The War Against Boys Analysis

Gender Matters
Novelist, Christina Hoff Sommers, in her narrative essay, “The War Against Boys”, the essay explains of how boys are a year and a half behind girls in education. Sommers purpose is to convey the idea that girls are not treated as boys are when it comes to the classroom. She creates a dramatic tone in order to convey to her readers that boys and girls have a different mindset. She also arguers about how some of the blame is towards Carol Gilligan as well as organizations such as the National Organization for Women for creating a situation in which Obstacles on the path to gender justice for girls and boys are resented, both as the unfairly privileged sex.
Sommers begins her view on girls scouring higher than boys by expressing that girl students are moving ahead of boys. She appeals to the mournful emotions of the audience that she and many researchers get to the bottom of what the scores are between the two genders. She joins in this time of expressing in order to explain “scholars should be more concerned about the boys who never show up for the tests they need if they

are to move on to higher education”. The outpouring of feelings from Sommers conveys an assuring tone of how we should understand the difference in boys and girls learning style.
Sommers shifts to her myth of unraveling by acknowledging that there are two types of students.

She compares to the mournful emotions of the audience of describing the difference of students that are “highly successful” and the “disillusioned” students. The highly successful students are the students that work hard and have good grades. The disillusioned students are the opposite that have little contact with teachers and do not care for what grade they are given. The issue of emotion that comes from these two is there is always going to be students that do not try hard enough to succeed in having a better education for themselves. More of the higher percentage are girls that are successful and boys are not so successful. She explains that because of this higher percentage, that the highly successful students will get more attention from teachers, parents, and

administrators.
Sommers ends that widening the gender gap in academic achievement is real by describing millions of American boy’s future are threaten. She appeals that boys are not getting all the help they need, so the emotion is towards boys being on the weak side of an education gender gap. She believes that we should repudiate the partisanship that currently clouds the issue surrounding sex differences in the schools. She promotes a call in balance for fair treatment and concerted national effort to get boys back on track. Sommers supports that we no longer allow girls to shape the discussion and write the rules.
Sommers conclusion states that boys are behind girls in education and learning. Sommers purpose is to explain her purpose of why boys are so behind in learning from girls. She adopts a serious tone of understanding how we can encourage boys to do just as well or e more improved in school than girls. Sommers notifies that boys are most likely not attending college rather than girls will take the feeling of going farther and working harder. She states that we are turning against boys and forgetting a simple trust in a signify tone that the competitiveness and energy are of decent males that help make what is right in the world.