Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Questions on personality in organisational behaviour
Conclusion on communication styles
Conclusion on communication styles
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Questions on personality in organisational behaviour
Every workplace across the world is composed of multiple personality types. Although these personalities may clash at times, each individual brings a unique set of strengths and weaknesses to the organization. An individual must acknowledge and seek to gain greater understanding regarding his personality type in order to understand his role within the organization. Additionally, understanding other personality types may help avoid or diffuse conflicts within the workplace. Leadership within an organization ought to respect varying personality types and recognize the potential and value within each individual employee. The acknowledgement and understanding of the sixteen personality types leads to efficiency, respect, and ultimately success …show more content…
The opposite of extraverting is “introverting”, or when we are “inside of our own minds”. Although every individual has extraverting and introverting moments throughout the day, the personality typing is based upon the individual’s life direction. Some individuals receive energy from the outside world, while others are motivated from within (The Four Preferences, 2015). According to the Jung Typology test, I have a moderate tendency to prefer extraversion over introversion (31%) (Jung Typology Test, 2016). As a registered nurse, a tendency toward extraversion allows me to pour into my patients. Although my full time occupation is a registered nurse, I also work as a nursing supervisor and shift manager in the Emergency Department, allowing me to exercise my leadership skills. However, a tendency toward extraversion over introversion may result in poor listening skills, an essential quality in leadership and the nursing profession. Extroverted individuals often lack the ability to receive feedback from inferiors and often strive to have the last word in an argument. S- …show more content…
According to Kroeger, Thuesen, and Rutledge, name-calling and labeling is inevitable in the workplace (2002). The term “typewatching” refers to skillful, objective, and constructive labeling of coworkers. Typewatching is essential in the building and the maintenance of teamwork in the workplace (Kroeger, Thuesen, & Rutledge, 2002). The key to success in the workplace is to acknowledge and respect the different personality types. As a leader, it is essential that each individual be encouraged to capitalize on his or her own personal strengths. Although conflict is bound to arise when differing personalities are blended, each individual ought to be treated with respect across all levels of an
Patrick henry is considered a rationalist, he wrote and took part in “give me liberty, or give me death” on march 23, 1775. In this work, we can see evidence of the characteristics, themes and style identified with the rationalist movement which was extant in American letters between 1750 and 1800. Patrick henry wrote during this time period of American literature, and as such, remains one of the most identifiable and iconic writers of his time.
Extraverts are people who are relatively sociable and outgoing while on the opposite end individuals who are introverts are people who would much rather enjoy the company of close friends and family. People who are high in agreeableness are more likely to be trustworthy. Those who are high in conscientiousness are goal-oriented. Individuals high in neuroticism
The bases of this paper will be based on the results that I had obtained when I took the Myers-Briggs personality test. The results that I had obtained was that I was determined to be an ENFJ. I will go into depth about letter and how each represents that a specific aspect of my personality. The results that I had received were not what I had expected, but the more I read about the trait the more I realized how it suited me. I will also talk about the information that I had found useful from the book, Type Talk at Work: How the 16 Personalities Types Determine Your Success on the Job by Otto Kroeger, which gave me insight on how to interact with other personality types especially in the work environment. The information that I absorbed from the personality test and from the book will go into use in my personal and work life so that both environments will be cohesive and peaceful.
Extraversion is marked by pronounced engagement with the external world. Extraverts enjoy eing with people, are full of energy, and often experience positive emotions. They tend to be enthusiastic, action-oriented, individuals who are likely to say "Yes!" or "Let's go!" to opportunities for excitement. In groups they like to talk, assert themselves, and draw attention to themselves. (Beaumont 2003)
Extraverts have an energy that is outwards towards people and things (Changing Minds, 2002-2011). They get their motivation from others, need a lot of stimulation, and express their motions (Changing Minds, 2002-2011). Rather than thinking of changing the world they want to change it (Changing Minds, 2002-2011). They have an attitude that is often relaxed and confident and they are understandable and accessible (Changing Minds, 2002-2011). Before thinking they act and like to communicate openly (Changing Minds, 2002-2011). They show energy and enthusiasm (Changing Minds, 2002-2011). They are often seen as shallow and pushy by introverts (Changing Minds, 2002-2011). After reading the first scenario of Joh...
My score on extraversion was 22, low again compared to the norm. For this trait, I agreed with my results at first, but after some thinking I realized although I am introverted, I do behave extravertly sometimes. In general, I prefer working alone, staying indoors, and I don’t like being around a lot of people. For example, when given a group project, I’d prefer working on my own. Yet most of the time, I end up being the group leader because I get along well with people and am usually optimistic. Basically, I prefer settings with less people, but I can mingle well with strangers at parties or functions. Most of my friends and myself included, would say I am extraverted because I make friends easily and am usually very happy and cheerful. But that is only partially true because I do behave differently depending on the situation and my role as a friend, student, employee, etc. Therefore, I don’t agree with my results overall. Considering I show both introversion and extroversion, I think my results should have been within average compared to the
Leadership is the glue that binds any business together, identifying and understanding your type of leadership style can ultimately aid you in becoming a better leader in your professional career. A successful business cannot function without leadership therefore this is a crucial aspect of internal employee development for businesses striving to stay relevant in a crowded marketplace. In addition to recognizing your leadership style every leader needs to look to them and identify what type of personality they have. By becoming an informed business leader you will gain trust and respect of your team to guide them into the future and maximizing potential growth. Throughout this paper I will identify my leadership style and also personality type and how it has affected my personal career growth. Identifying these conclusions is extremely important in crafting company culture.
There has yet to be any determining evidence defines the characteristics of extraversion. The experimenters in this particular experiment have hypothesized that the facets of extraversion are somehow linked by reward sensitivity. This hypothesis was also tested against a model in which they are linked by sociability. There has been much work on this topic in the past, beginning with the works of Jung and James in the early 20th century—to the work of Watson and Clark in 1997. And even after a century of study, they are still unable to truly define the characteristics of the extraversion dimension of personality. In the many attempts to define extraversion, Watson and Clark have defined six basic facets of the personality trait. These are: venturesome, affiliation, positive affectivity, energy, ascendance, and ambition. Researchers Depue and Collins, in 1999, also offered a more succinct depiction of the characteristics of extraversion, this only having three basic parts. The first being affiliation, the enjoyment and value of close interpersonal bonds, also being warm and affectionate. The second, agency, being socially dominant, enjoying leadership roles, being assertive and exhibitionistic, and having a sense of potency in accomplishing goals. The final facet being impuslivity, but this one has been argued upon whether it should be included at all in the characteristics of extraversion at all.
In terms of The Big Five Trait Theory, an individual with a high level of extraversion is thought to display dominant behaviour as well as good leadership skills. The individual focusses their psychic energy on things that are external...
“We desperately need both introverts and extroverts within our organizations. It’s a matter of survival, not just success. Mankind would be extinct without such diverse personalities,” (Whitford, 2010). The world simply would not function completely full of extroverts: loud people who enjoy parties, the company of other people, have a need for excitement and usually have optimistic and impulsive personalities. The world would not be enough for seven billion extroverts. However, on the other hand, a world filled with quiet, shy, introspective people would not function either. As Dr. Little said, our diverse personalities are what keeps mankind going. The old adage that opposites attract seems to be true when you look at the world as a whole. The loud man searches for a quiet woman, the shy man looks for a confident woman, etc., etc. Everyone in the world is looking for the differences in others that complete themselves, and those differences are what makes the world work, what makes the world unique. Some of those basic differences will be discussed in the rest of this paper.
When discussing extraversion-introversion, there does not seem to be a plethora of similarities simply because the two are on opposite ends of the continuum (Peake, 2014, p. 8). Differences on the other hand are identified much easier between the two. One main difference is the way individuals perceive each trait. Extraversion is seen as a good quality and is often used as a positive trait. Although it is not entirely true, introversion is looked at as a negative trait for someone to possess in today’s’ society (Peake, 2014, p. 8). The best way to explain how these two traits differ would be the type of stimuli that motivates
“The main problem”, so Cain, “is the design of our institutions such as school-systems or workplaces, for instance. They are designed mostly for extroverts. Especially nowadays, when group-working assignments have become more and more important, introvert kids or colleagues are seen as problem-cases in class. Although introverted persons in leadership positions often deliver better outcomes than extroverts.”
Introverts tend to be more quiet and reserved and prefer interaction only with close friends. On the
What does it mean to be introverted versus extraverted and why does it dictate how an individual perceives the world? Why does popular culture suggest there are an abundance of extraverted individuals living amongst the population? Laurie Helgoe, a psychologist with a Ph. D in psychodynamic psychotherapy and author of Revenge of the Introvert, an article which troves through different aspects of introversion and how they may manipulate the life of a given introverted individual. The introvert is an interesting person, they are one that prefers to stay within themselves and don’t need external stimulation to get they’re brain juices flowing.
As a type A personality I am always on the go, seeking efficiencies in nearly every task, if not attempting to do multiple tasks at once (Robbins & Judge, 2009, p. 114). With high job motivation, I am at the top of my organization able to influence and control the planning and execution of daily events (Robbins & Judge, 2009, p. 220). I am