Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Medicine in ancient Athens
Contributions of ancient romans to the study of medicine
Contributions of ancient romans to the study of medicine
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Medicine in ancient Athens
Galen
Galen was one of the greatest doctors of the ancient world.
Galen performed dissections on monkeys, pigs, and other animals, and
established comparative anatomy as a field of anatomy.
Galen was born in Pergamum (Present day Turkey), a city of the Roman
Empire. He began to study medicine at the age of 14. He firstly began
at Rome but later went to the great city of Alexandria. At about A.D.
157, Galen became a physician for trained fighters called gladiators.
This was an indirect early breakthrough for him, for this experience
gave him valuable information about surgery and diet. In 161 or 162
AD, Galen went to Rome. There, he presented lectures on anatomy and
physiology and soon was hired to be the physician of the household of
the Roman emperor, Marcus Aurelius. This position enabled him to
write, research, and travel. By 200 AD, he had written many works on
medicine and physiology.
As time passed, some of Galen's main theories were proved false. For
example, Galen thought that the liver changed digested food into
blood, which then flowed to the rest of the body and was absorbed. In
1628, however, the English physician William Harvey showed that blood
circulates throughout the body and returns back to the heart.
Though Galen was proved wrong. He was the only doctor in ancient times
to come up with a theory so close to the correct one. And his theories
were very advanced for his age.
Galen discovered that the brain, not the heart, was the control centre
of the body. He also figured out that the arteries were filled with
blood not pneuma, which was what people believed it was filled with.
The three main Followings of Galen
1) Clinical Observation: -
The through observation of a patient's symptoms and behaviour. The
Doctor would later, note this down in a diary and would keep it in a
shelf. This information would then be referred to, if any other cases
with the same symptoms appeared.
Galen Followed Clinical observation very strongly.
So from that facts and his theory to solve the planet problem, he explained the retrograde motion. (Retrograde motion is actually an optical illusion because it appears to go backward as Earth passes).
1. - Mental Health: Devon informed the writer that she lost her prescription. The writer called the medical centre and requested a copy of them. Devon could pick it up at any time.
... a theory should be able to explain a wide variety of things, not just only what it was intended to explain.
Jamison describes another medical figure in her life that she referred to as Dr. M. Dr. M was Jamison’s primary cardiologist, a figure who is involved in some of the most intimate details of Jamison’s life. However, Jamison describes Dr. M by saying she, “…wasn’t personal at all” (14). Dr. M would actually record personal information about Jamison on a tape recorder, however, Jamison would hear Dr. M referring to her as “patient” instead of by her name. This example demonstrates that Dr. M was indeed putting in the minimal effort needed to keep her clients, however, no additional effort was put into the process of learning about her patients. Jamison says that, “…the methods of her mechanics [were] palpable between us…” (18). Dr. M would not even put any effort into disguising her lack of interest of getting to know Jamison. This atmosphere of apathy that is exuded by Dr. M naturally causes Jamison to retract from Dr. M, which creates an environment that is not good for cultivating
assume the doctor wasn’t able to diagnose Alan for over a year, because he still went through the
Popper asserts that "it is easy to obtain confirmations, or verifications, for nearly every theory--if we look for confirmations." Kuhn illustrates (page 6), in his discussion of cosmologies, that man needs a structure for his universe. Man needs to explain the physical relation between his personal habitat and nature in order to feel at home. Explaining this relation gives meaning to his actions.
...health of a patient and a follow up check at the GP’s may be required.
process of explaining the entities of human life no matter if anyone believes him or not.
Observe, record, and report to physician patient's condition, treatment provided, and reactions to drugs and treatment
...d scientists should study cognitions because he was against the idea of cognition but he viewed them as a valid subject for research.
When one theory is found to be false, another theory is quickly postulated to cover the first error.
In the beginning of the book he decribes that his intention of writing the book are not that of to prove factual accounts, for there are many of those already, but to explain their experiences in present day knowledge. He goes on to say ,”No explanations are needed for those who have been inside, and others will understand neither how we felt then of how we feel now.
As the story begins, the unnamed doctor is introduced as one who appears to be strictly professional. “Aas often, in such cases, they weren’t telling me more than they had to, it was up to me to tell them; that’s why they were spending three dollars on me.” (par. 3) The doctor leaves the first impression that he is one that keeps his attention about the job and nothing out of the ordinary besides stating his impressions on the mother, father and the patient, Mathilda. Though he does manage to note that Mathilda has a fever. The doctor takes what he considers a “trial shot” and “point of departure” by inquiring what he suspects is a sore throat (par. 6). This point in the story, nothing remains out of the ordinary or questionable about the doctor’s methods, until the story further develops.
that it was made up of small Gods. Although his theories didn’t prove to be right, such as
“Imagination is more important than knowledge. For knowledge is limited to all we know and understand, while imagination embraces the entire world, and all there ever will be to know and understand” (Albert Einstein). Albert Einstein’s claim could be broken down into two segments; one is defining the term knowledge as being “limited to all we know” and the second defines imagination as “embracing the entire world.” His words are not meant to attack any other scientist out there, all he meant was that imagination initiates our curiosity which leads us to conduct studies that eventually reveal information that we know as knowledge. Come to think of it, all great breakthroughs in history came from these ‘Eureka’ moments instead of solely reason of logic.