Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Critical evaluation of the recruitment
Recruitment evaluation process
Critical evaluation of the recruitment
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Critical evaluation of the recruitment
Evaluation is a powerful approach for distinguishing programs and interventions that make a transformation from those that don't. It is a powerful force for evolving and adapting sound strategies, refining existing programs, and demonstrating the outcomes of investments in time and other resources. It also helps determine if what is being done is worth the money being spent.
The method of evaluation that could be performed of this recruitment program in my opinion would be a Summative Evaluation or it could possibly be a formative evaluation. A summative evaluation is an evaluation that offers data on a program’s efficiency and how well a program is working. A formative evaluation assesses a program during the progress stage in order to make
…show more content…
The important strategies that the department and the evaluators need to consider when working closely together would be how to properly and efficiently work together while also having good communication skills. Being able to have interpersonal skills would also be a good skill to consider having especially if you are going in front of people to talk and try to recruit them. There should be teamwork when planning ways to approach the audience that they are approaching. Having a strategy for what type of questions on a survey they will be handing out to the student and having a precise idea of what type of questions they would like to ask the college students. Being able to work in teams and work alongside one another should be the most important strategy out of any strategy they come up with. They should also have some type of expectations when going into this , and once its over see did their expectations come true or not. Expectations are the program's intended results. They describe what the program has to accomplish to be considered successful. For example, a program's vision, mission, goals, and objectives, all represent varying levels of specificity about a program's …show more content…
They also can take the amount of feedback that they receive from their social media accounts to verify if there has been a decline or rise in the number of new recruits they receive. Each goal can be assessed by carefully collecting data from each college and comparing them. Also, they can check to see if they have any new followers on their social media account or check to see how many new shares they get from posting on social media. The program should be described and documented clearly and accurately, so that what is being evaluated is clearly identified. Also they should gather the feedback needed to improve and be accountable for program effectiveness. Lastly improve communications among partners.
Some of the basic pieces of information the evaluators might need to know before starting the evaluation would be the type of audience they will be presenting to. Data from remarks or surveys in an assessment should be suitably and methodically studied so that evaluation questions are effectively answered. Also, they should set their goals and see if they are accomplished at the end of the
Evaluation can be crucial part of employee development, it let employee know where they are currently and where they can improve and it outlines what is expected. This can give a sense of purpose. Some of the cons are they that if they are not done appropriately or too generalized it can make the employee feel lost an unfulfilled. You can make it so the goals are basically unachievable giving a sense of powerlessness. I don’t believe this statement is completely true, I believe
If conducted well, the participant-oriented approach can offer the buy-in needed to remove the stigma of the evaluation process. Using this approach can provide stakeholders “with self knowledge and skills and an understanding of the power arrangements concerning their program and their locality” (Fitzpatrick et al., 2011, p.201). As stated by Cousins and Earl (1992) using key personnel capable of making decisions and who have a strong connection to the program can augment the usefulness and promote the actual use of the evaluation. It can also promote trust in the process and serve to remove any political stigma that may arise.
Organise dates and times with team meetings so standardisation actions can be considered. Ensuring assessors have experience and knowledge in the area of their subject. Information from the assessor as to what is to be monitored from which candidate and when. Therefore, Identifying the criteria that is to be assessed and IQA from the qualification using various methods e.g. Observations, written evidence, questioning, and R.P.L. Assessors will be observed with their decisions of the outcomes and sampled by the IQA. On an on-going basis, identifying as to what can be amended with constructive feedback. When completing in a summative stage, you would be checking the full assessment process with signatures and dates on all documents, maintaining accurate records throughout the IQA
Program evaluation is a skill that requires for skilled people to conduct an evaluation that is credible. My reason for taking this class was to gain the basic understanding of the program evaluation. As I became involved in the readings and class assignments I discovered a profound level of respect for this application. I uncovered that evaluations should dedicate thoughtfulness to all stakeholders who are invested in the program and affected by its evaluation. This process allows a full range of people and groups to take part in the evaluation; this is also a way to identify and develop the needs of stakeholders. Evaluation should be integrated throughout the preliminary phases of program development. A preliminary phase of the evaluation process is to define the program in-depth detail. This collective endeavor can generate a mutual understanding of the program and the evaluation process. In the environment in which I work this is an unknown process, program evaluation happens at the end of the year. In most cases, most programs are unsuccessful because of the fact of having unrealistic goals and outcomes. Evaluations can be formative and summative. Formative evaluations are conducted in the development and implementation phase of the program. This process can be beneficial because it provides with information on how to best attain the goals or make changes to the program. Summative evaluations happen when the programs are well instituted and inform on to what degree the program is attaining its outcomes and goals (Patton, 1987).
According to Smith and Larimer (2009), program evaluation is all about determining the value of a program or policy with respect to a given criteria; a systematic attempt to assess whether a program or policy is good or worthy. (Smith and Larimer:2009) The most common categorization of evaluation comes in pair: the formative and summative evaluation; and, the process and outcome evaluation. (Smith and Larimer:2009) The authors viewed formative and summative evaluation as something that could be distinguished by timing and by the intent of the individual conducting the study. Formative studies are undertaken in the early stages and are intended to inform the development of a program or policy, and essentially asks: ‘should we change anything that we are doing?’” (Smith and Larimer:2009) On the other hand, summative evaluations are done at a different part of a program or policy life cycle; the basic role of a summative evaluation is to decide whether to expand, contract, terminate, or
... weaknesses of the program and its effectiveness. The evaluation process should include: identifying clear goals of the program and developing a survey for each goal. These surveys can be executed at the first session of the program and again once it has ended. Comparing the pre-test and post-test info shall provide valuable info about changes in attitudes and behaviors.
Outcome based practice is a process that has a beneficial impact on the individual’s life. It can be an action taken or a service delivered. Outcome based approaches place the needs of the individual at the center of the service they receive.
b) program evaluation an can look at all characteristics of a program - activities, target groups, and outcomes.
The evaluators have the duty to keep stakeholders and constituents informed in a clear and transparent manner. In order to ensure these duties are effectively executed, the evaluators would espouse the U7, Timely and Appropriate Communication and Reporting, and U8, Concern for Consequences and Influence, standards. U7 indicates that stakeholders be kept aware of needed changes and given insight into the timeline, results, and recommendations of the evaluation process. U8 requires evaluators to consider potential influences of the evaluation results and the possible future consequences of the recommendations made (Yarbrough et al., 2011). Using these standards in the application of Appreciative Inquiry will allow evaluators to carefully and honestly assess, modify, and recommend appropriate changes to the program based on the information gathered (McNamara,
Success criteria How will I recognise success? How will I review and measure my improvement? Actions What methods will I use to achieve my learning objectives? Implementation
Outline a plan for monitoring and evaluation: Monitoring is achieved to determine if midcourse corrections are needed to ensure that marketing goals of the program will be reached. Evaluation refers to measurement and a final report on what has happened throughout the campaign.
Furthermore program evaluations also focus on program delivery, functions, inputs and outputs of a program.
When one thinks of the term assessment, they will most likely think of a test. This is what we know as summative assessment. Summative assessment can be defined as evaluation of student learning at the end of a unit (Formative vs. Summative).
Explain how one would be developed 1- An assessment will encourage community members to examine the community's assets and how to use them, as well as the community's needs and how to address them. 2- help to make decisions about priorities for program or system
There are several reasons organizations initiate performance evaluations, however the standard purpose for performance evaluations is to discuss performance expectations; not only from the employers perspective but to engage in a formal collaboration where the employee and the manager are both able to provide feedback in a formal discourse. There are many different processes an organization should follow when developing its performance evaluation tool; in addition essential characteristics that must accompany an effective performance appraisal process. I will discuss in detail the intent of a performance evaluation, the process an organization should follow in using its performance evaluation tool, along with the characteristics of an effective