Gendered Paradoxes Summary

495 Words1 Page

Base on the introduction up to chapter two of “Gendered Paradoxes,” I think Adely analyzes gender in Jordan from a cultural relativist rather than an ethnocentric standpoint. Adely is born in the United States and she is a Jordanian American. Adely’s writing is already leading me towards the side that she is not ethnocentric, I am not sure if she can be ethnocentric because she is a Jordanian American. I don’t believe an anthropologist can be ethnocentric when doing his/her research because cultures are all different. Adely digs deep and explains why the Jordanians’ gender issues can be paradoxical from her research “strategically situated ethnography”.
Adely suggests that family’s reputation and geography can affects young women’s path in the modern Jordan. She points out the best private schools provided better education but majority of the poor couldn’t afford such luxury. Education is a big part of the development in Jordan since the very foundation of the nation but being educated will not automatically means successful as she writes, “with unemployment for Jordanians under the age of twenty-five over 60 percent in 2003, the return on education are not guaranteed.” However, families continue to hope education …show more content…

In Hiba’s story we can see Adely finds out more about the view on education from Jordanian parents, “despite being obviously wealthy, Hiba’s mother was embarrassed that neither she nor her husband had completed their education”. It is clear that the Jordanians focus a lot of emphasis into education but we also know from earlier that education won’t get what you want in Jordan. However, like Adely says, the situation of women in Jordan today cannot be understood outside the historical events and political and economic context she outlined. The culture and gender issues of Jordan have to comprehend from someone who understands Jordan’s roots from beginning to

Open Document