Happiness Reflection Paper

939 Words2 Pages

A formal definition of happiness can be approached from several perspectives. It can mean the common feeling of living well or flourishing. Happiness is a feeling of completeness and sufficient good. This implies that happiness is desired for itself and not for the sake of anything else. Nowadays happiness is something everybody wants to achieve but has different views on what elements happiness should consist of. Happiness satisfies all the desires and does not have any evil in it and it is, therefore, stable. In one of his many theories, Aristotle mentions a life full of pleasure and comfort, a life characterized by money making, a philosophical life and a life of action as not being the ways to happiness. Aristotle had his own idea about …show more content…

Aristotle uses the word “Eudaimonia” as a term for happiness. He makes some assumptions on how a human soul behaves. It means human flouring. It does not mean pleasure or a mental state because he claimed that happiness is a form of life. Aristotle divided it into one part that reasons, a part that is guided by reason, and one more part that is unresponsive to reason. He, therefore, implies that there are virtues that will have a reason as their substance while reason will guide others as their subject. For instance, the some country in the middle-east gives the announcement to the residents that civil war has no remains anymore. All residents must be happy and starts having new life from now on. In fact, they would not say that they will live in a happy life. It just something that people desired for its own sake. Aristotle claims that not real happiness but people just desired for its own. Human being tries everything to pursue the happiness, and believes that it will be completed. He concludes that virtues are soul’s habits by which one acts well for the sake of what is noble or

Open Document