Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Development of military leadership
Leadership in the army today
Development of military leadership
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Development of military leadership
Fifteen months of tense relations between President Abraham Lincoln and General George McClellan resulted in the dismissal of the Union Army’s once promising leader of the Eastern theater. While McClellan believed that he did not have the support of the President, and therefore resisted orders, what were the underlying factors that led to this decision? Why did the general all but ensure the end of his military careen with months of ignoring orders and bantered correspondence with his Commander-in-Chief? This research discusses the army that McClellan built in the early stages of the war, but failed to use as the President commanded, as well as, provides insight into the final reasons for his removal. In the early years of the Civil War, …show more content…
General George Brinton McClellan was thought to be the best choice for leadership of the Union Army. With his experience in the Mexican-American War, West Point stature, and authorship of several military manuals, McClellan had a great resume for Civil War leadership and was often referred to as the Young Napoleon. In May of 1861, he was commissioned as major-general of the regular army, outranking everyone except Lt. Gen. Winfield Scott who was the General-in-Chief of the Union Army. McClellan quickly began work on building the Union Army and was charged with preventing Kentucky from seceding. McClellan’s set up training camps to organize thousands of volunteers. He also presented a dual plan of military tactics that would invade through Virginia’s Kanawha Valley toward Richmond, then turn south into Kentucky and Tennessee. This plan however was rejected by Lt. Gen. Scott who said citing that the use of three-month’s men would be more useful in blockading the Atlantic and Gulf ports, which would later be named the Anaconda Plan. This rejection would strain the relationship between Scott and McClellan over the next year and could have been seen as a predictor of insubordination in his relationship with Lincoln. In one letter to Ohio Governor William Dennison, he told the governor of his disapproval, but not to use his name as it might disturb the general. In Virginia, McClellan won small skirmishes at the Battle of Philippi, and the Battle of Rich Mountain. Rich Mountain however was only won despite his cautious reluctance to commit forces which proved to be his hallmark in battle. In July 1861 Lincoln called McClellan to the Eastern theater. After the loss at Bull Run Lincoln had begun his search for a successful general to command the Army of the Potomac, who’s focus was to protect Washington. This increased his sense of pride over his success in the West and gave way to public cries of his military superiority. McClellan was the man of the hour, the chosen one to end the Civil War and in a letter to his wife he expressed his delight with his new position to the point of he could become a dictator or anything that he pleased. McClellan refusal of Scott’s Anaconda Plan displayed his preference for an overwhelming overland battle style that can be compared to that of Napoleon. His desire to expand the Army of the Potomac to over 250,000 men and 600 guns was driven by the idea that he could crush the rebels in one campaign, imposing the least amount of impact to citizens as possible. At this same time, he developed a thought process that would ultimately lead to his dismissal. He was convinced that the Confederates were lying in wait to attack the Army of the Potomac with a mighty force that would easily overpower the North if they did not re-enforce the army with more men. After the Union loss at Ball’s Bluff it was apparent that some of the Union commanders needed more training and convinced the President he needed to be more involved. Thus, they created the Joint Committee on the Conduct of the War, urging Lincoln to push his generals to advance on the Confederate Army. By the end of 1861 the dispute between McClellan and Scott became personal. In a letter to his wife McClellan expressed that “Gen. Scott will not comprehend the danger, and is either a traitor, or an incompetent. I have to fight my way against him” Scott became disheartened and offered his resignation to Lincoln and on November 1 the President named McClellan as General-in-Chief of the Union Army. The conflict between McClellan and Scott had no effect on the views of the soldiers. The Army of the Potomac had high morale and was supportive of their leader, even referring to him at the savior of Washington. This however was not the case with his and Lincoln’s relationship, and he further damaged through insulting insubordination. In January 1862, Lincoln called a meeting with his top generals.
McClellan snubbed the President and did not attend the meeting. Lincoln summoned McClellan to the White House, where the cabinet demanded his war report. Here he divulged his plan to protect Washington and take Richmond, called the Urbana Plan. Later that month Lincoln sent orders to the Army of the Potomac to begin an overland attack at Manassas Junction and Centreville. To this order McClellan replied with a 22-page objection citing that his Urbana Plan would be more effective. Reluctantly Lincoln agreed to allow this plan to proceed, expressing his approval at the fact that the General-in-Chief was actually going to move …show more content…
troops. In early March Lincoln could see that McClellan was not moving.
Once again, he doubted the Generals resolve by calling a council of war to assess the generals plan. The Urbana Plan was nullified however when Confederate General Joseph E. Johnston withdrew from his position south of Washington and moved south of the Rappahannock. With this move McClellan revised his strategy and had his troops come ashore at Fort Monroe in order to advance up the Virginia Peninsula enroute to Richmond, this became known as the Peninsula Campaign. The savior general once again came under severe criticism when Congress learned that General Johnston had used Quaker guns to ward off attacks by the Army of the Potomac. These painted trees to replicate cannons kept the Union Army at bay for longer than the President liked. Added to this a Confederate ironclad, the CSS Virginia, emerged and caused a panic in Washington. As a response to this Congress’s introduced a resolution to dismiss McClellan from his position as General-in-Chief of the Union Army, and was barely
defeated. On March 11, 1862, Lincoln made the decision to remove McClellan as General-in-Chief, demoting him to only command the Army of the Potomac. Although many leaders in the government continued to resent the commander he was still loved by his men. A surprise attack by Confederate forces at the Battle of Seven Pines stopped the Union troops. McClellan delayed any further movement, while asking for more reinforcements from Washington. This stalemate at Seven Pines had another damaging effect on the military campaign. During the battle, General Johnston was injured and Robert E. Lee was appointed to take up the command. Lee took advantage of the overly cautious Northern general and hammered the Army of the Potomac in series of unrelenting attacks. During the bloody Seven Day’s Battle, McClellan was forced to retreat back to Washington. This resulted in Lincoln naming Henry Halleck General-in-Chief and stripping McClellan of his command over the Army of the Potomac. General John Pope, now in command, failed to capture Richmond at the Battle of Second Manassas and Lincoln once again appointed McClellan to lead the army. With Little Mac once again at the head the Army of the Potomac moved to stop Lee’s invasion of Maryland
Sears’ thesis is the Union could have won the war faster. McClellan was an incompetent commander and to take the initiative to attack an defeat the Confederate army. The Army of Northern Virginia, under...
Stewart R. W. (2005). American Military History (Vol. 1). The United States Army and the
...didn’t over step his authority or attempt to subvert the army for his own purposes. Instead, George Washington sets the example of the military commander who was subservient to civilian political leadership. He also showed patience and coolness in the face of adversity. On many occasions in the book, the author cites Washington’s expressions of doubt and fears of failure, yet Washington never showed fear or doubt in action in front of his troops.
McDowell’s opponent at Manassas was General Beauregard, commanding the 22,000 troops facing McDowell, while at the same time General Joseph Johnston commanded the Army of the Shenandoah with some 10,000 troops. When Beauregard determined that the Union forces were on the way toward Manassas, he asked for help, at which time the Confederate Government sent Johnston east via the “Manassas Gap Railroad,” to act as reinforcements for Beauregard. Their arrival at Manassas at a critical time turned the tide in favor of the South,...
At the beginning of the Philadelphia Campaign, General Washington was not sure of General Howe’s plan. That changed when General Howe ...
Jefferson Davis, president of the Confederate States of America, showed weaknesses within his leadership which may have contributed to the confederacy’s loss and the unions win . Davis failed in three vital ways. These ways were: his relations with other confederate authorities and with the people, as well as in his fundamental concept of his job as president and in his organization and specific handling of his role as commander in chief . Davis failed in maintaining communication with leaders and with his people, often unable to admit when he is wrong which led to lack organization in his role . In addition, Davis was a conservative leader, not a revolutionary one which meant that his strength was often in protocol and convention rather than in innovation . Studying each of these aspects that represented a weakness in Jefferson Davis’s leadership, Lincoln in comparison provided more admirable and outstanding qualities within his leadership which in many ways affected the outcome of the war
On March 5, 1861 Abraham Lincoln got a message for Maj. Robert Anderson, who was at Fort Sumter, saying that there was less than a six week supply of food left. On April 8, Lincoln told Gov. Francis Pickens of South Carolina that he was going to try to refurnish the fort. The Confederate government ordered Gen. Beauregard to demand the evacuation of the fort. If it was refused he was to force its evacuation. (www.us-civilwar.com/sumter.htm) Anderson received a letter from Gen. Beauregard telling him to evacuate the fort or h...
The Union Army was able to match the intensity of the Confederacy, with the similar practice of dedication until death and patriotism, but for different reasons. The Union soldiers’s lifestyles and families did not surround the war to the extent of the Confederates; yet, their heritage and prosperity relied heavily on it. Union soldiers had to save what their ancestors fought for, democracy. “Our (Union soldiers) Fathers made this country, we, their children are to save it” (McPherson, 29). These soldiers understood that a depleted group of countries rather than one unified one could not flourish; “it is essential that but one Government shall exercise authority from the Gulf of Mexico to Canada, and from the Atlantic to the Pacific” (Ledger, 1861).
General Lee said, to be a good soldier you must love the army, to be a good general you must be prepared to order the death of the thing you love, and therein lies the great trap of soldiering. When you attack you must hold nothing back." Thomas J. Jackson was both a good soldier and a good general. In the Mexican War he fought with all his heart for his country. When the Civil War came, he was a general. He never hesitated to send his men forward. He held nothing back. George McClellan also fought with all his heart for his country in the Mexican War. When the time came to send his men forward in the Civil War, he couldn’t do it. He loved the army to much to order its death.
After the second Battle of Manassas, the Army of the Potomac was demoralized and President Lincoln needed someone that could reorganize it. President Lincoln liked General McClellan personally and admired his strengths as an administrator, organizer, and drillmaster. Lincoln was aware that the soldiers loved General McClellan and had nicknamed him “Little Mac.” Knowing this, President Lincoln ordered General McClellan to “assume command of Washington, its defenses and all forces in the immediate vicinity.”1 This was not a field command but intended for General McClellan to take the returning demoralized Army and the new soldiers coming into Washington and make them a fighting force, nothing more. Lincoln knew as well that although Ge...
His idea was known as the ten percent plan in which ten percent of a states qualified voter would take a loyalty oath to be readmitted into the Union. This would allow the south to get back into the main stream and find some solutions to its many problems. Unfortunately for Lincoln and unfortunately for America, Lincoln would be assainated only one month after the south surrendered. This presented America with one more hurdle to overcome, and that hurdle was to initially be jumped by the newly appointed President Johnson.
After the Confederate victory at Chancellorsville in May of 1863, General Robert E. Lee and his Army of Northern Virginia embarked on their 2nd invasion of the north. General Lee’s first campaign into the north resulted in the Confederate defeat at Antietam. The failure of Lee’s first northern campaign raises the question of his motives. The Confederate Army was...
Lincoln found powers in the constitutional clause making him "Commander in Chief of the Army and Navy of the United States, and of the militia of the several states." He said that because of this clause, he had the right to use any means necessary to defeat the enemy. With this justification, he issued many executive orders before Congress even convened. Lincoln summoned the militia, ordered a blockade of the Confederacy ports, expanded the regular army beyond its legal limit, and directed government funds before congressional allocation. of these powers were granted to him in the Constitution.
The Battle of Antietam could have been a devastating and fatal blow to the Confederate Army if Gen. McClellan acted decisively, took calculated risks, and veered away from his cautious approach to war. There are many instances leading up to the battle and during the battle in which he lacks the necessary offensive initiative to effectively cripple and ultimately win the war. This paper is intended to articulate the failure of Mission Command by GEN McClellan by pointing out how he failed to understand, visualize, describe and direct the battlefield to his benefit.
“[Lee’s orders were that] the cavalry should remain on the Army of Northern Virginia’s right flank during the campaign, screening the infantry and scouting for the approach of Gen. George G. Meade’s Army of the Potomac. Rather than remain within the rather broad confines of Lee’s orders, Stuart grossly abused the discretion Lee had given him by going off on a grandiose raid to the outskirts of Washington, D. C. (Woodworth, 578)”.