Fast Food Rhetorical Analysis

1049 Words3 Pages

David Zinczenko argues Fast Food companies should give the nutritional and proper ingredient of their food. because Fast food companies, they 're miss information of their product, most fast food chains miscalculate their nutrition information. Tobacco companies label their product, even give out warning label that 's explains what will happen if consumers keep inhaling their product. But why not fast food restaurants, why not their food. Even fast-food restaurants do not even label prepare food. No nutritional information or what 's actually in their food that 's make consumers want to keep coming back, repeatedly. It could be the influences of the commercial or what’s in the food itself, even financials is part of the consumers buying these …show more content…

Yes, you can argue that point, but David Zinczenko does not blame the people or the companies. He only argues that companies should provide the nutrition label and warning sign to their product. In the “Don’t Blame the Eater” there’s an examples explaining about one of these restaurants food and their miscalculation on that food. McDonald chicken salad and their dressing comes to a total of 620 calories. But Zinczenko found that information to be miscalculated on their part. In the article, David said “Read the small print on the back of the dressing packet and you’ll realize it actually contains 2.5 servings. If you pour what you’ve been served, you’re suddenly up around 1,040 calories, which is half of the government’s recommended daily calorie intake” (Graff and Birkenstein 243). Another examples are that most of these fast-food companies do not even label the nutrition facts of prepare foods. In the “Don’t Blame the Eater” article states that the Food and Drug Administration does not cover the prepare foods labels. Even for some fast food purveyors will provide the calorie information on request from the Administration. But, with most fast food companies their labeling system is very hard to understand the facts on what they digest. Back to the examples of the salad, the calories the restaurant gave was 620 calories total, but on the small print from the actually food it was a …show more content…

Instead of adverting on their new product how about share the nutrition labels of their most popular food. Now again, people do have the self-control of picking what they eat. But, it’s not entirely their fault, they don’t know what they’re getting or putting in their bodies. It’s less than likely to be addicted to fast-food products, which you can but it’s a likely chance. People should watch what they eat, but fast food companies should provide these nutritious facts and warning sign for their food. It is hard to control your hunger when it comes to these advertisements and where you live, maybe when you’re around those restaurants it could be hard to control yourself. Either way, “Don’t Blame the Eater” article is David Zinczenko opinion on the fast food industries, believe him or

Open Document