Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Gender and culture may influence the way language is used
Gender and culture may influence the way language is used
Differences of gender in language
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Gender and Formal Language Language is a multifaceted topic. It seems that language cannot be discussed without also discussing the differences that occur within speech. One of the most obvious differences exists between the speech of men and women. This paper describes the existence of “women’s language” and “men’s language.”(O’Barr and Atkins 1980) More specifically, this paper will discuss how these so-called languages differ in the way they address power in a formal situation. These gendered differences in speech occur in the way topics are brought up, what words are chosen, how hedges are used, and how intonation is utilized. (Holmes 1986;O’Barr and Atkins 1980) I will address how male language tends to be more assertive and confident in situations that affect power, while female language tends to be more apologetic and tentative when asserting information. (Kiesling 1997;O’Barr and Atkins 1980) I hypothesize that these differences do not reflect natural inclination or ability of the two genders. These differences in male and female language occur because they have been socialized in America by the construct of gender roles and respective expectations of genders. (O’Barr and Atkins 1980) I will analyze this hypothesis with sources of third parties and with my research. Literature Review: What is “Women’s Language”? There have been several discussions that address the differences between male and female language use. These discussions all began with Lakoff’s controversial essays from 1975 that first introduced the concept of “women’s language.” (O’Barr et al 1980) Since Lakoff’s essays, other linguists have sought to address the issue of how gender affects language. O’Barr and Atkins use Lakoff’s information ab...
... middle of paper ...
...rom Fiction." Making Sense of Language: Readings in Culture and Communication. Comp. Susan D. Blum. New York, NY [etc.: Oxford UP, 2013. 443-58.
Holmes, Janet. "Functions of You Know in Women's and Men's Speech." Language in Society 15.01 (1986): n. pag. JSTOR. 10 Oct. 2013. .
Kiesling, Scott Fabius. "Power and the Language of Men." Making Sense of Language: Readings in Culture and Communication. Comp. Susan D. Blum. New York, NY [etc.: Oxford UP, 2013. 408-17.
Mill, John Stuart. Philosophy of Woman: An Anthology of Classic to Current Concepts. Ed. Mary Briody Mahowald. Indianapolis [etc.: Hackett, 1994. 151-70.
O'Barr, William M., and Bowman K. Atkins. ""Women's Language" or "Powerless Language"?" Making Sense of Language: Readings in Culture and Communication. Comp. Susan D. Blum. New York, NY [etc.: Oxford UP, 2013. 401-06.
Deborah Tannen’s, “Fighting For Our Lives,” explores the ideas and concepts behind human sociology. She delves into the sociolinguistic relationship between women and men in conversation. Tannen amplifies the importance between language and gender and how they affect interpersonal relationships. Tannen showcases her analytical thinking processes by using rhetorical strategies to support her claim on conflicted communication within the argument culture. Specifically, focusing on politics, the law, education, spousal relationships, the media and within work environments. She gives many examples to support her claim by using figurative language and literary devices such as metaphors and logic and reasoning to accurately convey her message.
She discusses sexist language; her focus is on words that people consider okay such as male-generics:
You Just Don’t Understand: Women and. Men in a Conversation. New York: HarperCollins, 1990. 203-5. The syllable of the syllable.
Deborah Tannen is the author of “How Male and Female Students Use Language Differently.” This article was published in the “Chronicle of Higher Education.” Tannen is the author of several books explaining how individuals engage in conversation. Her argument is that in a classroom setting, males engage in more conversation than females. She challenges different teaching styles, and she determines that an individual’s conversation style is relative to the situation they are in. She uses examples from a book by Walter Ong and from several sociologists and anthropologists. Tannen uses formal language throughout her article.
Deborah Tannen, a linguistics and renowned professor discusses in, “How Men and Female Students Communicate”, the many unique ways that men and female students in her classes talk. In addition, Tannens primary focus is discussing why her female students are less vocal than her male students.
In drawing an overall conclusion we have found that language itself is not sexist, but has been used by a male dominated society to oppress and denigrate females. Slowly but surely through a wave of feminist movements, this fact is being recognized. Steps are being taken to try and correct this and to give females a chance at being equal and not second class citizens. The more I became engrossed in this assignment the more I realized (being female) that we are being belittled by men’s use of language. It is true that many women apologize for their existence when conversing in general but more especially when interacting with men. This appears to be due to a general feeling of inferiority or lack of confidence. When society itself institutionalizes such attitudes, the language reflects the bias. When everyone in society is truly created equal and treated as such there will be little concern for the asymmetries that exist in the language.
Communication is an essential part of human life. People perceive things in a different way because of ethnic background differences, attitudes and beliefs, etc. These differences may affect our ability to communicate with our counterpart. Therefore, it is necessary to keep our mind open so that we can reduce the risk of communication breakdown. Men and women are different as everyone knows that. However, their differences are no just physiological and anatomical. Recent researches have concluded that there are remarkable differences between the two genders in the way their brains process information, language, emotion, cognition etc. Scientists have discovered the differences in the way men and women carry out mental functions like judging speed, estimating time, spatial visualization and positioning, mental calculation. Men and women are strikingly different not only in these tasks but also in the way their brains process language. This could account for the reason why there are overwhelmingly more male mathematicians, pilots, mechanical engineers, race car drivers and space scientists than females. On the other hand, there are areas in which women outperform men. Women are naturally endowed with better communication and verbal abilities. They are also effective than men in some of the tasks like emotional empathy, establishing human relations, carrying out pre-planned tasks and creative expressions (Kimura 1999).
Tannen, Deborah. "How Male and Female Students Use Language Differently." The Prentice Hall Guide for College Writers. Eight Edition. Ed. Stephen Reid. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson, 2008. 361 - 367.
Bilger, Audrey. "On Language: You Guys." Isaacs, Giura, Keohane, Kitchen, Lubrano, and Maloy. Made With Words. 2nd Edition. Bedford/St.Martin's, n.d.
In linguistic studies throughout the 1900’s, most linguists and scholars focused their research on members of society that were middle-class, heterosexual, white males, and it wasn’t until the mid-70’s when Robin Lakoff released Language and Woman’s Place that linguistic research regarding the connections between language and gender was conducted. Lakoff’s work resonated with feminists of the time and therefore illustrated the ways that language can be used to create and reinforce sexist behaviors in society. However, much has changed since 1973 when Lakoff’s work was first released. Postmodern feminist theories involving gender roles, gender identity, sexuality, and expansion of opportunities for women and minority genders1 are all continually
Wardhaugh, R. (1986). An introduction to sociolinguistics. New York, NY, USA: Blackwell. Retrieved April 27, 2014.
This section describes differences between speech of men and women. Those differences are discussed point by point as the followings:
The English Language has been spreading over the centuries, imposing itself to the lives of the generation. As years pass by there is an addition of people learning/knowing how to speak English. As women’s role in society gain more power and status, there seems to be a shift from Standard English to Feminist English. Equality is a golden standard to all humans; it does not seem to be the case in the equality of genders in the English language. Thus, creating a negative attitude concerning Feministic influence in the language. This paper examines the language change in modern English, by describing how the Feminist language has effected and developed the English language, through Social, Political, and Educational implications of the change.
Prosenjak, Nancy, Mary Harmon, Sue Johnson, Pat Bloodgood, and Lisa Hazlett. " Guidelines for Gender-Fair Use of Language." National Council of Teachers of English. NCTE, n.d. Web. 24 Mar 2014.
The book An Intorduction of Sociolinguistics is an outstanding introductary book in the field of sociolinguistics. It encompasses a wide range of language issues. In chapter 13, Wardhaugh provides a good insight to the relationship between language and gender. He explains gender differences of language-in-use with concise examples. Wardhaugh riases questions about sexist language and guides readers to look closer at how people use language differently because of their own gender in daily life. According to the Whorfian hypothesis, which indicates that the way people use language reflects their thoughts, different genders adapt different communication strategies.