Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
What are the characteristics of good governance
Challenges of good governance
Significance of good governance
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: What are the characteristics of good governance
Introduction
The connotation “Good governance” has been used within the international community and it has acquired the characteristics of a “container concept”, incorporating too much principles. Good governance is an indefinable term used in international development literature in describing how the public institutions should conduct public affairs and manage public resources that are at its disposal. The running of administration according to the defined laws intended to achieve the objective of promoting the welfare of the citizens at large in a democratic oriented order is known as Good Governance. The exercising of authority in accordance with the established laws is Good Governance and it guarantees safety as well
…show more content…
It is through clarity that transparency, participatory and efficient governance is promoted. It is through conviction that accountable and effective governance is promoted. It is through compassion that consensus oriented, equitable and inclusive governance is promoted. It is through consistency that the responsive governance which follows the rule of the law and modernizes itself according to the needs and changes of the society upholding the guiding principles of the Constitution is promoted. In order to achieve good governance, the Government should act as a facilitator for the people, market and civil society and remain a prudent regulator to ensure social equity and fair competition in the society. Every change in the role of the Government should be carefully defined and communicated to the citizens at large so that the citizens will understand that changes are in their …show more content…
Using e-Tools for Good Governance & Administrative Reforms by Dr. P.K. Mohanty, IAS, Director General, Centre for Good Governance, Hyderabad.
2. Good Governance Plus in pursuit of Gross National Happiness, Lyonpo Sangay Ngedup, Prime Minister of Bhutan.
3. Administrative Reforms for Better Governance by N.C. Saxena, 2012 l xviii+99pp. l 978-93-81144-26-8 (Pb)
4. Good Governance and Public Administration Reform in the Black Sea Economic Cooperation (BSEC) Member States, Xenophon Papers No. 6, www.icbss.org.
5. Good Governance, Administrative Reform and Socio-economic Realities: Bangladesh a case study by Mirana Mahrukh, Senior Assistant Secretary, Economic Relations Division, Ministry of Finance, Peoples Republic of Bangladesh.
6. Note on Good Governance by Dr. Anishia Jayadev, Lecturer, IMG.
7. Good Governance and Administrative Discretion by Constantine Stephanou, Jean Monnet Professor of European Institutions, Department of International & European Studies, Panteion University, Athens.
8. Good Governance and Administrative Reforms, Presentation to PGD Graduates, 2013, RIM, 26th July, 2013.
9. Principles for good governance in the 21st century- Policy Brief No.15- August 2003 By John Draham et
Vachudova, Milada Anna. ‘Corruption and Compliance in the EU’s post-Communist Members and Candidates’, Journal of Common Market Studies,47, 2009, 43-62
The citizens should have the power to rebel and change the government, if they see a defect in the system. People shape the government, so the people should be able to make changes or completely revolutionize their government. For example, In source E Vowell states that, “A true American Patriot is by definition skeptical of the government” (Source E). A person that cares about their nation would be willing to question their government and not always agree with the system. The government should not be so powerful that no one can disagree with its policies. If it becomes too powerful,
In order for the government to serve it’s people it needs to understand and reflect its
Public Administration involves the development, implementation and management of policies for the attainment of set goals and objectives that will be to the benefit of the general public. Since Public Administration involves taking decisions that affect the use of public resources there is often the question of how to utilize public resources for maximum public good. The National Association of Public Administration has identified four pillars of public administration: economy, efficiency, effectiveness and social equity. These pillars are equally important in the practice of public administration and to its success. This paper seeks to explain the role of each of the pillars in the practice of public administration.
Frank J. Goodnow’s “Politics and Administration,” infers that politics and administration cannot be divided and are in need of each other to function. However, politics are superior to administration. Goodnow’s further analyzes and identifies three forms of authorities that enforce and implements states will. The first responsibility of authority is to respect the right of the people when conflicts ascend between either private or public matters. The second is judicial authorities also referred to as executive authorities that ensure the needs and policies of the state are executed. The third authority also referred to as “administrative authorities,” focuses on the mechanical, scientific and business authorities pertaining to the government.
On a large scale, governance describes methods a governing body uses to ensure its citizens follow established protocol. At the macro level, there is a loosely coupled organizations structure that supervises and maintains respons...
The study of public administration only continued to grow over the course of the next two decades. As the study of public administration expanded, so did the development of s...
In the future I would like to see myself, as a continuously promoted public official who could possibly become a pro-active politician in today’s demanding political arena. To achieve this, I would like to gain more knowledge which can help me reach intellectual maturity to the latest practices adopted in the field of Public Administration. My desire for self-development in this area and curiosity to learn past and contemporary developments in different societies will help me to solve the problems easily.
NAZ, M. E. (2003). ORIGIN, IDEAS AND PRACTICE OF NEW PUBLIC MANAGEMENT:LESSONS FOR DEVELOPING COUNTRIES. Asian Affairs , 33.
According to Sapru R.K. (2008) p370-371 the traditional ideal of public administration which inclined to be firm and bureaucratic was based on processes instead of outcomes and on setting procedures to follow instead of focusing on results. This paradigm can be regarded as an administration under formal control of the political control, constructed on a firmly ranked model of bureaucracy, run by permanent and neutral public servants, driven only by public concern. In emerging nations the administration was true bureaucracy meaning government by officers. In this perspective Smith (1996) p235-6 perceived that“the bureaucracy controls and manages the means of production through the government. It increases chances for bureaucratic careers by the creation of public figures,demanding public managers, marketing boards.
Microsoft (2005) Finance Agenda - The business value of good corporate governance, viewed 22nd June 2010 http://download.microsoft.com/download/3/5/e/35e89ed5-267c-4642-ad8b-46ecaf7b45d3/Business%20Article%20-%20The%20Business%20Value%20of%20Good%20Corporate%20Governance.doc
Because it could be quite complicated to look at the EU model from a point of classical democratic nation-state, it seems to be reasonable to discuss this problem, not by abstract reasoning, but by focusing on a concrete case. European Union is the best case available, which in recent decades has developed into a new type of political system with enormous consequences on democracy and governance in its member states. Despite repeated attempts for major institutional reforms, this system is likely to persist in its basic structures for the future and is unlikely to develop into a federal state or to disintegrate into a classic international organization. The present state of democracy and governance in the EU is therefore worth to be analyzed, as it is not a mere transitory state.
Since the 1980s vast change initiatives has been undertaken in the public sector of the developed countries. The inflexible, hierarchical and bureaucratic form of Public management which was common during the twentieth century is shifting to more flexible, market-oriented form of public management. This dramatic shift alters the role of government and the relationship between government and citizens. Traditional public administration has been questioned in practice, and the acceptance of new public management means the rise of a new model in public sector management (Hughes, 1998).
Despite criticism about its ineffectiveness, bureaucracy is necessary in the society to enforce order and organization in the delivery of services and interactions between the state and citizens, especially considering the national scale of government and its service for a multitude of citizens. The reforms aimed at rectifying the political circumstances that had facilitated the prevalence of financial crises, corruption, and various inefficiencies in the delivery of public services. Introduction of a market-oriented model of public administration focusing on efficiency, public expenditure control (mainly through shrinking the government), and treatment of citizens as clients in the delivery of public service suited the evolving circumstances. Rather than an end in itself, the regime of bureaucratic reforms was a means to ascertain desired quality and standards in public service delivery. It represented a phase in the continuous objective of public administration to achieve and maintain high quality in public service
Today in the present world, most countries have the core object of governance in the “public good provisioning ” leitmotif. According to the main principles ; accountability, participation and transparency, from the governance ecology interaction between the State, Civil Society and Market –place, within the global-village environment, (Higgot and Ougaard 2002; Stiglitz 2003; Woods 2006) “Governance Deteriorate the Economical Progress of the Developing Countries”(Box 15.4 Kaufmann, Kray, and Mastruzzi, 2008 p 291 Governance Matter Vll: some leading findings). In my opinion governance on itself without parametric recognition is doomed to fail, instead of reflecting to new mechanisms of responsibility to steer and guide the social and economical issues, which I will try to clarify in the upcoming body breakdown. Governance is supported as structure through institutions, as process through instruments and as agenda through elements of good governance, generating the capacity to improve significant development and positive impact of economic growth and to cut back destitution. Despite of the fact that developing countries can come in line with the quality of governance by accepting it as a crucial determinant of developmental performance, it didn’t came into effect. The underlying fact of weak and poor governance was identified as a result, for not effectuating the measureme...