Many have heard of fine arts, but do they know what fine arts contain? Fine arts in
schools normally include paintings/sculptures, music, theater, and drawings.
People believe that fine arts is a beautiful aesthetic value of work. Some say that
this type of program benefits to teach different roles and skills to different kids. I
have recently learned that in some schools, fine arts might form to an end and
cancel out due to issues during school. Which I will talk about in this essay. (“10
Studies on the Importance of Art in Education.”)
Schools will have to eliminate the fine arts program in about 25% of schools. The
reason behind this solution was due to money issues. Most schools were having to
do this because they couldn’t afford extra funds.
…show more content…
They struggled to balance money out for both after and during school activities. However, some schools that were very talented with their kids but still couldn’t afford the funds that has to be given, still had to give up fine arts for the school.
(“Education and the Fine Arts.”)
A normal salary for fine arts programs would normally get paid around $300
billion as you reach adulthood. Which also all depends how good your art is and
how known you are. This pay might also go down annually. However due to
shutting down, fine art are given at limited schools. Before all of this began
happening, parents and other adults believed that fine arts should come to a stop.
This results from being a distraction from core classroom grades, after school
sports, and also other after school activities. In my perspective, it seems that some
people couldn’t afford or have time to donate to schools that had this program.
(“Less Art and Music Doesn't Mean Better Test Scores.”)
The reason why some schools are tossing the program so quick is due to the
government as well. In 2001, America decided to pass an act named the No Child
Left Behind Act. The No Child Left Behind Act was made to insure that each and
every student attending schools will have the same and equal amount of education.
They will also have high test scores. The main goal for the act was to proficiently
improve and increase on scores for exams. Many people complained
about academic grades, so resulting to that some schools canceled fine arts. ( “No Child Left Behind Act of 2001.”) A way to maintain fine arts in a school that still supported the program is to continue to have high test scores with students that are willing to donate money. You could also believe in the student involvement that are associate with core classes gains. However if you are a person where your school struggles with not having a program, you can begin to rise and increase test scores. At other solution is having some students go and work for donations and let those students take community service hours for it as well! In all, I think that fine arts seems like a cool and fun extra-curricular activity after school. I understand where both sides of the story is coming from, but I think fine arts matter and deserve to stay for all schools and students! (“Google Art Project and Digital Scholarship in the Visual Arts“)
The No Child Left Behind Act of 2001’s main purpose was to enhance the education system and hold schools accountable in its attempt to bring equality in the fight against poverty for poor and minority groups. Once this Act was signed into law the American public expected an overhaul of the education system with only good outcomes. The public assumed our children would be receiving the best education available and the economic issues that plagued schools would no longer be a problem. In the beginning of its implementation No Child Left Behind was expected to bring America up to standards with other nations, this was something that America has struggled to do for many years. Our children were now being put first according to Act and the public and many political figures were ecstatic over the possibilities.
The No Child Left Behind Act was put into place to help disadvantaged students, educators and the education system reach their full potential and succeed in life. This Act also drove student achievement to reach its highest and to hold both states and schools more accountable for each student’s progress. They represented significant changes to the education landscape at the time and helped shift the country’s focus on education (U.S. Department of Education, 2001).
Fine arts gives students a chance to pour their hearts into something beautiful; a chance to be a part of something that is bigger than just themselves. Some schools are facing financial troubles with the current economy, and one of the first programs they consider cutting is fine arts. The removal of fine arts programs would be absolutely devastating to countless members of the community. Many students would lose their favorite class, in some cases the one class that helps them get through the day, and many teachers that truly care fir the students would lose their dream jobs. Fine arts should not be cut from schools; they build confidence, help with the application of other academic concepts, and even help to prepare students for their future work in the business world.
Western culture had many important effects on the United States as a developing nation, and art education was no exception to this. In order to come to terms with the impact of Western culture on American art education, it is important to chronicle the progression of art education throughout Europe. Spanning centuries, the political, social, and economic development of European nations, each played an important role the philosophies of art education, which in the long run, affected American ideas concerning the subject.
No Child Left Behind (NCLB) is currently the educational policy in the United States. Prior to NCLB the educational policies in effect were “A Nation at Risk, in 1987 America 2000, and a few years later with Goals 2000” (Eisner, 2001, p.21). No Child Left Behind is a test based accountability system used in schools to measure their performance holding the districts, administrators and teachers liable and accountable for the outcomes. Supovitz (2009) States that No Child Left Behind was a major reform initiative intended to bring about widespread improvements in student performance and reduce inequities between ethnic groups and other traditionally under-served populations like economically disadvantaged students, students from major racial
The No Child Left Behind Act was passed in 2001. It was not written by teachers, educators, or parents, but by legislators who did not have experience in education. The act was written because the government felt that students were not proficient enough in basic skills, such as reading level, fundamental math skills, as well as other subjects. The writers believed that every person should have the same education, which would produce the same outcome in each child. NCLB changed school curriculums to focus on their standardized tests, which would ultimately evaluate how well the teachers, school districts, and students are performing. Arne Duncan, an American education administrator, believes that “…NCLB holds all students to the same, challenging standards…” is the best way to explain the program in an unbiased perspective. To put it more harshly, “No Child Left Behind is a test-and-punish scheme that fails to deal with real problems in schools,” says Michelle Rhee, a chancellor in Washington, D.C. “[It] ends up dumbing down educational quality.”
Much too often in America today, modern music and art programs in schools are perceived to many as extracurricular activities rather than important subjects that are vital to a students learning and skill development. The truth of the matter is that encouraging music and art education in public schools has a much larger impact on student’s grades, academic performance, and the economy than the majority people realize. Within the next year city school budgets will be dropping by twenty five percent, and despite the fact that music and art programs have been showing a dramatic contribution to student’s learning, this substantial drop in funding for the programs will lead to no dedicated money for art or music programs (Mezzacappa). There is no doubt that a cut in funding for art programs will take a huge toll on students overall grades and test scores. Research has found that the studying of music and art facilitates learning in other subjects and enhances children’s skills in other areas (Brown). Furthermore, providing students with a creative outlet can do great justice in reducing the stress from many other classes and even offer insight for students in possible career paths involving the art field. The art industry today currently supports 4.1 million full-time jobs (Dorfman). By increasing the funding of music and art programs for students preschool through twelfth grade we can see a dramatic increase in the education of children across the United States, assist with skill development in young students, and greatly benefit the economy at the same time.
Back in 8th grade, I was choosing my classes for high school. I was thrilled to see many fine arts classes, along with many different classes, because middle school only offers limited kinds of class. Since I already know I’m taking band in high school, I didn’t have to worry about fine arts credit but I chose to take art too, because I wanted learn more deeper about art. I saw many students like me taking both band and art, or enjoying art classes like I did. However, there were many students who did not enjoy it, or just taking it because they needed fine art credit in order to graduate. It remind me of myself taking language class just to get credit instead of interested in learning.
Students will have a safe place to express themselves, motivation to stay in school, and a higher test score. Fine arts are evidently needed; so now, what will people do to make sure that the arts have a permanent place in the schools? Will people realize the difference the arts make and change their ways, or will the voice of fine arts dwindle and die?
Just as other works that reflect art, pieces in the category of fine arts serve the important message of passing certain messages or portraying a special feeling towards a particular person, function or activity. At times due to the nature of a particular work, it can become so valuable that its viewers cannot place a price on it. It is not the nature or texture of an art that qualifies it, but the appreciation by those who look at it (Lewis & Lewis, 2008).
The Importance of Arts Education Jane Alexander, Chairman of the National Endowment for the Arts (NEA), once said, “Many children are missing out on something which gives their education context, gives their lives depth and meaning, and prepares them to be the future workforce.” This “something” that she spoke of is music and art education. Unfortunately, she is entirely correct. We are currently seeing a dramatic cut in arts education curriculum in our public schools due to the limited amount of time and funding. In many cases, budget cutbacks mean arts education cutbacks.
Art is everywhere , every tv show, every ad , and every book is art. That is why it is a vital part in today 's education system, but in the rush to bring ip standardized test scores art programs are being dramatically cut and forgotten about altogether. With the new focus being on Common Core State Standards, which does not include art as a core, schools are having to take away art budgets to focus on cores that are being tested on.
...em to find other ways of expressing their thoughts. Arts classes are important and should be an essential in our society. Being artistic and creative can help students be who they are and stand out. It can help them use their knowledge and come up with extraordinary ideas to make big changes in the world, and it can also keep students away from bad things and be better human beings by doing what they are interested in.
In fact because of schools focus more on academics and athletics and that art programs are not their main focus. By this it is showing that the art inclined students are not their main focus, but would rather focus on the other students that would show that they are better than other schools in the area. Because of the school focusing on the students that are better at academics and athletics, it makes the art inclined students feel like they are not one wanted or are they should be better at academics and athletics just like everyone else at the school. It also makes them feel like they can't be a part of the school and make it better for everyone. With only one art teacher in my high school, only a few students could get into the art classes. This made it very hard for the students who really wanted to be in the classes and having to choose classes that they did not want and not able to express their creativity.
Creative minds come together and form this in so many ways. It expresses one’s self and opens up a world of individuality. This world would mean nothing without the existence of art. The human body itself has been labeled a master piece. You can’t say it only has to do with painting, sculpting and drawing. Singing, dancing, writing (poetry and books), architecture, fashion and etc. falls in this category.