Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Analyzing organizational culture
Analyzing organizational culture
Theory of social capital
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Analyzing organizational culture
The Company Man narrated a story during the economic recession, when GTX, a multi-billion-dollar publicly held shipbuilding company had to deal with the challenges of laying off more than three thousand employees. The story revolved around three employees on different strata of the company ladder and presented how GTX’s downsizing devastated their private lives.
This essay aims to provide a deeper reflection on GTX corporation, and it will be accomplished by examining the following questions:
1) organizational culture and the underlying values GTX corporation presented
2) an evaluation of downsizing from both stakeholder approach and ethical standpoint
3) impact of social capital mainly how the company’s decisions affect their social capital
…show more content…
Instead, he would rather exchange his stock for putting people back to work. Although the decision was unalterable, McClary as one of the few corporate men who still has a heart was trying his best to save as many employees as possible, even at the expense of the company’s bottom line. This brings us to further reflect the company’s downsizing from an ethical point of view. Is it ethical to announce a massive layoff just for building a new corporate building? Even employees who had most seniorities and had been worked in GTX for decades did not escape the result of being fired. To those employees, what struggled them most was their re-employment. Their perspectives to get a new job were very bad even though they were highly qualified. Phil Woodward could be regarded as their representative. He started from the bottom and worked all his way to the top. After being laid off, contracts became damp squids, his age and salary worked against him. As the backbone of his family, bills, daily expenses and daughter’s impending college tuition fees were all waiting for him to repaid. Finally, being frustrated and depressed, he committed suicide in his garage. Therefore, is it ethical to fire senior employees who had dedicated their lives to the …show more content…
Phil Woodward, who worked his way up to the corporate ladder was fired. Finally, because of the misalignment on whether to spend money building new corporate headquarters while laying off employees, even McClary, the oldest friends and co-founder of GTX was fired by Salinger. And these were just three of thousands of people who were eliminated during the company’s downsizing. GTX’s vicious downsizing was doomed to severely impact their reputation. Organization’s attractiveness to future employees would be affected because even if the economy recovers, the ex-employees would not want to go back as they had very little emotional bond with the firm, and it might be even harder for the company to recruit any new talents, if their company’s philosophy of treating employees as working machines were spread out. Besides, consumers, nowadays are more and more concerned with social sustainability, and business people are more inclined to make deals with companies that are socially responsible and ethical. GTX might go through a hard time if they want to expand their business or find business partners in the
Under his leadership, companies like Scott Paper and Sunbeam-Oster benefited from massive layoffs designed to give the illusion of profitability. This is in stark contrast to what great leaders do during the inevitable downturn. According to Collins, great leaders are looking for way to find and keep great talent, especially during dips in earnings or productivity. The idea of employee-churn to great organizations is paramount to a failure in leadership. When hiring, great leaders “take the time to make rigorous A+ selections right up front” (GTG, p.75) Good to Great leaders take their time with important hiring decisions. It is more important to have the right people on the bus and in the right seats then to have a bus filled with people who do not belong. Letting people who do not belong on the bus comes down to two simple questions: 1. “If it were a hiring decision (rather than a “should this person be off the bus?” decision) would you hire the person again? 2. If the person came to you to tell you he or she is leaving to pursue an exciting new opportunity, would you feel terribly disappointed or secretly relieved?” (GTG,
Many organizations have been destroyed or heavily damaged financially and took a hit in terms of reputation, for example, Enron. The word Ethics is derived from a Greek word called Ethos, meaning “The character or values particular to a specific person, people, culture or movement” (The American Heritage Dictionary, 2007, p. 295). Ethics has always played and will continue to play a huge role within the corporate world. Ethics is one of the important topics that are debated at lengths without reaching a conclusion, since there isn’t a right or wrong answer. It’s basically depends on how each individual perceives a particular situation. Over the past few years we have seen very poor unethical business practices by companies like Enron, which has affected many stakeholders. Poor unethical practices affect the society in many ways; employees lose their job, investors lose their money, and the country’s economy gets affected. This leads to people start losing confidence in the economy and the organizations that are being run by the so-called “educated” top executives that had one goal in their minds, personal gain. When Enron entered the scene in the mid-1980s, it was little more than a stodgy energy distribution system. Ten years later, it was a multi-billion dollar corporation, considered the poster child of the “new economy” for its willingness to use technology and the Internet in managing energy. Fifteen years later, the company is filing for bankruptcy on the heels of a massive financial collapse, likely the largest in corporate America’s history. As this paper is being written, the scope of Enron collapse is still being researched, poked and prodded. It will take years to determine what, exactly; the impact of the demise of this energy giant will be both on the industry and the
The case deals with the initial phase of this change process where the strategy was to divest noncore activities to generate the immediate requirement of cash to reduce the debts and to restructure and downsize the company to reduce the losses. In a resulting situation of high demoralization of employers, Mark Parton had to push forward the cultural changes introduced by Lord Simpson with suitable modifications needed to match the vastly changed challenges now facing the company.... ... middle of paper ... ... • Be highly capable and respected for their contribution • Say with clarity and honesty what they think and feel • Challenge the status quo, to improve business performance.
Ethics policies are implemented in almost all businesses. Companies search for candidates that will be moral in their actions so they can ensure long-term financial success. Throughout history we have seen businesses fall due to unethical behavior. In recent years the business Enron Corporation is best known for the scandal that led to the bankruptcy of a company with more than 60 billion dollars in assets. We will examine the circumstances that led to the downfall of Enron, how the scandal was realized, as well as the outcome of one of the largest bankruptcies in American history; a case that exemplifies unethical professional behavior.
The movie “Glengarry Glen Ross” presented a series of ethical dilemmas that surround a group of salesmen working for a real estate company. The value of business ethics was clearly undermined and ignored in the movie as the salesmen find alternatives to keep their jobs. The movie is very effective in illustrating how unethical business practices can easily exist in the business world. Most of the time, unethical business practices remain strong in the business world because of the culture that exists within companies. In this film, the sudden demands from management forced employees to become irrational and commit unethical business practices. In fear of losing their jobs, employees were pressured to increase sales despite possible ethical ramifications. From the film, it is right to conclude that a business transaction should only be executed after all legal and ethical ramifications have been considered; and also if it will be determined legal and ethical to society.
Lastly, by holding unlawful job negotiations with a Pentagon official, the Boeing former financial officer was seen to be breaching the utilitarianism principle. Moreover, concealing of the findings of the internal studies regarding gender’s pay further illustrates this ethical lapse in Boeing.
In business, the mantra that success comes to those who can recover from setbacks is widespread all over the world. One of the organizations that poignantly illustrate this element is Costco. Costco is a warehouse firm that was founded in 1976 in San Diego. Although many people may envy the company as its owners enjoy huge success in the warehouse and retail industry, what the majority of individuals do not know is that in the first year of operations, Costco lost $750, 000, but after 3 years, the company had $1miilion in profit, 900 employees, and 200000 members. This shows that in business, the strategy can be the difference between success and failure. This essay describes how Costco has undergone evolutionary changes from its inception
The board 's actions did not bring the most pleasure to the greatest number of people, and at no time did the company think of any other parties and the consequences of their actions. Tyco’s actions help to endorse the views of economist Milton Friedman, who is an advocate of the narrow view. The narrow view states that corporations only think of profit and care less for the stakeholders within the corporation. Possibly it is a mistake to see a corporation as being morally responsible or to expect it to display such moral characteristics as honesty, considerateness, and sympathy (Shaw, 2014, p. 155). The victims in this case were clearly the employees, shareholders, stakeholders, and the company
Although the actors are convincing and the film well-crafted, “The Company Men" delivers few satisfactory character portraits because the movie isn't really about characters, it's about economic units. When a corporation fires you, it doesn't much care whether you're a good friend, a loving father, or a liar. You are an investment it carries on its books, or not. The movie's impact comes when these people realize it doesn't matter in economic terms who they are.
In addition, the company doesn’t work in ethical manner, and those in authoritative positions never share the decisions with employees because the company tends to operate more by using monologic communication where bosses always speak, while employees always have to listen. For example the consultants find out that an employee called Milton was laid off five years ago but there was no one to tell him. The Bobs try to fix the payroll problem in order to make sure that Milton doesn’t get paid but still they don’t tell him that he is fired, and let him to his job because he no longer receives his paychecks. Moreover, one of the consultants says that “they always try to avoid confrontation if possible”. The way how they fire employees is completely unethical. The consultants usually laugh and make jokes about employees that they let them go which clearly illustrates the lack of care that they have for them. Due to this
In the early 2000s, the United States government was faced with a dilemma, should General Motors (GM), the second largest, US based, global-automotive company, that employed millions, be bailed out? The dismantling of the organization would have a great impact on the economy. Some of the events that led to this bail out were the results of ethical egoism from the corporation. The Democratic Congress - GM Bailout, was an act of utilitarianism—a lot was at stake and could have had a negative long-term impact on the economy.
This paper will analyze Enron’s Code of Ethics and examine the sections on values and corporate responsibility. The paper will use applicable theories and concepts and will detail Ken Lay’s view of ethics and Enron’s corporate social performance. The paper will argue that Enron was not being socially responsible to all of its stakeholders because it deceived employees and investors about its real financial status despite having stated in its company code of ethics that transparency, integrity, and respect for the law would be the cornerstones of its daily operations.
Trimming fat and reducing management layers is inevitable. However, boosting shareholder wealth by stepping on the stakeholders is immoral and unethical. While it is hard to say definitively what the right answer here was, we can examine some of Kidder’s principles of resolving ethical dilemmas to evaluate the decisions made. For example, ends-based thinking, which refers to doing what is best for the masses, was clearly not accounted for in this decision making process. Shareholders and senior management seemed to be the benefactors in CSC’s example. Furthermore, the care-based thinking principle also seems to have been neglected in this decision making process. I would find it difficult to imagine that senior leaders contemplated their proposed behaviors as if they were the object rather than the agent, and consulted their feelings before determining that 40% of the workforce must fall into the category of not meeting expectations (Hughes et al., 2014). Overall, CSC’s decisions were clearly not entirely moral or
In the aftermath of Enron, Washington Mutual Bank, TYCO, and World Comm these companies went against the grain of what good ethical behavior is and what their respective company’s code of ethics were. The criminal justice system has made it clear that it will not allow companies and their executives to get away with the misuse of public trust by allowing them to make themselves rich at the expense of the employee. Where these crimes are both ethically and morally wrong, the CEO’s of major corporations are being punished by a ...
Layoffs are one means by which an organization can reduce expenses with the intent of improving its bottom line. Despite being typically performed as a last resort, layoffs often have a negative impact on the remaining workforce. As a manager, there are numerous areas for concern in managing the workforce going forward. The human costs related to downsizing are “immense and far-reaching” with one of the most profound being survivor syndrome according to Hanson (2015, p. 187). Also known as survivor’s guilt, this condition relates to the emotions felt by those still employed and some of the effects include decreased motivation, moral, and job satisfaction, as well as an increased proclivity to search for other employment. This volunteer turnover being another grave concern for managers, and retention of the remaining workforce is usually dependent on their existing perception of the organization and its culture (Sitlington & Marshall, 2011). Also relayed by