French Revolution Dbq

1199 Words3 Pages

The revolutions that swept the world from 1765 to 1815 was an era marked by both relatively peaceful enlightenment based overthrows of repressive governments, and extremely bloody uprisings based on violence and the repression of its own citizens. The United States revolution lasting from 1775 to 1783 and the French revolution lasting from 1789 to 1799 fit these descriptions perfectly; and although they both fall under the same time period, these revolutions could not differ more. When compared to each other, the ideas that the American and French revolutions were founded on were similar, but the outcomes and the ways in which each revolution were executed were vastly different. The revolutions of the eighteenth century revealed a change …show more content…

Unsurprisingly enough, the same problem that existed within Britain over the French and Indian war were now appearing in France: how were they going to pay for the wars. France’s answer to this problem was the implementation of a heavily flawed system of borrowing and taxation, with borrowing being the majority of the income (Klooster 45-46). Over the next five years, the economic policies of Jacques Necker pushed France’s economy into a state of disrepair, ruining any chance of France recovering their economy. This king came down to two options: default on their loans and declare bankruptcy, continuing the trend of this action, or calling the estates general, France’s closest institution to a parliament. He chose the latter, but this did little to resolve the animosity that was brewing due to the horrible financial state of the country. Anger over hunger, unemployment, and terrible economic conditions finally caused protest to become revolution. In 1789, an armed crowed stormed and captured the bastille, a prison meant to hold political prisoners. The storming of the bastille was much more than just an attack on a prison; it was an attack on a symbol of the oppressiveness and brutality of the French monarchy. Soon after the …show more content…

Interestingly enough, some people consider the idea of referring to the American Revolution as a revolution as a misnomer. Friedrich Gentz, a German conservative who was staunchly against revolutions or any use of political violence to achieve a social change, certainly agreed, writing “…the American Revolution was a legitimate revolution, since it was not really a revolution. Its goal was to establish a constitutional regime… [and it] did not unleash large-scale violence” (Gentz). And in most parts this was true. But what really made the American Revolution revolutionary was that it replaced the government that it overcame with one run not by a king, but by the people. If you only look at the outcome, it’s almost as if a revolution never happened. They went from having a king, nobility, and an established religion, to having a king, nobility and established religion

Open Document