Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Magnesium oxide formula
Magnesium oxide formula
Explain gravimetric analysis
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Magnesium oxide formula
The purpose of this lab was to practice the skill of gravimetric analysis to determine the concentration of an analyte in a solution. The objective of this lab was to determine the amount of phosphorus in a sample of plant food compare that to the amount labeled on the container, which was 30%. In order to get the mass of phosphorus by itself, 2.5 grams of 10% liquid MgSO4 and 25 mL of ammonium was mixed with the liquefied form of the plant food in order to create a precipitant. This precipitate was the analyte that was needed to be extracted from the solution. After waiting 45 minutes for the phosphorus to settle to the bottom, the solution was filtered through a filtering paper and excess water was collected in the cup. When filtration was …show more content…
Compared that to the reported amount, there was only a 1.3% error, while the class had an average error of 6.35%. These results are quite impressive because the percent errors were quite low for a high school lab. Errors could have occurred during this lab that would have affected the accuracy of the gravimetric analysis. Some errors could include not waiting for a complete filtration of the solution which could have led to a decrease in phosphorous collected or a spill could have occurred. During the last filtration process, it was highly possible that a lost of product could have occurred if the precipitate was able to flow through the filtration paper. In order to prevent this in future investigations, a better filtration paper could be used or the excess water collected in the cup could be refiltered to collect any extra analyte that seeped through. Although the result collected from our group was very close to the reported amount, averaging the result helped other groups who had a high percent error, such as 12%, get a closer mass value and percentage of
Extraction is a separation method that is often used in the laboratory to separate one or more components from a mixture. Sucrose was separated at the beginning because it is the most immiscible and it’s strongly insoluble. Next Acetylsalicylic Acid was separated which left Acetanilide alone. Variety steps could have led to errors occurring. For example the step of separation, when dichloromethane layer was supposed to be drained out, it could be possible some aqueous layer was drained with it. Which could make the end result not as accurate. Also errors could have occurred if possibly some dichloromethane was not drained out. Both way could interfere with end result of figuring the amount of each component in the mixture. The solids percentage were 22.1% more than the original. That suggests that solids weren’t separated completely which clarifies the reason the melting points that were recorded were a slightly lower than the actual component’s melting point. The melting point for Acetylsalicylic Acid is 136 C but that range that was recorded during the experiment was around 105 C to 118 C. The melting points were slightly lower than the literature value. Sucrose was the purest among all component due to its higher melting point which follows the chemical rule that the higher the melting point the more pure the component
Once the mixture had been completely dissolved, the solution was transferred to a separatory funnel. The solution was then extracted twice using 5.0 mL of 1 M
The Gravimetric Stoichiometry lab was a two-week lab in which we tested one of the fundamental laws of chemistry; the Law of Conservation of Mass. The law states that in chemical reactions, when you start with a set amount of reactant, the product should theoretically have the same mass. This can be hard sometimes because in certain reactions, gases are released and it’s hard to measure the mass of a gas. Some common gases released in chemical reactions include hydrogen, carbon dioxide, oxygen and water vapor.
The experiment started by labeling a piece of filter paper with my initials with the following A, B, C, oil, and H2O. I placed two drops of each unknown milk sample, vegetable oil, and H2O next to the labels on my filter paper and allow to air-dry. After these samples were dried, I placed the filter paper in a petri dish containing Sudan IV solution and stained the filter paper for one minute. I then used the forceps to remove the filter paper to the rinsing dish. Then, I rinsed the filter paper with water and collect the runoff in the dish. The last step, I placed the filter paper on the table and allowed it to
In this experiment, there were several objectives. First, this lab was designed to determine the difference, if any, between the densities of Coke and Diet Coke. It was designed to evaluate the accuracy and precision of several lab equipment measurements. This lab was also designed to be an introduction to the LabQuest Data and the Logger Pro data analysis database. Random, systematic, and gross errors are errors made during experiments that can have significant effects to the results. Random errors do not really have a specific cause, but still causes a few of the measurements to either be a little high or a little low. Systematic errors occur when there are limitations or mistakes on lab equipment or lab procedures. These kinds of errors cause measurements to be either be always high or always low. The last kind of error is gross errors. Gross errors occur when machines or equipment fail completely. However, gross errors usually occur due to a personal mistake. For this experiment, the number of significant figures is very important and depends on the equipment being used. When using the volumetric pipette and burette, the measurements are rounded to the hundredth place while in a graduated cylinder, it is rounded to the tenth place.
Moisture is heavy, and thus it can change the results of the experiment, as we only want the weight of magnesium and the magnesium oxide.
Its value is usually around the 1.00. Thus, as urine becomes more concentrated, specific gravity will become higher. Specific gravity was expected to gradually decrease as urine becomes diluted and less water is reabsorbed. The value was not expected to change much, staying somewhere around the value of 1.00 for each subject. The results were in accordance with the hypothesis as all subjects specific gravity had slightly decreased over the 90-minute time period, staying within close proximity of 1.00. The subjects with the greatest change were the ones drinking 16 ml/Kg of water as urine seemed to be diluted most in this group. The graph shows that specific gravity of subjects drinking caffeine free soda had an initial increase then decreases at the end. Each group drinking varying amounts of water had the lowest average of specific gravity showing that dilution of urine can affect the value of specific
Change Apparatus Top Pan Balance - to weight carrots Measuring Cylinders - to measure solution and distilled water Dropper Pipettes - to ensure accurate measuring of solutions Distilled Water - to test how osmosis works in carrots 1M Salt Solution - to test how osmosis works in carrots Carrots Disks - to weigh carrot mass in Beakers - to soak carrots in Goggles - to protect eyes Diagram Method Using a measuring cylinder and dropper pipette I accurately measured 50cm³ of distilled water and 1M solution of sodium chloride then separately poured them into two separate beakers. The beakers were of
One possible source of experimental error could be not having a solid measurement of magnesium hydroxide nor citric acid. This is because we were told to measure out between 5.6g-5.8g for magnesium hydroxide and 14g-21g for citric acid. If accuracy measures how closely a measured value is to the accepted value and or true value, then accuracy may not have been an aspect that was achieved in this lab. Therefore, not having a solid precise measurement and accurate measurement was another source of experimental error.
The purpose of this experiment is to verify the accepted equation for the centripetal force of a mass during uniform circular motion. The hypothesis to be tested is that the calculated centripetal force for the stopper will be equal to the weight of the washers
The Effect of Salt Solution Concentration On The Mass Of Potatoes Introduction = == == == ==
Gravitational theory is a theory that states any two particles attract each other with a force that is equal to the product of the two masses. Before Newton, the views on gravity and the motion of the planets, were quite different. Aristotle believed the universe never had a beginning and would never end; he believed it was eternal. Kepler’s view on gravity and motion was that the planets orbited around the sun and orbits faster the closer it becomes to the sun. Galileo believed if something started at the same speed, the speed will stay constant. As Galileo, Aristotle, and Kepler were all great scientist, there was another scientist who was known to be the greatest in the world, his name was Sir Isaac Newton. Newton was known as a physicist,
A knot was tied about one inch from the end of the dialysis tubes. Then, three graduated cylinders were filled with twenty millimeters of either distilled water, 0.5 M sucrose, or 1.0 M sucrose. Using a funnel, each solute was poured into the corresponding dialysis tube. To keep the solute from leaking, another knot was tied about one inch of the opposite end. As the knot was tied, two fingers were used to remove air bubbles from the bag. Subsequently, each bag was rinsed with distilled water to assure that there was no sucrose residue, and then dried off with a paper towel. After waiting for a scale to display zero grams, each bag was then coiled on top of the scale to identify the mass in grams. The initial mass was recorded. Three containers were gathered and filled approximately two-thirds full with distilled water. Then, the three dialysis tubes were immersed into the corresponding container to soak in the distilled water for twenty minutes. To find the mass of the bags after being soaked in water, the bags were dried with a paper towel, and then coiled on top of the scale once again. The final mass was recorded. Finally, the mass difference and the percent change in mass was calculated and
Figure 4.1: Sieve Analysis • Fine To determine the grain size distribution of material passing the 75m sieve, the hydrometer method is commonly used. The soil is mixed with water and a dispersing agent, stirred vigorously, and then allowed to settle to the bottom of a measuring cylinder. As the soil particles settle out of suspension, the specific gravity of the mixture reduces. One hydrometer is used to record the variation of specific gravity over time, Figure 4.2. By making use of Stoke’s Law, which relates the terminal velocity of a free falling sphere to its diameter, the test data is reduced to provide particle diameters and the % by weight of the sample finer than a particular particle size.
There is also the potential of human error within this experiment for example finding the meniscus is important to get an accurate amount using the graduated pipettes and burettes. There is a possibility that at one point in the experiment a chemical was measured inaccurately affecting the results. To resolve this, the experiment should have been repeated three times.