Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
French revolution causes effects and impact
Effects of the French Revolution
Causes and impacts of the french revolution
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: French revolution causes effects and impact
The Paris Commune and the representatives on mission were not the only ones insistent on creating a more secular and non-Christian society, as the National Convention itself participated in the dechristianization movement as many of its members sided with Chaumette and Fouché during the latter months of 1793. Charles Gilbert Romme, one of the Revolutionaries frequently labeled an atheist by books and websites dedicated to naming influential atheists in history, participated in the Committee of Public Instruction—the agency instrumental to spreading knowledge on how the citizens should react to new laws implemented by the National Convention. He trained as a mathematician and medical doctor, and then travelled to Russia to serve as the tutor …show more content…
These sanctions were readily accepted by the National Convention. Romme’s suggested curriculum emphasized utility and reason, focusing on language, science, philosophy, and natural history instead of theology.100 Nonetheless, none of Romme’s recorded suggestions or decrees declares religion a falsehood or God non-existent, and as with many revolutionaries of the 1790s, his motivation for promoting anti-Christian measures was as likely based on a desire to break from the traditions of the ancien régime than to formulate the destruction of Christianity or theism.
Jacques-Léonard Laplanche, one of the first “répresentants” to implement acts of extreme dechristianization, utilized the Army of the People to put down any who resisted the dechristianziation movement. Yet only a year before, Laplanche submitted a report to the National Convention
…show more content…
When Marie-Joseph Chénier, a poet and dramatist who wrote an entire book of poetry dedicated to the Cult of Reason, addressed the Convention on November 5, 1793, he did not declare an end to religion, but rather proposed that Catholicism be replaced by a revolutionary cult to be built on “the ruins of fallen superstition.”123 His poems, though dedicated to the concepts of “reason” and “nature,” were filled with allusions to “immortality,” and one even reassured believers that “they never pretended to deny the good people, the existence of the supreme being, supreme engine of all things.”124 Meanwhile, in the department of Haut-Rhin, a pamphlet circulated to explain the actions taken against the churches and priests with a “Jacobin curé” explaining that this was not intended as an attack on God, but rather an attempt to prevent “charlatan abuses of the name of God.”125 Thus, God was not necessarily being rejected, but rather he was being reconstituted as a part of the Republic itself. Instead of a barbarous man in the sky who arbitrarily struck sinners down like a madman, he was reimagined as XYZ. Emulating Émile Durkheim proposition that religion translates human needs and prohibitions, Albert Mathiez argued a century ago that the culte de la patrie, “is a religion without mysteries,
Doyle, William, and Colin Haydon, eds. Robespierre. Cambridge ; New York, NY: Cambridge University Press, 1999.
Maximilien Robespierre became obsessed with this passion to create equality within France and to abolish the segregation that he began to be worshiped by others and seen as a beacon of hope. They both hoped that the Tribunal would bring peace to France. It would crush the Royalists and quiet mob by reassuring that the enemies of the revolution would be punished.” (DiConsiglio).
The Declaration’s proclamations of the “unalienable and sacred rights of man,” point towards religious undertones; however, Revolutionary France discontinued a state religion (National Assembly). Therefore, although the language of the document indicates a religion influence, it shies away from a religious focus. Thus, the Deistic thought which stemmed from the Enlightenment, although somewhat muted, clearly inspired the course of the French documents in a similar manner to that of the United States, in spite of the evolving viewpoints of the time. In addition to a religious disposition, statements regarding the “natural, unalienable, and sacred rights of man,” indicate humanistic and morally inclined focuses from the Enlightenment (National
Beginning in mid-1789, and lasting until late-1799, the French Revolution vastly changed the nation of France throughout its ten years. From the storming of the Bastille, the ousting of the royal family, the Reign of Terror, and all the way to the Napoleonic period, France changed vastly during this time. But, for the better part of the last 200 years, the effects that the French Revolution had on the nation, have been vigorously debated by historian and other experts. Aspects of debate have focused around how much change the revolution really caused, and the type of change, as well as whether the changes that it brought about should be looked at as positive or negative. Furthermore, many debate whether the Revolutions excesses and shortcomings can be justified by the gains that the revolution brought throughout the country. Over time, historians’ views on these questions have changed continually, leading many to question the different interpretations and theories behind the Revolutions effectiveness at shaping France and the rest of the world.
The French Revolution evokes many different emotions and controversial issues in that some believe it was worth the cost and some don't. There is no doubt that the French Revolution did have major significance in history. Not only did the French gain their independence, but an industrial revolution also took place. One of the main issues of the Revolution was it's human costs. Two writers, the first, Peter Kropotkin who was a Russian prince, and the other Simon Schama, a history professor, both had very opposing views on whether the wars fought by France during the Revolution were worth it's human costs. Krapotkin believed that the French Revolution was the main turning point for not only France but for most other countries as well. On the other hand, Schama viewed the French Revolution as unproductive and excessively violent.
The towns and provinces of France were against the growing power of monarchical centralization, so the people were very willing to join in the revolt against the monarchy. The nobility agreed with the thinking of the people, and because much of the nobility were Calvinists, they formed an important, strong foundation for the opposition of the monarchy. The wars temporarily halted the development of the French centralized territorial state, and a person’s loyalty to their religion overcame a person’s loyalty to their state’s ruling family. In all this religious conflict emerged a group that placed politics above religion, and this group believed that no religion was worth the side effects of a civil war. The politiques eventually prevailed, but it was too late as both sides had lost a great number of
The Committee of Public Safety’s use of violence in order to exert control over French citizens seemed to reflect a power-hungry nature and an attempt to impose a strict government. On September 5, 1793, the Committee declared that terror was “the Order of the Day,” allowing them to use force against citizens in order to carry on the revolution (Timeline). During this time, constant uprisings, such as protests in Vendée on
The French Revolution was a period of political upheaval that occurred in France during the latter half of the 18th century. This revolution marked an end to the system of feudalism and the monarchy in France and a rise to democracy and new Enlightenment ideas. By 1789, when the revolution began, France was in a deep financial crisis due to the debt they had obtained over many years of reckless spending and France was nearly bankrupt. These financial issues fell almost completely on the bottom social class or the Third Estate which made up a majority of the country. Because of this financial trouble the common people were heavily taxed leaving many of them in poverty. In addition to the economic issues, France also held an Estate System that led to heavy
In 1789, thousands of starving peasants abandoned the lands of their ancestors as the price of bread rose to eighty percent of the average peasant’s income (Kreis). Blazing buildings marked the path they took to the source of their woes in Paris. They attacked any food cart they passed. The outline of their skeleton could be seen from under their filthy, thread-bare clothing. Their impoverished condition had reached its climax. Their desperation led them to action. They over took the largest fortress in France, the Bastille, in search of weapons. Members of the Bourgeoisie had formed the National Assembly three weeks prior to the storming of the Bastille to begin to address the grievances of the peasants (Dabney). On August 4, the National Assembly met in Paris, and, with one enthusiastic fell swoop, they agreed to abolish the feudal system forever, thus gaining the support of the mob. “The Decree of the National Assembly Abolishing the Feudal System” created equality between the nobility and citizens, ended the Church’s authority over the state, and pledged to work with King Louis XVI to rectify the injustices of the people.
Proving to be the paramount of the conflict between faith and reason, the European Enlightenment of the eighteenth century challenged each of the traditional values of that age. Europeans were changing, but Europe’s institutions were not keeping pace with that change.1 Throughout that time period, the most influential and conservative institution of Europe, the Roman Catholic Church, was forced into direct confrontation with these changing ideals. The Church continued to insist that it was the only source of truth and that all who lived beyond its bounds were damned; it was painfully apparent to any reasonably educated person, however, that the majority of the world’s population were not Christians.2 In the wake of witch hunts, imperial conquest, and an intellectual revolution, the Roman Catholic Church found itself threatened by change on all fronts.3 The significant role that the Church played during the Enlightenment was ultimately challenged by the populace’s refusal to abide by religious intolerance, the power of the aristocracy and Absolutism, and the rising popularity of champions of reform and print culture, the philosophes, who shared a general opposition to the Roman Catholic Church.
The French people were quick to blame the government for all the misfortune they possess, yet ignored the potential evil or crisis the social body was heading towards within themselves. Because of the rapid sequence of horrific events in the beginning of the French revolution, it prevented the subversive principles to be spread passes the frontiers of France, and the wars of conquest which succeeded them gave to the public mind a direction little favorable to revolutionary principles (2). French men have disgraced the religion by ‘attacking with a steady and systematic animosity, and all it is there that the weapon of ridicule has been used with the most ease and success (2). Metternich was not in support of the French
The Declaration defines a set of collective and individual rights for all men while emphasizing the principles of popular sovereignty, in contrast to the divine right of kings that characterized that of the French monarchy. It sought to establish social equality and that all citizens would be considered equal in the eyes of the law which ultimately assisted in eliminating the special rights of the nobility and clergy. However, we begin to see where part of the revolution fails when it starts to become more radical and committing to its insistence of more power and relief from economic distress. After the execution of Louis XVI at the guillotine, the revolution began to spiral into a reign of terror due to the formation of the Committee of Public Safety which instated new policies to dispose of those that they saw as
... to make you commit injustices.” Voltaire studied natural sciences and reason because he was against supestition. Although he advocated religious tolerance, he believed that any one church should not have absolute power. By the time he was executed, he had already brought about the end of the power and right of the church to torture France. People in France still are not as faithful to the Catholic Church as they had been before Voltaire had introduced them to the idea of “reasoning”.
First, Georges-Jacques Danton's significant leadership during the French Revolution was highlighted by his efforts to partake in the National Convention. The National Convention was similar to our modern Congress, and it passed bills and undertook the same responsibilities as our Congress. One can observe that Danton was an ups...
p. 103. 2 Ibid., p. 81 3 Gustave Le Bon, The Psychology of revolution, (USA,