Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
The influence of the internet on students'academic
The influence of the internet towards academic performance
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: The influence of the internet on students'academic
Web filters are a problem to everyone in school, teachers and also students.“The Internet, despite having great potential, is not being used to its full potential. It is a great research tool that is being limited by the school’s overly restrictive filter,” said Patrick Cloonan. Web filters at schools are way too restrictive because teachers have stated that these restrictions have been a barrier of conducting a proper lesson to students because certain websites will not allow teachers to present what is needed. Students that have internet connections at home have exposure, but those students who rely on Internet access at school are not getting access to the same sites that should be accessed. Another concern with internet filters is that …show more content…
An article written by MindShift titled “What’s the Impact of Overzealous Internet Filtering in Schools?” Quotes a statement from Kristen Batch saying “The over-filtering that occurs today affects not only what teachers can teach but also how they teach. It creates barriers to learning and acquiring digital literacy skills that are vital for college and career readiness, as well as for full participation in 21st-century society.” This supports the idea of over restrictive web filters, not only do they decrease ways of learning but they are seen as a “barrier”. Some may feel that these should not be referred to as restrictions, but something a bit more broad such as censorship. Reasons and point of views such as these explain why many may see restrictions as way too restrictive of what students and teachers can access to increase their learning …show more content…
“Top 3 Benefits of Monitoring & Filtering Web Traffic for Schools” written by Team Gwava states one of the mentioned benefits are that these filters retain control of student access. This suggest that because of these restrictions, students may be held back from visiting websites or any internet feature the schools believes is not essential for school. This statement is blind to the fact that a large portion of the kids in school have cell phones that allows them to access any website wanted or needed and even though some of these cell phones may be off, there are apps out in stores such as Open Door that acts as a hack for students and lets them venture through any website wanted while on school wifi. Therefore, while schools are coming up with blocks the kids find ways to work around
The type of content usually censored is sexual or violent things but Ballaro states, “Some bans (and the filtering software used to enforce them) eliminated access not only to pornographic materials but also to legitimate health and medical information” (Ballaro 1). If someone were to become sick, looking up symptoms on the internet is not the most efficient way to go about finding out what sickness they have, or what kind of treatments there are. Going to a professional would ensure that they get the correct diagnosis and treatment. Everything on the internet can be changed and not knowing the accuracy of a source is going to make the search more or less accurate. Children are also a big part of why things are censored. In the same passage, it is explained,“Opponents of Internet Censorship argue that education, not censorship, represents the best means of protecting children…” (Ballaro 1). Telling someone not to do something will just make them want to do it more. Educating kids on the dangers of the internet will not stop them from going on the internet. Protection children from all scammers and hackers, not just to mention explicit material, would also be challenging considering the internet is changing rapidly each day. Why not just block websites that are bad so even if children are tempted, they can not go to
Objectionable content found in challenged books across the country can range from some vulgar language, to rape and incest, and even to explicit sex scenes. However objectionable these topics may be, high schoolers are already exposed to them in some way, whether it be through listening to popular music on the radio, watching television, or browsing the internet. Many parents, and even board members of some schools, object certain books for a variety of reasons. What they have failed to realize is this: if they are so concerned about what their children read in school, are they as concerned about monitoring what they hear on the radio, see on television, and search online? Many schools across the country are now taking the technological route when it comes to teaching. This often means students can have access to the internet while in their classroom. This point goes back to the prior statement of ...
...Kids Points of View: Internet Censorship." 2011. Points of View Reference Center. Web. 21 March 2012.
According to “Freedom of Speech” by Gerald Leinwand, Abraham Lincoln once asked, “Must a government, of necessity, be too strong for the liberties of its people, or too weak to maintain its own existence (7)?” This question is particularly appropriate when considering what is perhaps the most sacred of all our Constitutionally guaranteed rights, freedom of expression. Lincoln knew well the potential dangers of expression, having steered the Union through the bitterly divisive Civil War, but he held the Constitution dear enough to protect its promises whenever possible (8).
The first benefit that would result from censoring the internet would be the protection of the mind. When children are doing homework online, they frequently get distracted by the presence of other websites. This often interferes with their progress. In cases of teenagers, the websites they are commonly sidetracked by are pornography websites. Pornography has negative effects on the brain because it makes people lose their innocence and promotes v...
Gottschalk, Lana. “Internet filters in public libraries: do they belong?” Library Student Journal 2006: vol. 1. Accessed 31 March 2008. http://www.librarystudentjournal.org/index.php/lsj/article/view/25/18
Censorship is “the restriction or removal of information, or the prevention of free expression” (Taylor 8). There are many things that can be censored such as books, movies, TV shows, newspapers, and the way people dress. People censor things for a number of reasons- they do not agree with it, find it offensive, or think that it is just inappropriate in general. Different people consider different things inappropriate, so the content of what is censored varies. Anyone can censor, including parents, teachers, school officials, and board members (Taylor 8-10) Many things are censored in schools and places where children are present because parents do not want their kids to be exposed to inappropriate content (Taylor 10). Students are entitled to their First Amendment rights just as much as adults are, but schools still censor things like newspapers, books, and clothing.
Censorship in Schools There has recently been a renewed interest and passion in the issue of censorship. In the realm of the censorship of books in schools alone, several hundred cases have surfaced each year for nearly the past decade. Controversies over which books to include in the high school English curriculum present a clash of values between teachers, school systems, and parents over what is appropriate for and meaningful to students. It is important to strike a balance between English that is meaningful to students by relating to their lives and representing diversity and satisfying worries about the appropriateness of what is read.
I don't think that web filters are too restrictive, but they don't block the right things. One example is my school's web filters blockage of coolmath.com, a math learning website because one part the site includes an active chatroom. The web filter doesn't block a gaming website known as Friv. I believe that a teacher should have access to the web filter so a student can go to them and ask for permission to go to a site that's relevant to what they are studying in class but would be blocked universally on the school network. This should also work so if a student is on a gaming site the teacher can block it right away and bring the student back on topic. The teacher should then be able to let the school know about it so they can universally
The internet is a wonderful learning tool. Of course, like any good thing, the Internet comes with its ups and downs. There are several things that aren’t suitable for any child on the internet, such as pornography, violent material, adult chat rooms, and racist or hateful sites, there are even websites about cheating in schools.
Clemmitt illustrates that “data released in the spring of 2011 as part of the ongoing Speak Up research by Project Tomorrow found that restrictive Internet filtering was the top student complaint about Web use in 2010, “ and goes on to say, “Five years earlier, the chief complaint was connectivity speed.” Our students today are so wired, we will soon find that our assets for technological advice and assistance sit at the desks inside of our classrooms. By incorporating technology into education, the students further familiarize themselves with the way different technologies work, and better yet, the ways to fix it. Youth are very keen at pointing these things out, and exposing them to this technology during education will make them better technological problem solvers in
...deo sites among others. This is a benefit many schools are not able to provide. Last year we would often peak at 70% usage. Going into this school year, it was known that we may “run out” of available bandwidth with the addition of the student laptops. Personal Relationships were blocked (myspace/facebook types of sites) as their role was deemed significantly more personal than work/school related. During peak use periods and during a time while many abusers were online attempting to watch movies, television shows and other non-school sites blocking became very restrictive in order to stabilize our connection. Most schools block all multimedia websites such as You Tube as a means to manage bandwidth. I honestly hope we don’t have to institute that level of blocking again, but it is certainly a possibility, especially if abuse or overuse becomes apparent once again.
New websites are created and updated. Because of the changes in the internet, this makes filtering ineffective. The internet filter proposed by the government only has 3205 websites blocked, in its blacklist. This will not protect children because new websites go up all the time. Also, a huge amount of human labour is needed to maintain an internet filter.
“How internet filtering is hurting Kids†is an article that helps support this idea. In this article it says how in the past couple of years they have pivoted to a connectivity gap. This hurts them because it hurts schools that do not have high-speed internet connected. To try to fix this problem Obama, in 2013 launched connected initiative to try and connect 99% of schools to broadband internet. In despite of all of this, internet policies still continue to deprive children from being digital consumers. Therefore this is the topic that most students have a disadvantage in this.Which means when they try to apply for a job in the future and it has technology included they will not be able to
19). Thinking about this, schools could have had a negative connotation about using the Internet because certain funding associations would not help them; this could lead the school into thinking that the Internet needed to be protected in the first place. Nick Morrison in It’s Time To Rethink Our Use Of Technology In Schools, writes about Bob Harrison, a chairman on U.K’s Department for Education who thinks that technology should be thought about before put in a classroom. Harrison believes that, “…too much of the technology that is used in classrooms actually reinforces traditional teaching methods” (Forbes, 2014). There is a definite purpose of a classroom; creatively teaching the curriculum a teacher is given. A traditional teaching style consists of a teacher in front of the classroom, students sitting and learning, and no change in how the classroom is managed. There tends to be no creativity as well as uninterested students. Harrison has a very different definition of ‘learning’; “Learning is not about content, it is about