Field Reflection Paper

1407 Words3 Pages

Based off of the data I have collected from my field notes one and two I will be comparing and contrasting aspects from both pieces such as social business and rich points. These aspects are identified by analyzing the conversation itself, which includes influences such as gender, power, and group identity. These instances in which I observed can help to provide an understanding of much larger issues of power, identity, and value in the world we live in today.
The setting for both of my field notes took place in a dorm of the Indiana University campus. I chose to record and transcribe the conversations between my friends and I while hanging out and studying in a dorm room. The first conversation was between my friends Natalie, Bailey, Jake, Aaron, and I. The recording took place in Jake and Aaron’s dorm room on the fifth floor of Teter. We have all been good friends since high school besides Jake. He is not from the same high school as the four of us and was the newcomer in this group. I thought that this would be an interesting conversation to record because of the presence of both guys and girls and a …show more content…

This difference, however, led to many interesting questions and observations that arose from examining the two different transcriptions and the power, identity, and value these interactions represented. In addition, the communication between the participants in both field notes often was analyzed using the readings and theoretical arguments presented from the book A Cultural Approach to Interpersonal Communication edited by Leila Monaghan, Jane E. Goodman, and Jennifer Meta Robinson. While some of these aspects of communication found within the transcriptions fall in line with the arguments presented within the various readings, some of the aspects and evidence found do not follow the characteristics of the explained communication

More about Field Reflection Paper

Open Document