Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Essays on gun control for school safety
Why our campuses are safer without guns essay main ideas
Eng 112 opposing viewpoints guns on campus
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
[Brock Kako] [Mr. Bolton] [9th Grade English] [12-9-15] [Firearms should be Allowed on College Campuses] Introduction Paragraph: Attention Grabber: On April 16, 2007 there was an attack at Virginia Tech killing 33 including the perpetrator. Informative Statements: This shooter was Seung-Hui Cho who killed 32 then later killed himself, he was armed with Glock 19 and a Walther P22, this attack may have been cut short if the campus had allowed students and faculty to carry firearms. Thesis Statement: Firearms should be allowed on college campuses because it would give students and faculty a way to defend themselves if an attacker such as Cho tried to injure or kill them. Body Paragraph 1: Major Point I Protection in Campus Classes …show more content…
and Dorms Supporting Point: Students and Faculty Have the Right to defend themselves and others around them. If colleges required some students to carry firearms then it could prevent another tragedy such as the Virginia Tech shooting. It seems as though the places that are attacked most often are gun-free zones such as schools and hospitals sadly, that is due to the fact that the criminals who attack these types of places can get little to no resistance against them so they can deal a large amount of damage and high loss of life. Take California for example, they have the strictest gun control policy in the whole United States yet there are attacks like San Bernardino where there is a higher death toll which could have been reduced if they were allowed to have a firearm in that situation. Body Paragraph 2: Supporting Point: If an intruder were to come into a classroom I would want to be able to defend myself or others defend me. Firearms in education buildings in general would be good because then an instructor can defend their class from intruders and shooters. Furthermore the students can rely on themselves and not just the police and the instructors. Body Paragraph 3: Counter-argument (refute or concede): If guns were allowed in schools it would be a good idea but then if it was stolen by another student then there would be a serious problem at the campus. Then there is the fact that at colleges around the US, drug and alcohol consumption is common and I think we all know that guns and alcohol don’t go well together. Then the most serious situation would be if a student didn’t agree with the grade they had gotten then they could try to threaten the teacher or the dean of the school. Body Paragraph 4: Major Point II Schools should make a law that requires instructors to have a concealed carry license Explain this major point Whenever people attack places they tend to go to places where they know they can’t be deterred easily. You hardly ever see places such as military bases, police headquarters, shooting ranges, gun stores, or even Walmart get attacked because all those places have firearms and criminals go where they can rack up the body count such as schools or hospitals or even movie theaters. Body Paragraph 5: Supporting Point In some situations if a teacher had a firearm many lives could have been saved from a shooting. It is thought that if there are more firearms in an area there is less likely to be an attack at that area and sometimes it is even proven. The shooting at Virginia Tech was a tragic day in America but if a student or professor was armed the number of deaths could have been greatly reduced. Body Paragraph 6: Counter-argument (refute or concede) Some people believe that situations where there is an attacker the occupants on campus should just lock up in their dorms and wait while faculty should just wait and notify the police. If a professor had a firearm it could be stolen and then there could be a mass shooting in the future. If police arrived then they could confuse faculty with the shooter. Body Paragraph 7: Major Point III More firearms means less crime in areas. Explain this major point The more firearms in an area the less likely that place is going to be attacked.
Take the White House for example, the building is protected from every angle by firearms and there have been few people to make it across the grounds. Then take San Bernardino for example, they had no firearms in the building and the place was attacked and many people lost their live. Body Paragraph 8: Supporting Point Why should college campuses be any different? They contain the country’s future presidents, senators and judges. They are also one of the most vulnerable places because most colleges don’t allow firearms on campus. The most important factor is that many students don’t pay attention to their surroundings so they are put in dangerous situations and they should be able to defend themselves to a certain extent. Body Paragraph 9: Counter-argument (refute or concede) There is a difference between the White House and college campuses. Campuses contain future leaders but the White House contains the most important man in the nation and possibly the world. The White House needs to have firearms to defend against attackers while college students could just have a taser or pepper spray, they could even learn a self defense course to defend
themselves. Body Paragraph 10: Conclusion Paragraph- Firearms are a very important tool that can both end or save a life, it is a tool that requires great responsibility and care. College students can be reckless but they should go through a rigorous gun safety course or if they already have a gun safety certificate they can go through a rigorous permit to carry course. Firearms are a tool that in the right hands can be a very helpful confidence booster and defense mechanism. Firearms are not what hurt people, it is people that hurt people.
In “Stop Worrying About Guns in the Classroom. They’re Already here.” the author, Erik Gilbert, argues in favor of the law allowing the concealed carry of firearms in college campuses. Gilbert claims that it’s futile to be “worried by the prospect of having guns in [the] classroom” because he believes that even before the bill was passed, some students and faculty were already carrying firearms to campus (Gilbert). Furthermore, he insinuates that despite the presence of firearms, there were no incidents of student or faculty causing harm. To support his argument, the author provides incidents which have occurred over the last decade at his campus, such as accidental discharge of guns in dorms, firearms in student’s vehicles, and one faculty member who was discovered to be in possession of a gun in an on-campus facility. Considering these incidents and previous knowledge of “prevailing regional attitudes towards guns”, the author assumes that significant numbers of students, and possibly faculty, bring guns on campus regularly (Gilbert). As for those who are afraid due to the new law, he declares to them that firearm permit-holders are not dangerous by comparing the rate of their crimes to that of police officers. He also reasons that permit holders need to be at least 21 to qualify—claiming that the more mature students qualify—and have background checks performed.
People who disagree with me think that there should be concealed gun carry on college campuses because it will make the students safer in a risky situation by making the students able to shoot down and stop the shooter. Students for Concealed Carry, an organization for concealed gun carry on campus, say, “The crux of the SGFS essay is the undeniable fact that college campuses typically have lower crime rates than the cities in which they reside” (642). In “Why Our Campuses Are Safer Without Concealed Handguns”, an article against concealed handgun carry, states that, “Our colleges and universities are safe sanctuaries for learning.” (633).
Many politicians and public figures had shared their opinions about the campus carry law, William H. McRaven a for Navy SEAL, and former commander of the United States Special operations forces who raided and directed the killing of Osama bin Laden, and the chancellor of the University of Texas opposed to having weapons on campus. A man who has many guns and has a love for many guns, says that it will not make campuses any safer than they are now. McRaven also was a public figure that joined with the interest groups and stated why he thought the weapons on campus would not be a good idea. Texas senator Brian Birdwell, who is a republican, the bill’s chief architect, and a retired Army Lieutenant agrees with the campus carry on law. Many universities
Gun-control laws are a very controversial topic right now in the U.S., especially when it comes to allowing concealed-carry holders on college campuses. Nevertheless, guns should be permitted for concealed carry on college campuses if the carriers have concealed-carry licenses because mass shootings occur mostly in gun-free zones. There have been many incidents in which concealed-carry holders have disarmed attackers, and concealed-carry holders are overwhelmingly law-abiding citizens. However, the argument’s opponents believe guns should not be allowed on college campuses for various reasons, including: professors might be afraid to issue bad grades, a gun may go off by accident, college
Taking privileges away from the majority of mentally stable, healthy, hard working Americans just because a percentage of alcoholics, drug addicts, gang members, and mentally ill individuals are to blame for the school shootings, murders and suicides, would just be insane. So, why is the government trying to implement more strict gun laws for the people that don't do these heinous crimes. The debate on if the government should take the guns away from all the citizens in order to stop these crimes would not stop those who are committing the crimes in the first place. Then, the question would be, how would we know who really has the guns and where they are?
College is seen as the beginning of young adult life, but campus crime can prevent the continuation of that life.Yet, campuses still prohibit students from carrying essential self defense weapons. This is most likely due to their ignorance of the benefits involved with allowing campus carry. Campus carry improves the overall environment of a college and promotes safety. Students should be allowed to carry guns on campus due to the current lack of protection offered through the university and an individual’s lawful right, despite the belief that it would cause an escalation in violent crime.
Alternatively, the people who believe that concealed weapons should be allowed in college campus state that they are are allowed to because of what the second amendment. The second amendment allows for any resident of the United States to be able to buy and own a concealed weapon of their choice. Students for Concealed Carry state the point that a person should be allowed to own a gun if they wish to be able to feel safe and protect themselves by stating, “Why should a 105-pound woman who is allowed the means to defend herself against a 250-pound would-be rapist outside of campus not be afforded the same right on campus” (647)? Other people also believe that having a gun would be able to deter the shooter. They believe the shooter would be stopped just by the thought of him going to a place filled with guns would trigger feat in their brain and make them rethink that they are about to do. “It’s hard to attain infamy if a concealed handgun license holder ends your shooting spree before it begins” (Students for Concealed Carry 647). The final point most people who are for concealed carry on campus is that they believe they would be able to stop the shooter faster or before he even begins the shoot...
In 2007, thirty-three students and faculty were shot and killed by a former classmate at Virginia Tech University. The shooter, Seung-Hui Cho, was a senior at Virginia Tech and was majoring in English. Two years earlier before the attack, Cho was ordered by a judge to seek help after making suicidal remarks to his roommate.
Guns should be banned from all college campuses nationwide. Many students, teachers, and college presidents strongly oppose hidden, loaded guns on campuses because it will lead to increased violence, accidental shootings, and the non-carrying public would feel unsafe around the carrying public. If all elementary to high schools have a strict ban on guns for their campuses, it seems logical to extend the ban up to higher education. Now that it is more common for students in high school to take dual classes on a college campus, extending would ensure safety of the minors. Guns have a purpose at other arenas, but on a campus that is intended for learning and education it would be best to keep
College campuses are more dangerous than ever because of the past decade; guns have not only been manufactured in excess, but availability and ease of accessibility. According to James Cool (2008), a supporter of guns on campus, reasoned why the increase of weapons occurred recently; “Our nation was founded … during the same time that modern firearms were invented and became readily available due to the Industr...
The Virginia Tech shooting, also known as the Virginia Tech massacre, was a school shooting that took place on April 16, 2007, on the campus of Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University in Blacksburg, Virginia. Seung-Hui Cho, a senior at Virginia Tech, shot and killed thirty-two people and wounded seventeen others in two separate attacks, about two hours apart, before committing suicide. Another six people were injured trying to escape from the classroom windows. The attack is the deadliest school shooting by a single gunman in U.S. history and one of the deadliest by one single gunman worldwide. The attacks received international media coverage and speculation. It created an intense debate about gun violence, gun laws, gaps in the U.S. system for treating mental health issues, the shooter’s state of mind, the responsibility of college administrations, privacy laws, journalism ethics, and other issues
Gun control is a highly controversial topic in today’s world where the fight is between the liberal and the conservatives. Many people believe that guns should be banned due to many recent massacres that have happened whereas others are wanting people to have background checks done before owning a gun. I am against gun control because banning handguns in the United States should not be allowed because handguns fail to protect the people and it is ineffective.
Due to the recent disruption of violent crimes on campus, many citizens that are pro-gun activist have suggested that both the students and teachers should be allowed to carry concealed weapons on school campuses. Those who are with guns allowed on school campuses claim that their rights have been violated for the reason that many college campuses refuse to allow weapons of any kind on their property. The Constitution of The United States of America already grants citizens the right to carry guns with them. It is not appropriate for guns to be in a vulnerable area such as a college campus or any University. There are already too many guns available to the public or easy to get any kind of gun, and allowing them on
In the past years, several schools and college campuses have suffered many shooting attacks, killing innocent people who just want to become professional and finish their careers. Those shooters have been caused by other students that might have personal or mental problems that make them think that they can solve their problems by shooting and killing people. This is why many people are arguing about the second amendment, if guns should be allowed on college campuses. Some arguments are: students are going to be more secure and they will be able to defend themselves in case that someone starts shooting. However, there is also a large amount of people who believe that if guns are allowed on college campuses there would be an increase of
Shooters go for the defenseless for they can not fight back. Those lives are lost and can never be brought back, they can be protected. If before a murderous intention gunman opens fire upon innocent defenseless civilians, what if someone was armed and could take the gun man down before all those lives are taken. Now imagine the devastation if no one was armed except for a murderous gunman and how many lives would be lost. We have gun laws, we have an Amendment to give us our right to own and use a gun, as well as good law obeying citizen who are responsible and can protect those who cannot protect themselves. If guns were taken or even more of a challenge to legally obtain, then people will not be able to protect themselves and others during tragic events of a