Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Gender and language psychological perspective
Gender and language psychological perspective
Gender differences in communication
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Gender and language psychological perspective
Deborah Tannen, a linguistics and renowned professor discusses in, “How Men and Female Students Communicate”, the many unique ways that men and female students in her classes talk. In addition, Tannens primary focus is discussing why her female students are less vocal than her male students.
Tannen argues that women do better in groups of the same gender. Furthermore, Tannen claims that later on in life, females do better if they went to a school that is female only. Her reasoning behind this is because she believes that men in particular have an advantage of speaking in classes. (Tannen 369-370)
In the classes that Tannen taught, she noticed that men openly discuss and debate discussion questions, contrary, the females in her class are
relatively reticent. Tannens reasoning is that the females in her class are often not willing to discuss something they feel will make them look incompetent. But the reason the men in her class are willing to openly speak the questions is that society has given them an impression that they should take the lead in answering. (Tannen 369-370) To solve the problem of female students not speaking in her graduate class, she put her class in groups. The groups that Tannen put her students in was different from typical groups in that she put everyone in groups based on race, gender, and if the person was introverted or extroverted. To her astonishment, she realized that the females in her class who rarely spoke, were actually talking more. (Tannen 372-373) Tannen has worked on solving the problem of females being disadvantaged for years. Furthermore, she continues to work on making new ways to solve gender equality problem. In conclusion, Tannen advocates that to make classes equal-opportunity universities need to comprise of small groups, and place students in these groups accordingly. (Tannen 373)
In the story, “But What Do You Mean” by Deborah Tannen she talks about men and women having different ways of seeing things. Some of the things she talks about I believe in while the other things I believe that these things aren’t true. In the text it talks about many different things. It says women apologize to much while men don’t, women cannot take criticism as well as men, women say thank you to much where men don’t say thank-you enough, women and men don’t fight the same, women and men have different habits in regard to giving praise, women and men don’t compliment the same, and finally men can take jokes better than women.
Today, women and men are more socially equal then 1993 when Tannen had written this short essay. Through these twenty years women have accomplished many things in different areas that set them equal to the supposedly inferior, men. In my opinion there is no unmarked human being. You are marked by just saying you are male or that you are female. Men are marked just like women are just a little more discreet. I feel that men are noticeably marked in areas where they are the minority. In Tannen’s short essay she says “Some years ago I was at a small working conference of four women and eight men.” We can infer out of the group that the men were the majority and the women were the minority. Also that there was some bias in the information she shared. This is why I assumed Tannen moved towards the women in her observation because they were the minority. When people are the minorities they tend to be looked at differently and marked as so. For instance nursing and secretary jobs are held by more women than men. When you see a male nurse or a male secretary, he is marked. He is the one out of all the female nurses who is marked because he is the minority. It is vice versa for women as well. For example in politics and construction where men are dominating those work areas. You see a female governor or construction worker, you know that she is marked because she is the minority in this
Women respond very well to tone and word choice, which Tannen uses to her advantage. She uses personal experience to relate with her more female audience. For example, in the criticism section she uses a scenario that occurred between a male and female editors. Tannen “appreciated her tentativeness” that she gave Tannen when wanting to cut out part of her story(301). In contrast to that her male editor gave her a much different response, saying “call me when you have something new to say”(301). By stating a scenario with two very different outcomes, she falls more bias to women. This is effective to her more female audience because it paints women in a positive light and paints the men in a very negative light. The obvious bias towards women can arguably hurt her more than it could help her. Tannen automatically outs her male audience at a very awkward side, and makes it impossible for them to feel sympathy towards her. This hurts Tannen’s opportunity for having a broad audience, but for what she wrote it for she is very effective. If we are simply talking about how effective it was for women then Tannen hit home with them. Tannen’s choice of using what men say is also very smart, and helps with her effectiveness. She heard a man say, that after working for two women he realized neither of them have a sense of humor(304). By using examples like these
In the introduction of Deborah Tannen’s “Conversation Style: Talking on the Job”, she compares and contrasts the ways men and women communicate. This reminds me of what I tell people that are struggling in their relationships. Women and men express themselves differently. Women think, but men act. If you can’t wrap your head around this, being in a relationship with anyone is going to be hard. Yet, this is such a basic way of looking at this issue. Not only are the genders vastly different, but each person relates to the world around them in a certain way. He or she also needs to be related to in a specific way. Looking at personalities and personal histories can give a better look at the way we communicate with each other. Tannen examines
Sommers begins her view on girls scouring higher than boys by expressing that girl students are moving ahead of boys. She appeals to the mournful emotions of the audience that she and many researchers get to the bottom of what the scores are between the two genders. She joins in this time of expressing in order to explain “scholars should be more concerned about the boys who never show up for the tests they need if they
Do men and women effectively communicate in the same way, or is it just a conversation of misunderstanding? There is constantly a new interest in whether men and women converse successfully. Professor and journalist, Deborah Tannen writes, “Sex, Lies, and Conversation: Why Is It So Hard for Men and Women to Talk to Each Other?” Tannen compares and contrasts all conversational styles, and explains how the expectation of dialogue affects how men and women converse. Tannen focuses on the subject of marriage and the imbalance of interest between male and female couples. The contrasting perspective however comes from, Deborah Cameron, author of, “What Language Barrier”. Cameron conveys that the stereotypes left upon male and female communication
It says, “would result in warm and continued relationship with men, a sense of maternity, interest in caring for children, and the capacity to work productively and continuously in female occupations.” (429, Devor) I believe that gender shapes how we behave and relate to one another. Devor explains that by using an educational approach, describing gender stereotypes, and making cultural references. These rhetorical devices serve his larger goal of getting readers to reflect on how their childhoods formed their genders.
“Men come from Mars, Women came from Venus”. Is this quote true? Males and Females have a lot in common, but they are definitely not identical. They are different in many ways, one of them being the language used in face-to-face interaction. Men and Women have very different traits, which separate them from one another such as how assertive they are in conversations, their choice of vocabulary when speaking, and also how talkative they are. In this essay, I will seek to examine and explain the reasons behind these differences and critically analyse how they relate to my society.
Lieberman, Simma. “Differences in Male and Female Communication Styles” Simma Lieberman Associates (undated). Retrieved February 25, 2010<
In “His Talk, Her Talk," Joyce Maynard writes about the different characteristics of men’s talk, and women’ talk. She based her research on her experience that happened between her and her family. Joyce Maynard brings out the theory of man and aggression, woman and submission, man and intellect, woman and instinct. Even though, there i...
Certain types of behaviors are categorized as masculine or feminine.” She is stating the fact that in different country they are still treated the same. She also says, that in school they are treat in treated way cause how they want them to be and act on how they should be acting and this is also stated my fact that they are still stereotyping gender
Tannen, D., 1990. You Just Don't Understand: Women and Men in Conversation. New York: William Morrow.
It gave the readers plenty of opportunities to think of different angles. I began considering not only how I thought I talked, but analyzing how other women talked. After reading, "Women Talk Too Much", it made me analyze my own experiences along with the shocking realization that teachers do not know how biased they are being, as described by the Australian researcher, and pondered strategies on how teachers may use to combat
While females are more likely to, “adopt a strategy of “silent protest” after they have been interrupted” (170). According to Maltz and Borker, men’s dominance in conversation goes along with their dominance in society. In society men, typically, are seen as the more dominant gender over women (170). This also applies to inside the classroom as more men tend to speak out and do more of the talking than women. Most of the time teachers view interaction and participation as a very important part of their student’s ability to succeed. According to Deborah Tannen, author of “How Male and Female Students Use Language Differently” in many classrooms, for learning tools teachers use the debate like format when discussing topics. Tannen writes that teachers would have the students read an article and break it down, and discuss it as a group. Although the debate format does work for men, it does not appeal in some cases to females. In her work, Tannen points out that, English
The book An Intorduction of Sociolinguistics is an outstanding introductary book in the field of sociolinguistics. It encompasses a wide range of language issues. In chapter 13, Wardhaugh provides a good insight to the relationship between language and gender. He explains gender differences of language-in-use with concise examples. Wardhaugh riases questions about sexist language and guides readers to look closer at how people use language differently because of their own gender in daily life. According to the Whorfian hypothesis, which indicates that the way people use language reflects their thoughts, different genders adapt different communication strategies.