Strategic Leadership

1083 Words3 Pages

Strategic Leadership

The only thing harder than being a strategic leader is trying to

define the entire scope of strategic leadership a broad, difficult

concept. We cannot always define it or describe it in every detail,

but we recognize it in action. This type of leadership involves

microscopic perceptions and macroscopic expectations. Volumes have

been written on the subject, which may in fact contribute to the

difficulty of grasping the concept. One finds confusing and sometimes

conflicting information on this blended concept that involves the

vagaries of strategy and the behavioral art of leadership. Sometimes

the methods and models used to explain it are more complicated than

the concept and practice of strategic leadership itself. Exercising

this kind of leadership is complicated, but understanding it doesn’t

have to be. Beginning with a definition and characterization of

strategic leadership and then exploring components of the strategic

environment may prove helpful. Future leaders must also recognize the

nature of that environment. Finally, they should also have some

familiarity with ways of developing competencies for dealing with the

broad, new challenges that are part of leading in the strategic

environment.

What Is Strategic Leadership.

The common usage of the term strategic is related to the concept of

strategy—simply a plan of action for accomplishing a goal. One finds

both broad and narrow senses of the adjective strategic. Narrowly, the

term denotes operating directly against military or industrial

installations of an enemy during the conduct of war with the intent of

destroying his military potential. Today, strategic is used more often

in its broader sense. Thus, we use it to relate something’s primary

importance or its quintessential aspect for instance, the most

advantageous, complex, difficult, or potentially damaging challenge to

a nation, organization, culture, people, place, or object. When we

recognize and use strategic in this broad sense, we append such

meanings as the most important long-range planning, the most complex

and profound decisions, and the most advantageous effects from a

bombing campaign as well as leaders with the highest conceptual

ability to make decisions.

As mentioned earlier, strategy is a plan whose aim is to link ends,

ways, and means. The difficult part involves t...

... middle of paper ...

...e, again, to expand their perspective and increase their

conceptual ability. In fact, many of them are experts in a number of

unrelated fields. Becoming a dual expert helps one think in multiple

dimensions.

After committing to some or all of these development activities,

potential leaders should reflect on each activity as a way of mining

the total benefit and seeking greater meaning. They will also benefit

from mentoring other leaders and being mentored themselves. When

mentors share their experiences, they help others know and understand

them.

Conclusion

The many components of the strategic-leadership environment challenge

even the best leaders. The monumental consequences of strategic

decisions call for individuals with unique performance abilities who

can navigate the volatility, uncertainty, complexity, and ambiguity

inherent in the nature of those decisions. Aspiring leaders can rise

to the challenge by undergoing self-assessment and personal

development. Accepting the demands of strategic leadership involves a

transition from the art of the familiar to the art of the possible.

This is the realm of strategic leadership and the strategic

environment.

Open Document