the other hand, many question the point of wasting millions of dollars on four years or maybe more to fight for highly competitive jobs that one might not get. Louis Menand wrote an article based on education titled Re-Imagining Liberal Education. This article challenges the main thought many americans have after receiving a secondary education. Louis Menand better illustrates the reasons why a student should rethink receiving a post secondary education better than Andrew Delbanco’s three reasons to continue a person’s education.
Murray believes that students should receive a liberal education, yet they should not have to wait until college to do so (Murray 225). Murray states that a person should not be forced to obtain a college-level liberal education, simply because they are capable of doing so (Murray 228). On higher education, Murray says, “A large proportion of people who are theoretically able to absorb a liberal education have no interest in doing so.” (Murray 228). Regardless of the fact that a person fits the criteria enabling them to pursue a college degree, does not necessarily mean that they should, if they are not interested. It is more logical to teach students extensively before the time of college, instead of leaving out information and forcing them to attend a school (Murray 225). However, Addison disagrees with this ideology, and believes that a college education is essential to growing up.
Imagine turning into someone unrecognizable and watching as your life rips apart, a life that you worked so hard for, because all hope is lost. You have hit the bottom of “the well of life”, and deep inside this “well of life” you understand it’s all because of students.
What does he mean by this? Perhaps confronting your professors? Edmundson states, "The students and the professors have made a deal: Neither of them has to throw himself heart and soul into what happens in the classroom" (Edmundson 408). This is one idea of Edmonson's that I disagree with. Not all students and professors act as if they don't care about the curriculum, sometimes both students and professors actually care and want to learn or teach to the best of their ability. The author emphasizes this idea of fighting a lot throughout the article and I believe that is him trying to prove that point. Some examples are when he constantly brings up the idea of professors not teaching to the best of their ability or even students not doing the best that they can to learn. As a college student, I can relate a bit to this idea of having to fight. In the beginning of my first semester of college, my classes along with the professors were not the best. I think that Edmundson means that when you fight, you are not targeting the whole institute which you attend, but more specifically, the
He says that it is hard to get students to learn because they have more freedom than they had when they were in school. Students do not have their parents with them to motivate them. Students are more focused on having fun than they are with learning. If students do not learn then they will struggle when it’s time to actually get a job. The author says that they will exhibit the same lack of motivation in their careers. If students do not go to college to learn, then it will actually be a waste of time and money, and they will not get anything out of their career.
Light, J. R. (2001). Making the most of college: Students speak their minds. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
In our culture today, there is a huge emphasis on education, especially higher education. Society basically says the more educated you are, the better off you are. That is pretty much true if you live by the means of society. The basic idea that education, especially a college education, is something that people should pursue even into their adult years is not by any means a new idea.