Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
The essay French Revolution
The essay French Revolution
The essay French Revolution
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
When asked if an event was successful or not, one must take into account every aspect of the event. “Success” is a very subjective and imprecise word. In history, when one power or group feels that they have succeeded in their goal, the opposing group will most likely feel that they have failed. During the French Revolution (1789-1799), there were many successes and failures that took place in the stages of the revolution that led to an eventual failure for the middle-class bourgeoisie and a moderate success in its attempt to achieve its goals for the poor lower class. In order to fully comprehend what aspects of the French Revolution were successful and which were not, one must first have knowledge as to what the goals of the revolutionaries …show more content…
were. At the beginning of the Revolution, in 1789, a list of grievances from the Third Estate, titled “Cahiers de Doleances” (Source 1:3), was written under command of King Louis XVI as his way to find out what it was that his people wanted.
What he expected to be a short list ended up being pages of complaints and calls for reformation. Throughout the “Cahiers”, a common theme of Enlightenment ideals was prominent. One point in the article demanded natural rights, saying that their rights “should be consecrated as fundamental principles of the monarchy.” (Source 1:3). This idea of equal and infallible rights for all people was a key part of the Enlightenment movement that greatly influenced the French Revolution. Another grievance noted in the “Cahiers” was the unfair taxation across the three Estates. As shown by Source 1:2, a graph representing the population, land ownership, and government taxation percentages in Pre-Revolutionary France for all three Estates, the Third Estate was paying 100% of the country’s government taxes. A call to order in the “Cahiers” was made regarding the corrupt taxation occurring in France, stating that “No order, corporation or individual citizen may lay claim to any pecuniary exemptions….All taxes should be assessed on the same system throughout the nation.” (Source 1:3). This point clearly states that the people wanted fair and binding taxation for all of France, not just the Third Estate. Additionally, the “Cahiers”
expressed the people's desire to be a part of their government, stating that “the nation should hereafter be subject only to such laws and taxes as it shall itself freely ratify.” (Source 1:3). In this quote from the article, the people are requesting that only laws and taxes that they themselves ratify are placed upon them. Finally, the people request that the National Assembly does all thing for the people and for peace in “all matters that may accord with the beneficent views of his Majesty, the welfare of the kingdom, the union of the three estates, and public peace.” (Source 1:3). This point is a call for protection from their government, not just from outside offenders, but also from those within; it is a call for brotherhood among all of France. From the grievances in the “Cahiers de Doleances”, the goal of the French Revolution is quite clear; liberty, equality, and fraternity were what the people of France wanted, and they would do anything to get it.
The French Revolution was a period of political upheaval that occurred in France during the latter half of the 18th century. This revolution marked an end to the system of feudalism and the monarchy in France and a rise to democracy and new Enlightenment ideas. By 1789, when the revolution began, France was in a deep financial crisis due to the debt they had obtained over many years of reckless spending and France was nearly bankrupt. These financial issues fell almost completely on the bottom social class or the Third Estate which made up a majority of the country. Because of this financial trouble the common people were heavily taxed leaving many of them in poverty. In addition to the economic issues, France also held an Estate System that led to heavy
Beginning in mid-1789, and lasting until late-1799, the French Revolution vastly changed the nation of France throughout its ten years. From the storming of the Bastille, the ousting of the royal family, the Reign of Terror, and all the way to the Napoleonic period, France changed vastly during this time. But, for the better part of the last 200 years, the effects that the French Revolution had on the nation, have been vigorously debated by historian and other experts. Aspects of debate have focused around how much change the revolution really caused, and the type of change, as well as whether the changes that it brought about should be looked at as positive or negative. Furthermore, many debate whether the Revolutions excesses and shortcomings can be justified by the gains that the revolution brought throughout the country. Over time, historians’ views on these questions have changed continually, leading many to question the different interpretations and theories behind the Revolutions effectiveness at shaping France and the rest of the world.
Have you ever wondered what happened in the revolution? Would you know how to answer questions about it? Learn or discover when things happened?
The essential cause of the French revolution was the collision between a powerful, rising bourgeoisie and an entrenched aristocracy defending its privileges”. This statement is very accurate, to some extent. Although the collision between the two groups was probably the main cause of the revolution, there were two other things that also contributed to the insanity during the French revolution – the debt that France was in as well as the famine. Therefore, it was the juxtaposing of the bourgeoisie and the aristocracy as well as the debt and famine France was in that influenced the French Revolution.
Throughout history, countless uprisings have occurred. Historians classify any forcible overthrow of a government or social order in favor of a new system as a revolution. The success or failure of a revolution is directly related to the revolution’s causes and courses. The French Revolution was more successful than the Nicaraguan Revolution, because the Nicaraguan Revolution left the country in social and financial ruin, foreign powers had much greater interference, and it precipitated a period of political unrest with multiple leadership changes.
There are plenty of speculations concerning why there was a French Revolution and plenty of articles and books written on the subject of why did France revolutionize? Was it because France was following in the footsteps of the Americans and rebelling against a negligent monarch or was it because it was time for a reformation in France? Perhaps it was none of those reasons but because of a language sweeping that nation of France that calls the bourgeoisie, the foundation of the nation that was France, into action. Maybe the French Revolution began simply because the city-dwelling bourgeoisie overthrew the empowered nobility and monarchy, which is what most speculations, ultimately leads to. However, all of these assumptions may be partially true, but not the whole truth and therefore, are all wrong. The French Revolution occurred because of a series of dependent occurrences that led to the culmination of the members from the bourgeoisie storming the Bastille in July and the overthrowing of the monarchy and the nobility. The French Revolution began not because of one single, particular act like overthrowing a government or agitating the lower classes, but a combination of those reasons listed above and others not mentioned in this introduction but that will be addressed later in this paper.
The only way of determining whether Napoleon consolidated or betrayed the revolution is to explore his actions such as his military success, dictatorship and social reforms. The difficulty of this analysis is that Napoleon's motives for his actions determine whether he consolidated or betrayed the Revolution. If Napoleon betrayed the revolution, then he betrayed the ideals of liberty, equality and fraternity. For it is ideals rather than realities that Napoleon allegedly betrayed. The reality of the French revolution is 8 periods of constant change and succession of policies and leaders, with each new leader and party bringing amendments to the revolution.
The nobles had intended to marry within their own ranks, and making the nobility a closed group” (Spielvogel page 568). The third estate during this time had included people who had been the commoners of society, and they had been the overwhelming majority of the French population. They had been divided by their occupations, level of education, and wealth. The peasants in the third estate had made up 75-80 percent of the total population, owning also about 35 to 40 percent of the land. “The third estate did not just include the commoners of society, but had also included skilled artisans, shopkeepers, and other wage earners in the cities. The third estate had also a struggle for survival and had led them to play an important role in the revolution, especially in the city of Paris” (Spielvogel page 568-569). “Louis had eventually established the estates general and had soon became disappointed, the clergy and the aristocracy can easily vote out the third estate, two to one which they had done repeatedly. The first estate had joined the third estate and when they had joined together the third estate had realized that it had been the only
...pave the way for democracy, but the bloodshed could have been more limited. Many people during the Revolution believed that France needed a change in many ways. They had achieved that by 1793. Many new reforms had been implemented in the country and it was much better off than it had been four years prior. I do agree with Kropotkin that the abolishing of serfdom and absolutism was a great achievement for France and that it did lead to a democratic system. Though this is true, the violence and bloodshed during the Revolution could have been minimized through committees and discussions. Schama is also right in that some men were too radical and their new found power went to their head. All said and done, the French Revolution was a bloody time in history, but it paved the way for a new democratic system not only for France but for many other countries as well.
During the french revolution many events shaped the country into the place it would become. Uprisings and battle for control would keep the country on its toes for many years before eventually it would stop. People were questioning everything and revelling against authority left and right. Blood would paint the streets before eventually it was quelled. Some of the most crucial events were the execution of Louis XVI, The Reign of Terror and the rise of Napoleon.
In all of the documents listed, liberty and equality are described with regards to the French Revolution. These concepts are shown to have evolved over the course of the revolution, and this is proven by the documents chosen. Liberty and equality were emphasized as either major or minor ideas in the documents, and although some were only alluded to, it is evident that the ideas of liberty and equality changed during the years of the French Revolution. Also, some of the terms used connoted different things at the end of the Revolution than the original Revolutionaries of 1789, which demonstrates the transformation of the use of words which were symbolic at that time.
The French Revolution was caused by inherent problems within France like the social inequality, inefficient monarchy and the financial crisis and was fueled by the Enlightenment ideas. Perhaps it could have been entirely avoided if the monarchy worked harder to reform the country before it was too late or perhaps this would have just postponed the revolution. Either way, it is undeniable that the French Revolution had far-reaching effects. It inspired later revolutions and gave birth to a host of new ideas about an individual’s rights and a country’s obligations to its citizens.
Within the Historical sphere, there is no unanimity regarding the impact of the French revolution on the status quo of western Europe. The argument lies that the revolution was insurgent and promoted ideas contrary to conventional belief, thus leaving an enduring impact stemming from nationalism and liberalism, on France and western Europe. In contrast, many individuals affirm the position that the changes yielded from the revolution was reversed by reactionary responses consequently discrediting the revolution's significance to Europe. As a result, I will be evaluating both arguments and will arrive at a measured conclusion, whether the French Revolution (1789) threatened the status quo (state of affairs) in Western Europe and if so how.
Government, one of the greatest concepts of mankind since learning how to live together as a community. Government was designed to give order and to represent the people in their quest for happiness. When a government works well the majority of its citizens are satisfied with what the government is doing, but what happens when the government fall short of satisfying the basic needs of its citizens? When the current government fails a new one is the cry of its people. In many countries change is accomplished by a revolution. In France the National Assembly cried for revolution from its oppressive King and the Ancien Regime. They wanted to improve human rights. They wanted an improved economy and religious reform like the American Revolution. This is an argument that the French Revolution failed.
A society that was built on equality was the main goal in an important political movement. The Enlightenment ideas and philosophers acted as the stepping stones for a new foundation to be constructed. The influenced third estate radically changed France by abolishing the old habits of the corrupt regime and replaced it with a new, sustainable one. The Enlightenment progressed the French Revolution by influencing the French Revolutionists and by creating important documents. The ideas of Locke and constitutionalism, Montesquieu and government change, Voltaire's ideas on equality, and Beccaria on unjust torture, all these ideas pushed the French Revolution forward. The people of France began to believe in this system of belief that would save their country from despair. This belief system resulted in them revolting and advocating for change. Abby Sieyes' document helped kick start the desire for rising up, and then followed the Tennis Court Oath and the Declarations of the Rights of Man which implemented the existence of the revolution. The ideas of these Enlightenment thinkers in the French Revolution is evident, and although the ideas of Rousseau influenced Robespierre to halt the revolution, the end of his reign of terror also disrupted the radicalism. Thus, it cannot be doubted that the ideologies of the Enlightenment period progressed the success of the revolution in