Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Principles of scientific management theory
Principles of scientific management theory
Characteristic of scientific management approach
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Principles of scientific management theory
Frederick Taylor’s Principles of Scientific Management and the Multiple Frames for Viewing Work Organizations (graphics not included)
Dr. Frederick Winslow Taylor in a speech called "The Principles of Scientific
Management" delivered on March 3, 1915 to the Cleveland Advertising Club exhorts his
audience to take on a new, revolutionary view of the way work should get done. To combat
the time-ingrained attitude of workmen throughout the world that "it is in their best interest to
go slow instead of fast," Taylor proposes four principles of the scientific management of
work. He asserts that even though the average businessman believes that if workers were to
go fast, thus increasing efficiency resulting in a money saving decrease of workforce, just the
opposite would be true. Taylor believes increasing the efficiency of the workman
scientifically would increase the not only the opportunity for more work, but also the real
wealth of the world, happiness, and all manner of worthwhile improvements in the life of the
working person. For Taylor, increased workman output will result in improved quality of life.
Taylor, a mechanical engineer, seeks to apply a positivistic, rational perspective to the
inefficient work organization. A second "misfortune of industry" that impedes the progress of
improving work is what Taylor refers to as the "soldiering" of the worker, which essentially
means to make a show of work not necessarily doing one's best. The worker tries to balance
the inner conflict he feels as a result of worry about job security versus expectations of
productivity. Taylor says that the worker is not to blame for soldiering since, even if given
the opportunity to work harder with greater output, the effect on the labor market is such that
rate of pay is cut. What incentive does management have to pay a man more wages, even for
greater output, when another man will accept less for, albeit, less output. Taylor believes that
scientific management of work will alleviate the common work problems of inefficiency,
slow rate of work, and decreased productivity. Logically, according to Taylor’s view,
soldiering would disappear as workers’ productivity and security improved.
Figure One: Four Principles of Scientific Management
The above chart illustrates Taylor's four principles of scientific management. Taylor
is careful to assert that scientific management is no new set of theories that have been
untried, a common misunderstanding. He says that the process of scientific management has
been an evolution, and in each case the practice has preceded the theory. Further, scientific
management is in practice in various industries: "Almost every type of industry in this
In the essay “Work in an Industrial Society” by Erich Fromm, the author explains how work used to carry a profound satisfaction, however today workers only care about their payment for their labor. Fromm opens up with how craftsmanship was developed in the thirteenth and fourteenth century. It was not until the Middle ages, Renaissance and the eighteenth century, when craftsmanship was at its peak. According to C.W. Mills, workers were free to control his or her own working actions, learn from their work and develop their skills and capacities. Despite what Mills says, people today spend their best energy for seven to eight hours a day to produce “something”. Majority of the time, we do not see the final
Taylorism is a system that was designed in the late 19th century, not only to maximise managerial control, but to also expand the levels of efficiency throughout workplaces. With this being said, productivity levels increased and fair wage distribution was the main result. However, with other, more recent theories and systems, such as Maslow and Herzburg’s theories, these helped to focus on the satisfaction and motivation of the workers rather than the concern of managerial control and empowerment. Fredrick W. Taylor ended up developing 4 main principles to help increase the work efficiency and productivity in workplaces; these will be discussed later on. Other theories relating to this include, Fayol, Follett, Management Science Theory as well as Organisational-Environmental Theory. All theories listed have an influence on the way businesses work effectively and put their skills to action. This essay will highlight how Taylorism was designed to maximise managerial control and increase productivity, furthermore, showing how more recent theories were developed to focus on empowering employees and to extend the use of organisational resources.
DONKIN, R (2001) Blood, Sweat and Tears: The Evolution of Work London: Texere. (Ch. 11 – Western Electric Discovers Motivation).
Fordism and Scientific Management are terms used to describe management that had application to practical situations with extremely dramatic effects. Fordism takes its name from the mass production units of Henry Ford, and is identified by an involved technical division of labour within companies and their production units. Other characteristics of Fordism include strong hierarchical control, with workers in a production line often restricted to the one single task, usually specialised and unskilled. Scientific management, on the other hand, "originated" through Fredrick Winslow Taylor in 1911, and in very basic terms described the one best way work could be done and that the best way to improve output was to improve the techniques or methods used by the workers. (Robbins p.38)
According to Taylor (2007) his main objective when developing scientific management was to “maximise prosperity of the employer coupled with maximum prosperity for each of the employees.” In this regard, Taylor assumed that the interests of the management were similar to those of the workmen as each had something to gain fr...
Taylorism is a form of scientific management; it improves production efficiency by breaking down every job, action and task into smaller simpler segments as a way to improve efficiency, which could be easily taught to the workers in the organisation. The effect of Taylorism is aimed to maximise productivity, which relies on more efficient production methods to occur so that the organisation can reduce costs for production to allow for more profit. Initiated by Frederick Winslow Taylor in 1911, Taylorism was a theory-designed to improve efficiency of the production of goods. This method however involved using a divisional skill method, which put one worker on a single task, which was repeated through the day. This method however caused deskilling of workers because there was no skill aspect to working a repetitive action all day long. The use of taylorism allowed for control over the workers, which allowed for increased productivity. The focus of taylorism was to control and manipulate the decisions that were made by the workforce in order to increase the productive capacity of the organisation without having to increase the wages of the workers.
Scientifically select, train, and develop each employee rather than passively leaving them to train themselves.
One of the early contributors of management theory and known as “The Father of Scientific Management” was Frederick W. Taylor (1856-1915), a mechanical engineer who deemed work deserving of systematic observation and study.
Firstly, the passage states that companies will get/obtain more profits for employees who can work more effectively and make fewer mistakes, leading to increased profits for companies/enterprises. The plan allows employees to have fewer working hours is likely to hire more people to ensure that it meets normal levels of productivity.
The founding father of scientific management theory is Fredrick Winslow Taylor. He was an American mechanical engineer and an inventor. Modern management theorist Edward Deming credited Taylor for his contributions while Joseph Juran criticized his work for extracting more work from workers. However a careful reading of Taylor’s work will disclose that he placed workers interest as high as the employer’s in his studies. Before the principles of management are discussed it is very important to understand the causes which led Taylor to derive the four principles of management. The three causes are as follows:
Taylor’s scientific approach is based on the planning of work to achieve efficiency, standardization, specialization and simplification. Factories are managed through scientific methods and productivity is increase through a mutual trust between management and workers. Weber's bureaucratic approach embellishes the scientific management theory and focuses on dividing organizations into hierarchies, establishing strong lines of authority and control. Weber believed that organizations are accountable to and part of a broader the social order.
...in raising productivity in past 100 years has been based on Taylor’s theories (Drucker, 1999). Examples of use of Taylor’s theories include the Ford assembly line, Japanese ‘Quality Circle’ ‘Continuous improvement’ and ‘Just in Time delivery’ and Edward Demings ‘Total Quality Management’ theory (Drucker, 1999).
Taylor developed scientific management theory after observing organizational problems in his workplace, workers intentionally slacking, and adverse employer-employee relations (Taneja, Mildred, & Toombs, 2011). Through identifying the best equipment and people, then scrutinizing the production process Taylor was successful in improving production. Some of Taylor’s contributions include industrial efficiency and work measurement; standardization of tool, machines, motions, and tasks; task delineation and management; and organizational behavior.
Employees put in their efforts on the perception that their efforts will lead to performance and that effective performance will result in obtaining positive
...uate is fortified by an inclination of being let around the non-satisfaction of the hopeful estimates in the 1980s concerning the rise of more human-focused work environments in the post-Tayloristic time that might enhance the nature of working life for everyone (Piore and Sabel,1984). They bring up that the actuality for some employees, today, is a rebirth of Taylorism as neo-Taylorism or possibly disguised in the situation "lean-creation" or "flexible working" (Nyhan, et al., 2004). There is another critics said that the learning organization concept is already out of date and being replaced with theories of knowledge management (Brown and Keep, 2003).