Take A Stand Program

871 Words2 Pages

Process evaluations also examine to see if programs are implemented with fidelity. Programs need to be implemented the same way, every time in every place. So, every school implementing the Take a Stand program must implement it the same way. Programs must be accurately and consistently applied to be able to fully and properly compare results between participating schools. Programs also must be implemented with sufficient dosage. This means there must be sufficient programming to produce to expected effect. Process evaluations examine the implementation and dosage of programs to help determine why a program was or was not successful.
Furthermore program evaluations also focus on program delivery, functions, inputs and outputs of a program. …show more content…

Lastly, outputs must be identified. Inputs, the processes, and outputs all affect a program’s outcomes. Inputs are all of the resources and raw materials that go into a program. In this case inputs would include teachers, parents, administrators, and students. The process for a program is its activities, and procedures laid out by a program. So, in this case parents telling their children the school rules: 1) not to touch other children without their permission (“hands off” policy), 2) no name calling, and 3) treating others as you would want to be treated is one part of the process. Additionally, the teachers participating in role-playing exercises with students, showing videos and activities that increase empathy for bullied students and showing students ways to intervene in a bullying situation is another part of the process for this program. The last part of the process for the program is the administrator’s role in …show more content…

The 25 schools chosen to initially test the program were chosen for a specific reason. They were chosen because they are located in neighborhoods with high crime rates and high gang activity. The 25 schools were not chosen at random out of the 421 total Chicago Public Schools causing issues to internal validity. Also, it is never stated how the 5 schools were chosen for evaluation so selection bias may have occurred. The 5 schools could have the worst bullying rates, crime rates, or gang rates; it is unclear why these 5 schools were chosen. Schools with the worst bullying rates therefore could eventually have the greatest change occur. On the other hand schools that do not suffer from high rates of bullying could see no significant changes in the rates of bullying at their schools. Therefore not using random sampling greatly affects internal validity. This study also lacks a control group. A control group is essential to help reduce threats to validity. A control group and a treatment group should have been randomly assigned so each school had equal probability of being assigned to either group, to best control for threats to

Open Document