Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Leadership what it means to me
Leadership approaches and theories
Leadership what it means to me
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Leadership what it means to me
Many models are used to assist in understanding various leadership concepts. The one discussed in this essay is designed to illustrate the process of moving from a vision to a strategic execution. This class has given us the aptly named, “From Vision to Execution,” model. This model takes the shape of an inverted pyramid with six stages; Vision, Team Building, Environmental Scanning, Strategic Intent, Calibration, and Execution. This model, and the paragraphs below, are intended to show the necessary steps to take a broadly defined vision, evaluate and assemble the appropriate resources, review and design a plan of attack, and ultimately bring the vision to life. Encompassing each step is the overarching issue of constraints. Constraints can, and will, manifest themselves each step of the way. As seen in our slides, constraints can be regulation and laws, shareholders, the Board of Directors, social pressures and sanctions, legitimacy, or possibly even the vision itself. It is critical that leaders know where they want to go, and have a roadmap for getting there. This model is that roadmap. While it is not all-inclusive of the many talents leaders must possess, it does reflect many of the talents the great ones had. To further illustrate the model I will incorporate many examples of distinguished leaders from videos and class (Jobs, Kelleher, Welch), rely on several articles (Isaacson, PWC, Schwarber, Quiznos), and reiterate some information from our slides.
The uppermost block of the pyramid is vision. Vision, as intended for this model, refers to the broad direction someone wants to take a company. Vision does not tell us exactly where we want to go, nor does it tell us how to get there. In its simplest form, it merely tells us...
... middle of paper ...
...eve Jobs was focused on every detail, for every product. Nothing about the product was overlooked. Every user interface, the feel of the item, the packaging; everything was carefully scrutinized to ensure it fulfilled its intent and contributed to the overall vision. While many examples exist, as a final example, I would like to offer the case discussed in Schwarber 2005. In this case, the sales director proposed her strategic intent to her team. She had planned a holiday product offering, every detail of it. She planed the products, packaging, coupons, and even the distribution and redemption of the coupons. When she presented idea, it failed. The reason it failed is because she did not follow the steps as outlined in the first three blocks. She had the vision, conducted some environmental scanning, developed a strategy, but failed to consult the team effectively.
Both, vision and mission statements provide purpose to organizations. Therefore, they should set the foundation for the strategic planning process. However, if and organizations strategic direction evolves, leaders should consider revising the organization’s mission and vision
As stated by Simpson (1994), the intent of a company’s vision should be to move forward and create enthusiasm amongst employees. Masco Cabinetry’s vision faltered in the early days of the recession. The vision created by its previous president was “One brand in one out of every two homes” (Employee Handbook, 2012). This vision, at the height of the recession was meant to create energy and drive, the opposite happened as many employees felt the goal was too lofty given the state of the economy. Today’s executive team is hard at ...
Jay, J. (2012). Strategic Leadership Review, Volume 2, Issue 1. In Scholasticahq. Retrieved Janurary 26, 2013, from https://scholasticahq.com/supporting_files/397/attachment_versions/394.
Across the globe, there are CEO’s, managers, and several other individual’s in leadership-type roles that have the expectation of making their company successful in the eyes of the investors, the employees, and the customers that they serve. This may be measured by a company’s gross profitability, employee engagement or overall customer satisfaction. Most companies have leadership models and strategies in place that leaders are expected to use in order to drive the expectations of the company while maintaining consistency across the business. In an effort to examine various types of leadership styles, I have conducted interviews with two individuals that are or have been previously tasked with leading their teams and their company towards success.
Andy Stanley begins with the origin of a vision. Stanley (1999) contends, “Visions are born in the soul of a man or woman who is consumed with the tension between what is and what could be” (p. 17). According to Stanley, a vision is the ability to see what is possible in light of the present reality. A leader will not a have a vision for an organization if he is content with the status quo. Conversely, it is out of discontent that a vision is birth within a leader’s heart.
It focuses on how to formulate and define clearly vision statement (organizational culture), challenging goals (organizational strategy) and gaining respect and trust (Humphreys & Einstein, 2003). The leaders encouraging participations, willing to take risks and acting as role models, who are highly admired, respected and trusted by their followers (Conger and Kanungo, 1998; Howell and Frost, 1989 and Bass & Riggio, 2006). Therefore, the followers will be highly motivated to perform beyond leaders’ expectations (Howell and Avolio,
Chapter 11 of Peter Senge's book, The Fifth Discipline, talks about the idea of Shared Vision, and how this concept has transformed organizations, and individuals working for them, into a cohesive unit of long-term innovative achievement.
No one wants to follow a leader who is not visionary; hence, great turmoil arises between leader and follower when the leader lacks both vision and strategy (Yukl, 2010). In many instances, leaders who lack vision suffer the effects of several interrelated problems that include: poor communication, the inability to be forward-looking, and the unwillingness to share the vision with others because of fear (Shead, 2016). Fear, at times can be a legitimate concern in leadership, principally when the leader’s credibility is at stake over a failed project; however, fear is an impediment to mutual accountability, honesty, and trust between leader and follower (CCBS, 2016), because of fear, leaders often fail to pursue what could be and thereby damage leadership effectiveness and the potential of an organization (Shead,
L. Larwood, C. M. Falke, M.P. Kriger, and P. Miesing. Structure and meaning of organizational vision. Academy of Management Journal, 39, 1995, pp.740-769
He made it a focus to know and learn the business inside and out. His company needed to develop a deep understanding of its customers needs. Taking all of these strategy targets into consideration is vital but execution only goes so far. Although it is the most critical part of a successful strategy, “getting it done, getting it done right, getting it done better than the next person is far more important then dreaming up new visions for the
The purpose of this vision. Which explains why Marriott choose this vision and who is involved.
Today’s companies become successful based on their abilities to create and manage change. They can no longer survive without “…courage and imagination – the courage to challenge prevailing business models and the imagination to invent new markets.'; As the globe continues to evolve into a marketplace with vanishing boundaries, competition becomes stronger, tighter, and smarter than ever before, ultimately forcing organizational change. The tidal strength of competition that has been upon us over the past few decades has fundamentally changed the “blueprints'; of many corporations and how they now need to be led. Businesses have awakened to the hard fact that leadership can no longer be defined by the effective management of people and systems, but most importantly by the effective leading of change. Leadership, or the lack thereof, is proving to be one of the most crucial determinants of whether organizations will survive and flourish in the next century’s business frontier.
Leaders: Strategies for Taking Charge is an organizational management book written by Warren Bennis and Burt Nanus for those who aim to become better leaders. The authors emphasize that having executive positions or being a manager does not automatically make one a leader. A leader is one who inspires his staff, help them find purpose in their work, and effectively implement their plans. They separate the book not quite into chapters on different topics, but rather by four strategies that they have determined are vital for any leader to take on. The strategies are effectively concluded as attention through vision, meaning through communication, trust through positioning, and the deployment of self. A prominent feature of Leaders is the various
Provide appropriate leadership and a strategic framework, including mission, vision, values, and goals. People want to feel as if they are part of something bigger than themselves.
The monumental consequences of strategic decisions call for individuals with unique performance abilities who can navigate the volatility, uncertainty, complexity, and ambiguity. inherent in the nature of those decisions. Aspiring leaders can rise to the challenge by undergoing self-assessment and personal.