Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
The role of mediation in conflict resolution
The role of mediation in conflict resolution
Importance of mediation in conflicts resolution
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: The role of mediation in conflict resolution
Good employment mediation benefits everyone in a company. Even situations where it seems impossible to resolve a dispute can be helped by mediation, and can produce a good outcome for both employers and employees.
In a serious employment dispute (such as dismissal, personal grievances or harassment), it's sometimes tempting to try to find an outcome without involving a third party mediator. Unfortunately, because no one in these situations is unbiased, it doesn't always benefit either party in the long run.
Disagreements in business are sometimes as complicated as in a relationship. There can be a myriad of factors which make both sides feel they are in the right. This is where employment mediation can help; since mediators are independent and because they cannot be connected to either party, they can make an unbiased
…show more content…
If the dispute is successfully mediated, it can lead to a mutually satisfying outcome, even when things are not how the parties expected.
When a compromise cannot be reached through employment mediation, a mediator can continue to work to find solutions that will benefit both parties, or offer a recommendation based on their unbiased understanding of the situation. They can even offer a binding solution that both parties agree to keep before the mediator decides the outcome.
Successful employment mediation also hinges on both parties being able to accept the outcome and honouring the agreement reached. In terms of employment, this may mean an employee accepting that they were fairly warned for behaviour that was inappropriate or that jeopardised themselves or others, and it may mean an employer accepting that an employee was warned or reprimanded without a strong enough reason to do so. As long as the outcome upholds the law, the mediator can then help both parties keep the decision by making them sign an
Sue contracts with Tom to deliver a quantity of computers to Sue’s Computer Store. They disagree over the amount, the delivery date, the price, and the quality. Sue files a suit against Tom in a state court. Their state requires that their dispute be submitted to mediation or nonbinding arbitration. If the dispute is not resolved, or if either party disagrees with the decision of the mediator or arbitrator, will a court hear the case? Explain. (See Alternative Dispute Resolution.)
Mediation is typically used in disputes involving employers and workers where it would be important to maintain the working relationship (Kubasek, p. 72). Mediation, in this scenario would not be beneficial because Margolin may ask for substantial compensation and Funny face could refusing to pay. Also may want to seek criminal charges on Funny Face.
The purpose of this paper is to analyze a specific, hypothetical employment situation encountered and to include the information regarding employment conflicts, questions, grievances, lawsuits, etc., in terms of how the situation was handled or resolved. Employment conflicts are a constant issue everyday in any organization; it is how you handle them both legally and professionally that counts.
Mediation is typically ordered in types of cases that there is significant emotional ties; creating a potential for hostility, loss of relationships or personal feelings getting in the way of reaching an agreement. Arbitration is the best option for cases where the parties simply cannot come to an agreement and decide to have someone else decide the outcome of the case for them, without the expense and formality of a trial. Arbitration is also useful in highly complex cases where it is necessary to have a highly trained professional come to the
Ott, Marvin C. "Mediation as a Method of Conflict Resolution: Two Cases." International Organization 26.04 (1972): 595-618. JSTOR. Web. 3 Dec. 2013.
Poitras, J. (2007). The Paradox of Accepting One's Share of Responsibility in Mediation. Negotiation Journal, 23(3), 267-282. Retrieved January 23, 2012, from ABI/INFORM Global. (Document ID: 1313496891).
If you are like the majority of managers operating within labor contracts then you can relate to the frustration that accompanies the labor grievance process. For the most part, grievance policies are set to be mediating faucets that allow for a clarification or even a compromise between employer and employees. Yet, what takes place absent a clear understanding of the true purpose of the grievance process may be a whirlwind that brings about much aggravation and frustration between both parties. What follows are three effective methods in ensuring that your company’s approach in dealing with grievances is not distorted or manipulated.
... with the aggrieved worker and representative meeting with the supervisor involved, followed by an appeal system with strict time limits and ultimately ending in binding arbitration. When management and the union cannot resolve a grievance submitted by a union, the union must decide whether to proceed to the final step of the grievance procedure: arbitration. Arbitration is an adversary proceeding like a trial in court. An arbitrator’s function is usually to interpret the collective bargaining agreement between the parties, not to apply his or her standards of what is right in a given situation. The courts have sought to compel labour and management to a peaceful resolution of grievances through arbitration. The Supreme Court has given support to the arbitration process in a series of decisions, and judicial deferral to arbitration has become a basic tenet of national labour policy.
Look up the word conflict in the dictionary and you will see several negative responses. Descriptions such as: to come into collision or disagreement; be at variance or in opposition; clash; to contend; do battle; controversy; quarrel; antagonism or opposition between interests or principles Random House (1975). With the negative reputation associated with this word, no wonder people tend to shy away when they start to enter into the area of conflict. D. Jordan (1996) suggests that there are two types of conflict: good, which is defined as cognitive conflict (C-type conflict) and, detrimental, defined as affective conflict (A-type conflict). The C-type conflict allows for creativity, to pull together a group of people with different opinions or ideas, to combine and brain storm all thoughts to develop the best solution for the problem. The A-type conflict is the negative form when you have animosity, hostility, un-resolveable differences, and egos to deal with. The list citing negative conflicts could go on forever. We will be investigating these types of conflicts, what managers can do to recognize conflict early, and what strategies they can use to resolve conflicts once they have advanced.
The term collective bargaining is quite common within organizational circles. The term captures the reality of the issues that exist in the relationship between employers and workers. Indeed, employers need employees to provide the necessary labor to achieve organizational goals. Irrespective of whether the employer is the government or from the private sector, collective bargaining is an important element for ensuring a better working relationship with employees. To understand this, it is prudent to provide a definition of collective bargaining because it captures its essence. Collective bargaining entails a negotiation process between employers and workers regarding better employment terms and working conditions. Often, employers and employees
Although functions of mediators and arbitrators have several characteristics in common, there are significant instrumental differences that make them distinct from one another. Firstly, whereas the arbitration process is similar to litigation in its adversarial nature, in which parties have the objective to win the dispute, the fundamental goal of mediation is to bring the disputants to settlement through compromise and cooperation without finding a guilty party. In arbitration, parties compete against each other in “win-lose” situation. During mediation, parties work on mutually acceptable conditions with the assistance of a facilitator. In this process, mediators do not have power to make decisions, they work to reconcile the competing needs and interests of involved parties. The mediator’s tasks are to assist disputants to identify, understand, and articulate their needs and interests to each other (Christopher W. Moore,
Unnecessary conflict may be prevented through employee involvement and treating employees in a fair manner. Ethical employment practices, involving employees in decisions, and treating employees as valued organizational members all work towards a positive employer-employee relationship. Unfortunately, however, it sometimes becomes necessary for an outside party to help employers and employees resolve differences through processes such as mediation or arbitration. Taken together, positive engagement strategies and constructive resolution of differences help to develop relationships which support organizational performance and success.
However, must be bear in mind that the mediator is at no power of making decisions which bind the parties. The mutual agreement or resolution which achieved during a mediation process will need enforcement by registering the resolution or settlement agreement in court. Although mediation seems like a better solution than the court process however, must be remember that not every mediation session will end up with a settlement or resolution as wanted, take for example a mediation which took place between one of Malaysia celebrity, Hanez Suraya and her Public Relation (PR) Officer, Mohd Fairus...
Arbitration is a form of Alternative dispute resolution in which parties present evidence to an arbitrator or panel and have their case heard. Some arbitration is mandatory and others are voluntary, arbitration may also be binding or nonbinding depending on the way the contract is designed. In employment contracts some employers have begun implementing a mandatory arbitration clause upon hiring of employees. Some feel that the mandatory arbitration clause in employment is unfair to the employees, as this takes away their right to litigate a matter. In Employment Arbitration clauses “any controversy or claim arising out of or relating to this employment application; employment ADR program; employment contract, shall be settled by arbitration
I think mediation went alrigh for Connor and I. I think are biggest problem in not only mediation but overall has been communication. I think a lot of tension that came between us was mostly from misconceptions about one another. In fact, the reason things were ended between us was over a lie someone had told me about Connor. Then our only interactions became when we were drunk, or avoiding each others path in the dining hall. Sometimes when we drink too much we do silly things, stupid things, and even mean things.