Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
How social inequality contributed to the french Revolution
French revolution women equality
French revolution women equality
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
In all of the documents listed, liberty and equality are described with regards to the French Revolution. These concepts are shown to have evolved over the course of the revolution, and this is proven by the documents chosen. Liberty and equality were emphasized as either major or minor ideas in the documents, and although some were only alluded to, it is evident that the ideas of liberty and equality changed during the years of the French Revolution. Also, some of the terms used connoted different things at the end of the Revolution than the original Revolutionaries of 1789, which demonstrates the transformation of the use of words which were symbolic at that time.
Liberty and equality were both highly emphasized during the revolution, and
…show more content…
they were important to many of the revolutionaries in their arguments. For example, one of the original revolutionaries, Emmanuel Sieyes, wrote ‘What is the Third Estate,’ which asked that exact question, and he answered it by stating that the third estate is necessary for a strong nation, and despite this implying that it was necessary for success, at that time it was “shackled and oppressed,” and it, therefore, was not being granted the proper liberty and equality which it was highly deserving of. Sieyes made the simple but thoughtful point of asking what the third estate was by elaborating on how it was being suppressed, and if it was given more power, it would be free and flourishing, and everything would be going well in France. In 1789, the National Constituent Assembly passed the ‘Declaration of the Rights of Man and Citizen,’ which elaborated on the liberty which man deserved of which was to be granted through the ‘Rights of Man’ by stating that “each man has no limits,” except those determined by law. In Edward Burke’s Letter to a Young Frenchman, he states that one of the liberties of man which should never be changed is social freedom, and there would be liberty in justice. From these three documents it is evident that the revolutionaries believed that liberty was denoted by freedom to do what he feels is proper, and that there should be a good level of equality among the people. Over the next few years, there were a few other documents written which show the thoughts evolving into slightly different understandings.
In 1790, the Jews of Paris, Alsace and Lorraine wrote a petition to the National Assembly. In this petition, they asked that they finally be declared citizens, because religion does not change who a person is with regards to his country. This intriguing argument demonstrates that prior to this there was a major lack of equality, or at least, there was not complete equality, and the Jews in France had come to the point where the previous definition of a want for freedom and liberty was being minimized and the want for equality was coming into the picture. The petition continues by stating that the French “do not want [the Jews] to die, and yet [they] refuse them the means to live.” This line creates a won argument, because it addresses the current situation, and states what the non-Jews of France were thinking at that time, so they couldn’t reject a point which they knew was correct. Eventually, in 1791, just days before the dissolution of the national assembly, the Jews were granted equality under the law. Another document which proves that equality was becoming the central point instead of freedom or liberty was Mary Wollstonecraft’s A Vindication of the Rights of Women. Wollstonecraft makes her argument by first noting that women are denied of all political privileges, and have very few privileges when they get married. However, she …show more content…
says, women are equal in smarts and many other things which men were supposed to be better in, and that there is no reason for women not to have all of, if not almost all of, the rights of men. The thoughts of the Jews of France and Wollstonecraft clearly demonstrate that the concept of equality was evolving quickly, and liberty wasn’t really improving. In 1793, Robespierre wrote the Declaration of Rights, in which he states that the misfortunes of the world are caused by forgetting about the rights of man.
If the right of property is limited, society helps the citizens, and society provides subsistence for the citizens the world will be a better place. These ideas include both equality and liberty- equality in that the right of property should be limited, and liberty in the society helping the citizens and making sure that no one is left behind. In his speech in 1794, Robespierre said that they should want to achieve liberty, equality and justice, and that bad passions should be extinguished and replaced by good passions. Also, if this was set with laws, the nation will only have virtue and terror will be non-existent. These ideas also fall under the categories of both liberty and equality. This demonstrates that in between the five years of 1789-1794, the ideas of the revolutionists changed from liberty being the most important, to equality having principal, and finally to both sharing a key role in the French
Revolution. Liberty and equality were key ideas during the French Revolution. However, at some points one was dominant, while towards the end it all came together as one big idea of both liberty and equality. These terms were understood differently over the course of time, and although the ideas set forth by the original revolutionaries were very good, they evolved over time to fit in with the demand. Therefore, these key concepts which were so important during the French Revolution can be seen to have evolved based on the thoughts of that specific time until they were understood in a completely different way at the Revolution’s end in 1799.
The enlightenment ideas affected politics for both the French and the American peoples through the form of government and individual rights. Thinkers such as Jean-Jacques Rousseau, believed in the individual right of man as a citizen of a sovereign nation. In 1789, Marquis de Lafayette used Rousseau and other free thinker’s ideas to draft his Declaration of the Rights of Man and of the Citizen to the National Constituent Assembly in France (http://www.pbs.org/marieantoinette/revolution/america_france.html). This established universal rights for individuals that always existed at all times. The document shows many similarities to American documents such as the declaration of Human Rights in the U.S. Declaration of Independence and the Bill of Rights in the Constitution. For instance, they all show a relationship through the declaration of individual rights such as free speech and freedom of religion. However, the Declaration of the Rights of Man and of the Citizen focuses more on individualism while American documents focus more on a community “We the People” (http://www.pbs.org/marieantoin...
In 1685 there sparked a new age in Europe, the Enlightenment. During this time enlightened thinkers brought forth enhanced ideas of equality. Men, woman, rich, poor, monarchy, or peasant, everyone should have equal rights. In 1789 France was especially influenced by the new ideals. The french realized that they were still following the social ladder of the feudal system. They could not buy bread because of the raised prices, but the Monarchy was eating a feast for every meal. They had no say in what happened to their government, and their inadequate king kept making poor decisions. You might even say they took the enlightenment to the next level and started a revolution based on equality. Although the french were fighting for freedom (like the enlightened thinkers), they were not using reason or tolerance, two key elements of the Enlightenment.
Before the presence of equality came into play, some laws favored the rich over all others, and some only affected the poor; however, the growing middle class ended up being caught in the crosshairs of the two. During the Revolution, leaders went to protest this inequality, and in doing so went on to draw inspiration from the very ideas brought upon by Enlightenment thinkers, which in turn were the very building blocks of France’s 1789 Declaration of the Rights of
A common goal of the Declaration of the Rights of Man and the constitution was to secure equality between citizens. Robespierre contributes to this by ruling without the ancien regime, a social hierarchy that placed the nobility and clergy above the common people. Instead, he called for a republic and eliminated all potential opposition, preserving equality. He also changed the titles of monsieur and madame to simply, “citizen”. These were
The citizens of France, inspired by the enlightenment, desired a government run by the people. Marquis de Lafayette wrote, “Men are born and remain free and equal in rights; social distinctions may be based only upon general usefulness” (de Lafayette 783). The French wanted to bring equality to all classes. The French revolution brought much more social change than the American revolution. Inspired by Lafayette’s declaration that, “no group, no individual may exercise authority not emanating expressly therefrom” (de Lafayette 783), the class system was destroyed. The revolutionaries were open to ending slavery, however women remained marginalized within the social structure of France. Similarly to the American revolution, the enlightenment ideas that drove the French revolution were not applied to society as a
The French Revolution was a tumultuous period, with France exhibiting a more fractured social structure than the United States. In response, the French Declaration of the Rights of Man and Citizen proposed that “ignorance, neglect, or contempt of the rights of man are the sole cause of public calamities, and of the corruption of governments” (National Assembly). This language indicates that the document, like its counterpart in the United States, sought to state the rights of men explicitly, so no doubt existed as to the nature of these rights. As France was the center of the Enlightenment, so the Enlightenment ideals of individuality and deism are clearly expressed in the language of the document. The National Assembly stated its case “in
Beginning in mid-1789, and lasting until late-1799, the French Revolution vastly changed the nation of France throughout its ten years. From the storming of the Bastille, the ousting of the royal family, the Reign of Terror, and all the way to the Napoleonic period, France changed vastly during this time. But, for the better part of the last 200 years, the effects that the French Revolution had on the nation, have been vigorously debated by historian and other experts. Aspects of debate have focused around how much change the revolution really caused, and the type of change, as well as whether the changes that it brought about should be looked at as positive or negative. Furthermore, many debate whether the Revolutions excesses and shortcomings can be justified by the gains that the revolution brought throughout the country. Over time, historians’ views on these questions have changed continually, leading many to question the different interpretations and theories behind the Revolutions effectiveness at shaping France and the rest of the world.
The English Bill of Rights (1689) and the French Declaration of the Rights of Man (1789) are roughly around the same period, in that it is possible to think the both documents share similar ideologies. To the thought’s dismay, it is not. Even if both documents start from the same question of taxation, the outputs vary enormously in that each has different aims: the English Bill of Rights (shortened as the English Bill from now on) only changes the crown and the French Declaration of the Rights of Man (shortened as the French Declaration) changes the whole society. However, they are similar in that both strived for the representation of the masses.
The National Assembly, governing body in the beginning stages of the revolution, created the Declaration of Rights of Man and Citizen in August of 1789. The Declaration of Rights of Man and Citizen, recognizes the rights, and includes seventeen articles that state them thoroughly. The DORMAC seems like a step in the right direction for freedom and equality, but it is far from it. The Reign of Terror opposes all the articles and goes completely against them. This preamble to the new French constitution was nothing but a tremendous deception to the people. The innocent citizens faced unjustifiable death and pain. Article 1 states, “Men
The French Revolution was a period of time in which France underwent many changes, many which could be considered revolutionary. France’s whole system and way of being was completely changed. New ideas were proposed everyday. An idea is revolutionary when it is a new idea, when it is something that has never been thought of before. The Declaration of the Rights of Women written by Olympe de Gouges on September 1791, was one of the ideas proposed to the National Assembly (Hunt, Web 1). The document proposed that since the French Revolution was all about finding equality for all people, women should be equal to men and therefore, should have the same rights as men did. Women at the time live in terrible conditions. They had little access to education, and therefore could not enter professional occupations that required advanced education, were legally deprived of the right to vote, and were not considered citizens (Class Discussion Notes). If equal rights were not given to women, the French Revolution had not reached its full potential, according to Gouges. She expressed this idea in her document, saying, “This revolution will only take effect when all women become fully aware of their deplorable condition, and of the rights they have lost in society” (Gouges, Web). Anyone that questioned the Revolution was immediately put to death (Class Discussion Notes). If Gouges’ document and ideas were important enough to catch the attention of the National Assembly and for her to be put to death, her ideas could be considered important and revolutionary (Britannica, Web 1) But, the document was not revolutionary. The Declaration of the Rights of Women was not a revolutionary document because its ideas were taken from other people and were no...
Liberté, égalité, fraternité, this was the motto of the French Revolution. It was coined by Pierre Leroux in 1838. The years 1779-1789 saw everything from the first constitution of France being drawn up, to the “Reign of Terror” in which the symbolic guillotine proved to be both the judge and the executioner. The Revolution initially started in an attempt to make the king answer to the people, in an attempt to overthrow the absolutist role and in an attempt to gain equality in all areas including taxation. The financial crisis was a burden to heavy to bear for the Third Estate. The people grew hungry which swiftly turned to rage. The lack of results led to the end of the monarchy and the execution of both King Louis XVI and Queen Marie Antoinette. However, despite the bloodshed, the ideals that the French were fighting for were alive in their hearts. Liberty is the freedom to think or act without being constrained by necessity or force. In France, people were seeking liberty from the tyrannical rule of the monarch in which the Queen was using taxes to endow herself in riches. The second ideal, equality, consists of rights, treatment, quantity, or value equal to all others in a specific group. This meant getting rid of the hierarchical system and ensuring that nor the Church or nobles were exempt from taxation. The last ideal, brotherhood, means a group of people with feelings of friendship and mutual support between them. The French lacked this during the Revolution. Civil disobedience was present and very few showed camaraderie towards one another. Ten years of hardship, striving towards one common goal, sacrificing thousands of lives the French achieved what they set out to do. With great willpower and with the help of a benefac...
On August 26, 1789, the assembly issued the “Declaration of the Rights of Man and Citizen.” Through judicial matters, this document was written in order to secure due process and to create self-government among the French citizens. This document offered to the world and especially to the French citizens a summary of the morals and values of the Revolution, while in turn justifying the destruction of a government; especially in this case the French government, based upon autocracy of the ruler and advantage. The formation of a new government based upon the indisputable rights of the individuals of France through liberty and political uniformity.
A society that was built on equality was the main goal in an important political movement. The Enlightenment ideas and philosophers acted as the stepping stones for a new foundation to be constructed. The influenced third estate radically changed France by abolishing the old habits of the corrupt regime and replaced it with a new, sustainable one. The Enlightenment progressed the French Revolution by influencing the French Revolutionists and by creating important documents. The ideas of Locke and constitutionalism, Montesquieu and government change, Voltaire's ideas on equality, and Beccaria on unjust torture, all these ideas pushed the French Revolution forward. The people of France began to believe in this system of belief that would save their country from despair. This belief system resulted in them revolting and advocating for change. Abby Sieyes' document helped kick start the desire for rising up, and then followed the Tennis Court Oath and the Declarations of the Rights of Man which implemented the existence of the revolution. The ideas of these Enlightenment thinkers in the French Revolution is evident, and although the ideas of Rousseau influenced Robespierre to halt the revolution, the end of his reign of terror also disrupted the radicalism. Thus, it cannot be doubted that the ideologies of the Enlightenment period progressed the success of the revolution in
The French Revolution principles focused on three pillars: equality, liberty and fraternity. When the French people revolted against the old system, they yearned for having a completely different political system that looked after the interests and welfare of the French citizens (Ellis, Elisabeth Gaynor). Unlike under the feudal system, people demanded equality on the political, economic, and social levels. The principle of equality guaranteed that French citizens are equal before the law irrespective of their social, religious, or ethnical belonging (Markham, David J). Likewise, liberty was another principle of the Revolution. People than had the freedom to express themselves as they liked and they were free to practice whichever religion they embraced. Lastly, fraternity was the care of the Revolution; In order to insure freedom and equality, there should be some fraternity between all the components of the French society. Thus, leading to the question: to what extent did Napoleon’s domestic policies respond to these principles?
After years of distrust in the government and hatred towards the nobility, the French people rose up and started a revolution (The French Revolution). The Declaration of the Rights of Man, made in 1789, put the ideas of the French Revolution onto paper. They stated that all men are born equal and that they have the right to liberty and property, and security (Rogers, 2011). After the removal of the monarchy and the beheading of Louis XVI, the French entered the Reign of Terror. Being that there was no peace and the demands of the Declaration were still unmet, the French people at a very vulnerable state. Comtesse de Remusat proposed the very plausible theory that the French people only allowed Napoleon to rise to power because of their weakness. The idea of a republic caused fear in the people and they needed some sort of leader to take control and help France (Rogers, 2011). The sole reason for a revolution was to bring equality to all and the French still had not found that