Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Financial statement fraud
Financial statements fraud cases
Case study on financial statement fraud
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Financial statement fraud
Le-Nature was a Latrobe Pennsylvania based beverage maker owned by Gregory Podlucky, who is now serving a 20 year prison sentence in New Jersey’s Ft. Dix Federal Corrections Institute. Gregory Podlucky was the admitted ring leader, but in all 5 people plead guilty and another 3 took their chances at trial, where they were all found guilty as well. Le-Nature went into bankruptcy in 2006, and 3 years later they were indicted by the federal government being accused of scamming investors and banks out of more than 800 million dollars. The accounting fraud was an elaborate Ponzi scheme and financial statement fraud. Company officials created false documents, invoices, customer checks, and statements to record activity that never occurred. …show more content…
Taking a look at Donald Cressey’s hypotheses which is now known as the fraud triangle depicts the certain criteria for the mind frame of the fraudster. The fraud triangle is a theory that consists of perceived pressures, perceived opportunity, and rationalization. It gives us the different pressures placed on individuals that would make them consider “cooking the books.” It also demonstrates where the possible opportunity lies so that we may take precautions to eliminate the opportunity. Last, it demonstrates how a fraudster rationalizes with themselves to make committing the fraud okay. Donald Cressey believes all three elements must be present for fraud to occur. Upper management is usually the focus of financial statement fraud because financial statements are done at the management level. So in this case financial statement fraud was committed by the CEO Gregory Podlucky …show more content…
But the stakeholders play a very important role in preventing and deterring fraud. Stakeholders includes customers, suppliers, employees, the community and the government. Each play an important role since they have an interest in the integrity of financial reports of the publicly-traded company. Employees have a vested interest in the company’s success and they have a responsibility to protect their interest. Their roles may start from the bottom but they are key players in the company. To help deter or prevent financial statement fraud, the employee must report financial reporting fraud if it is detected. This can be done by way of a vigorous whistleblower program of some other tip line provided by the company. The community and its members, including the news media, can play a regulator role by confirming that the company is a good citizen with fair business practices. Shareholders should make sure that any company in which they’d like to invest is in compliance with standards of oversight and ethics. Investors need to play and active role also. They should be actively involved by monitoring the companies in which they invest. They should attend shareholder’s meeting regularly to discuss concerns and check the books of the company. This will allow them to stay current with what is going on within the company. Shareholders should always remain vigilant and make
Pressler, J. (2010, June 14). Wachovia Executive Embezzled Millions for Love of Tropical Flora -- Daily Intel. New York Magazine -- NYC Guide to Restaurants, Fashion, Nightlife, Shopping, Politics, Movies. Retrieved January 14, 2012, from http://nymag.com/daily/intel/2010/06/wachovia_executive_who_embezzl.html
Madura, Jeff. What Every Investor Needs to Know About Accounting Fraud. New York: McGraw-Hill, 2004. 1-156
Received an A- on this paper, United States History, DePaul University, put almost twenty hours into, most I write in four-five hours, very proud of this piece.
In modern day business, there can be so many pressures that can cause managers to commit fraud, even though it often starts as just a little bit at first, but will spiral out of control with time. In the case of WorldCom, there were several pressures that led executives and managers to “cook the books.” Much of WorldCom’s initial growth and success was due to acquisitions. Over time, WorldCom discovered that there were no more opportunities for growth through acquisitions when the U.S. Department of Justice disallowed the acquisition of Sprint.
Hence, the stakeholders which are described as those who are affected by the organisation performance ,actions and duties and those actions includes employees, clients, local community and investors as well. The theory of stakeholders also suggests that it is the responsibility of firm to make sure no rights of stakeholders are dishonoured and make decisions in the interest of stakeholders which is also the purpose of stakeholder theory to make more profit and balancing it while considering its stakeholders (Freeman 2008 pp. 162-165). In the other words organisation must also operates in a more socially accountable approach by carrying out corporate social responsibility as (CSR) activities.
Stakeholders are those groups or individual in society that have a direct interest in the performance and activities of business. The main stakeholders are employees, shareholders, customers, suppliers, financiers and the local community. Stakeholders may not hold any formal authority over the organization, but theorists such as Professor Charles Handy believe that a firm’s best long-term interests are served by paying close attention to the needs of each of these stakeholders. The modern view is that a firm has responsibilities to all its stakeholders i.e. everyone with a legitimate interest in the company. These include shareholders, competitors, government, employees, directors, distributors, customers, sub-contractors, pressure groups and local community. Although a company’s directors owes a legal duty to the shareholders, they also have moral responsibilities to other stakeholder group’s objectives in their entirely. As a firm can’t meet all stakeholders’ objectives in their entirety, they have to compromise. A company should try to serve the needs of these groups or individuals, but whilst some needs are common, other needs conflict. By the development of this second runway, the public and stakeholders are affected in one or other way and it can be positive and negative.
Regarding to organizational stakeholders, there are three main groups of stakeholders: customers, employees and investors. The company attempts to link stakeholders’ needs and expectations to the company’s goals. For customers, the company must treat them fairly and honestly. For employees, the company needs to treat them fairly, make them a part of the company and respect their needs. For investor, managers should comply with the accounting procedure, do not manip...
Giroux, G. (Winter 2008). What went wrong? Accounting fraud and lessons from the recent scandals. Social Research, 75, 4. p.1205 (34). Retrieved June 16, 2011, from Academic OneFile via Gale:
Accounting fraud refers to fraud that is committed by a company by maintaining false information about the sales and income in the company books, when overstating the company's assets or profits, when a company is actually undergoing a loss. These fraudulent records are then used to seek investment in the company's bond or security issues. By showing these false entries, the company attempts to apply fraudulent loan applications as a final attempt to save the company by obtaining more money from bankruptcy. Accounting frauds is actually done to hide the company’s actual financial issues.
The Tyco accounting scandal is an ideal illustration of how individuals who hold key positions in an organization are able to manipulate accounting practices and financial reports for personal gain. The few key individuals involved in the Tyco Scandal (CEO Kozlowski and CFO Swartz), used a number of clever and unique tactics in order to accomplish what they did; including spring loading, manipulating their ‘key-employee loan’ program, and multiple ‘hush money’ payouts.
Indiana University graduate Donald R. Cressey’s (1919-1987) study of occupational fraud and abuse breaks down the reason why the “trust violators” or embezzlers committed the crime. By interviewing 200 inmates convicted of the crime of embezzling, he produced a hypothesis that is known today as the fraud triangle. The fraud triangle represents the factors that cause an employee to commit fraud which include, Opportunity, pressure and rationalization. (Wells, 2014) Cressey described that nonshareable financial problems or the pressures that causes the employee to commit the crime play a crucial role in understanding the crime. Through the interview process, Cressey discovered that the participates fell in the following six categories; violations
In December 2008 one of the biggest fraudulent schemes, better known as a Ponzi scheme was discovered and shocked the United States. The person whom committed this scheme was Bernard Madoff or Bernie as his friends called him. At that time he was a well- respected financier until he scheme his investors out of more than $65 million for over a decade (Yang, 2014). What is a Ponzi scheme? Let me explain. A Ponzi scheme works like a pyramid scheme. What Madoff was is take money from new investors to pay earnings for existing customers without actually investing the money (Ferrell, Fraedrich, & Ferrell, 2015). Ponzi schemes were name after a man name Charles Ponzi who in the 20th century saw a way to profit from international reply coupons,
Organizations that only have top management as the board members are more susceptible to accounting malpractices. Members of the board should preferably own shares in the company to ensure diligence when it comes to the interests of the company. Apart from the Board of Governors, there should also be an audit committee in place to oversee the financial dealings of the bank. Members of the board and the audit committee should have basic financial knowledge. Some of the members should also be experts in finances so that they can detect any anomaly that may take place in terms of financial reporting. An overhaul of the regulatory framework is required to empower authorities to intervene immediately, and make improvements. New technology is required. Manual antiquated processes should be eliminated because this causes greater human error and poor
In order to guarantee the auspicious ethical behaviour within the organisation is sustained, Public Bank Berhad has been relying on the “Fit and Proper” policies under the corporate governance (Public Bank Berhad, 2014). There are various policies included, and the formation of the policies is to assist in maintaining the integrity and reputation of the business. For instance, there is ‘Anti-Fraud Policy’ which would prevent any fraud, or any attempts on doing so from happening. If such things occur, the whistle-blowers would be able to report such crime to the authorities.
Fraud and white-collar crime are common forms of crimes that people commit in various aspects and positions in the corporate world. Fraud and white-collar crimes have similar meaning as they refer to the non-violent crimes that people commit with the basic objective of gaining money using illegal means. The cases of white-collar crimes have been increasing exponentially in the 21st century due to the advent of technology because fraudsters apply technological tools in cheating, swindling, embezzling, and defrauding people or organizations. White-collar crime is a complex issue in society because its occurrence is dependent on many factors such as organizational structure, organization culture, and personality traits. Thus, the literature review examines how organizational structure, organizational culture, and personality traits contribute to the occurrence of white-collar crimes.