Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Theory of social capital
Theory of social capital
Theory of social capital
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Theory of social capital
Emergence of the concept of ‘social capital’ into development literature dates back to the period of post-World War II. Since then it has received considerable attention among sociologists, economists and political scientists and has reputed for its capacity in delivering benefits such as welfare of the society, better care of children, improved government responses, better health care and lowering social injustice. Furthermore, it is considered as an emerging area of inquiry with agencies such as World Bank and the OECD. The thrust of this paper however, is to emphasise the necessity to build social capital in developing world to empower the communities to have sufficient resources to hold their governments accountable and to facilitate their entry into market economies. To begin, I will be defining some of the basic terms used in the argument to provide theoretical grounding extracting most notable authors in this approach and then discuss the role of social capital in holding governments accountable followed by its role in market economy. Definition of terms The concept of social capital is multi-dimensional in nature and related to the social relationships in general. Therefore the structure of the relationship and quality of are important in dealing with social capital. The different magnitudes of it as studied by scholars in this sphere are discussed below to draw the definition for social capital. Social Capital as Coleman (1989) defined by its function, “is not a single entity but a variety of different entities, with two elements in common: they all consist of some aspect of social structures, and they facilitate certain actions of actors-whether persons or corporate actors-within the structure”. Definition by Fukuyama (... ... middle of paper ... ...ina, New York, NY, Cambridge University Press. UPHOFF, N. & WIJAYARATNA, C. M. 2000. Demonstrated Benefits from Social Capital: The Productivity of Farmer Organizations in Gal Oya, Sri Lanka. World Development, 28, 1875. WILSON, P. A. 1997. Building Social Capital: A Learning Agenda for the Twenty-first Century. Urban Studies (Routledge), 34, 745-760. WOOLCOCK, M. 1998. Social capital and economic development: Toward a theoretical synthesis and policy framework. Theory and society, 27, 151-208. YOKOYAMA, S. & SAKURAI, T. Potential of social capital for community development. Report of the APO survey and symposium on redesigning integrated community development 2003-2005. Potential of social capital for community development. Report of the APO survey and symposium on redesigning integrated community development 2003-2005, 2006. Asian Productivity Organization (APO).
Wainryb, C., Smetana, J.G., & Turiel. E. (2008). Social development, social inequalities, and social justice. New York, NY: CRC Press.
The Forms of Capital (1986) written by Bourdieu address the concepts of cultural and social capital. From his point of view, he believes that cultural capital is something that is equipped by oneself and, as a result, reproduces economic capital. The two capitals are directly proportion to each
Putnam, Robert D. 1993b. The Prosperous Community: Social Capital and Public Life. American Prospect 13: 35-42.
To fully understand why social, economic, and cultural capital could lead to success or failure, it is essential to know the difference between the three. Social capital is defined by the Organization for Economic Co-Operation and Development as “the links, shared values, and understandings in society that enable individuals and groups to trust each other and to work together” (OECD, 2015). Social capital can be multiple things including family members, colleagues, and strangers who have the
Zukin, Sharon. "Gentrification: Culture and Capital in the Urban Core." Annual Review of Sociology 13(1987): 129-147.
In Unequal Childhood - Class, Race, and Family Life, Annette Lareau tributes the French social scientist Pierre Bourdieu when using his theory of the forms of capital as a fundamental argument on her study. In this theory, Bourdieu recognizes three different types of capital; social, symbolical and cultural. Bourdieu describes social capital as “the aggregate of the actual or potential resources which are linked to possession of a durable network of more or less institutionalized relationships of mutual acquaintance and recognition.” This means that social capital is based on resources built from personal relationships, club memberships and other social influence and connections. The second form of capital,
Cultural capital has great power through the control and maintenance of traditions, expected and accepted roles and behaviours, notably gender roles, important artefacts, language, institutions and services (Navarro, 2006). Of these, two essential contributors being educational facilities and religious institutions (Navarro, 2006). Finally, economic capital holds power through property and literal financial capital or monetary resources, this empowers individuals to have some degree of agency and autonomy (Navarro, 2006). This gives power to individuals to interact with higher classes, or form part of such, to purchase and interact with goods and services that are valued by the society and in turn receive respect and enhances social status (Navarro, 2006).
...ely and directly convertible into money and may be institutionalized in the form of property rights. When I stated I went to high school the students and I also had a similarity which was being “well endowed” as cultural capital, Cultural Capital is fluid and can be supported by economic capital to expand one cultural community for example the more money I have the more likely my community that I involve myself with will be just as financially endowed and may be institutionalized in the form of educational qualifications; and as social capital going into a company or organization I stated that I got in contact with one of the alumni at my local high school who so happens to working for the company or as an executive officer in that organization I get hired and the cycle starts again making me the central figure for economic capital, given me a title and prestige.
In academic discourse concept reemerged in the 1980s in France and then spread in most European countries, Latin and North America, and Asia. In the beginning of 21st century the social economy is considered as a possibility for a “third way” of development after the collapse of state-controlled economies and the criticism of liberal economies.
McMichael, Philip, ed 2012. Development and Social Change: A Global Perspective, 5th ed. London: Sage Publications, Inc.
Why nations Fail: The Origins of Power, Prosperity, and Poverty, is a captivating read for all college economic courses. Coauthored by Daron Acemoglu and James A. Robinson, they optimistically attempt to answer the tough question of why some nations are rich and others are poor through political economic theories. They lay it all out in the preface and first chapter. According to Acemoglu and Robinson, the everyday United States citizen obtains more wealth than the every day Mexican, sub-Saharan African, Ethiopian, Mali, Sierra Leonne and Peruvian citizen as well as some Asian countries. The authors strategically arranged each chapter in a way that the reader, whomever he or she is, could easily grasp the following concept. Extractive nations that have political leadership and financial inconsistencies within their institutions are the largest contributor to poverty and despair within most countries. It also states that countries with socioeconomic institutions that work ‘for the people and by the people’, or in other words, focus on the internal agenda of that
Pierre B (1961) Culture Capital Cited, Taylor P ; Richardson Jr John; Yeo, A, (1995), The class structure and educational attainment, Sociology in Focus, pp.297, Ormskirk, Causeway Press.
‘Social Planning’, is a model of development which can be described as, ‘Doing For’, the community. If it is perceived by government bodies that a community has sunk so low that is unable to be resolved by using alternative methods, (some of which will be discussed later in this essay), the government will intervene with methods deemed necessary.
Susan S. Fainstein, Scott Campbell. 2003. Readings in Urban Theory. Second Edition. Oxford, UK: Blackwell.
The Role of Community in Society Communities are an essential part of our society, because we all depend and interact with each other. Communities are groups of people that help an individual to learn and develop new ideas. A society is where people’s relations with each other are direct and personal and where a complex web of ties link people in mutual bonds of emotion and obligation. The idea of community has provided a model to contrast to the emergence of more modern less personal societies where cultural, economic and technological transformations have uprooted tradition and where complexity has created a less personal and more rationalized and goal directed social life.