Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Theories of motivation their implications
Theories of motivation their implications
Role and theories of motivation
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Theories of motivation their implications
Motivation is an internal force that determines the level, direction and persistence of effort expended in an organisational environment (Dinibutun, 2012). There are many theories that aim to help explain certain behaviour at certain times. Process theories of motivation, such as Vrooms expectancy theory model, examine the cognitive process which affects decisions when it comes to alternative actions at work (Dinibutun, 2012). This essay aims to review the literature on Vrooms expectancy theory of motivation, analyse a real life work example and apply the theory and finally provide recommendations for improvement and self-development.
Literature review:
One of the many important facets of managing people within an organisational setting is motivating high levels of performance. Although a plethora of theories of motivation has been developed to offer managers the ability to improve performance and motivation of their subordinates, only few have surpassed rigorous tests of credibility of application in the workplace (Dodge & Ramsey, 1981). Vrooms expectancy theory of motivation is one such example which aims to emphasise the importance of motivation in the reasoning behind why people select particular actions or behaviours (Lee, 2007).
Over decades of empirical studies, Expectancy Theory has evolved as a basic paradigm for the study of attitudes and behaviours of humans within work and organisational environments (Lawler & Suttle, 1973). However, it is Vrooms expectancy theory of motivation that represents the first attempts to use cognitively-orientated assumptions as the basis for a general theory of work motivation (Lawler & Suttle, 1973). Although Expectancy theory doesn’t attempt to explain what motivates individuals, it focu...
... middle of paper ...
...cognitive variable within the theory is performance to outcome expectancy, also referred to as instrumentality, which is the perception or belief that meeting performance expectations will result in the attainment of valences or reward (Scholl, 2002).
Works Cited
Dinibutun, R. (2012). Work Motivation: Theoretical Framework. GSTF Business Review (GBR), 1(4), 133-139. doi:10.5176/2010-4804_1.4.138
Dodge, D., & Ramsey, J. (1981). Employee motivation: Expectancy Theory at Work. Journal of Library Administration, 1(3), 43-54. doi:10.1300/J111V01N03_05
Lawler, E., & Suttle, L. (1973). Expextancy theory and job behavior. Organizational Behavior and Human Performance, 9(3), 482 - 503. doi:10.1016/0030-5073(73)90066-4
Lee, S. (2007). Vroom’s expectancy theory and the public library customer motivation model. Library Review, 56(9), 788 - 796. doi:10.1108/00242530710831239
The Expectancy Violations Theory originated by Judee Burgoon explains a person’s response to unpredicted actions by their peers, and the numerous meanings that individuals attribute to the abuse or violation of their personal space. Burgoon defined personal space as the “invisible, variable volume of space surrounding an individual that defines that individual’s preferred distance from others” (Griffin, p. 85). Expectancy is what people predict (or expect) will occur, instead of what they wish.
Motivation play an important role in today’s work environment as motivated employees are more productive employees. However, the ways how we motivate the employees have to be improved from time to time as employees are being more demanding and that they are more concern about their needs than before. Motivational strategies have probably affected the most by employee concerns and values (Greiner 1986, p. 82). ‘A motivational strategy is any effort to induce employees to initiate and sustain activities that can directly or indirectly improve service productivity’ (Greiner 1986, p. 82). Motivation can have an effect on the output of your business and concerns both quantity and quality. For example, if you are in a manufacturing company, your business actually relies heavily on your production staff to make sure that quality product are being produce and being delivered to your client at the right time. However, if your production employees are lack of motivation they will be not motivated to produce the amount of product demanded, thus will be very costly. In the essay below, we will be discussing on the strength and weaknesses of McClelland’s acquired needs theory and the expectancy theory.
One of the most important theories of HRM (Human Resource Management is that of ‘Motivation’. The purpose of this theory is to explain the role of an organisation in order to encourage its people to put in the best of their efforts and abilities in a way that will help further in achieving better outcomes for the business and organisation’s goals(Armstrong, 2001). There are various techniques that can be adopted to motivate people for instance, rewards, punishments, actions to satisfy needs, psychological processes etc. This world is developing at a rapid pace and due to this development and quick changes; new ways of working and managing organisations have emerged. These
Steers, T. M., Mowday, R. T., & Shapiro, D. L. (2004). Introduction to Special Topic Forum: The Future of Work Motivation Theory. The Academy of Management Review, 29 (3), 379-387.
Latham G.P and Pinder C.C. (2005). Work Motivation Theory and Research at the Dawn of the Twenty-First Century. Annual Review of Psychology 56.
Yet, despite the criticism, Herzberg’s theory still holds merit in many managerial situations. Experts have built their theories on the foundations of the motivator-hygiene theory to better explain worker motivation. Among the most prominent is the expectancy theory or Victor
Robbins and Judge define motivation by means of three elements. The first element is defined as being the process that account for an individual’s intensity which is concerned with how hard a person tries. The second element is direction that benefits the organization and the third element is persistence which is a measure of how long a person can maintain effort. Motivation is also driven by certain situations that vary between individuals and within individuals, at different times. (Robbins & Judge, 2007, p.186) These elements should not only be expected from employees but from managers as well.
Research has shown that motivation in an employee is an important factor which determines his performance. Motivation is the “driving force within individuals” (Mullins, 2007, p. 285). It is the concerned with finding out the reasons which shape and direct the behaviour of the individuals. The people act to achieve something so that they can satisfy some needs (Gitman and Daniel, 2008). It is important for the manager to understand this motivation of individual employees in order to inspire them and devise an appropriate set of incentives and rewards which would satisfy the needs that they have individually (Kerr, 2003). Once these needs are expected to be met in return for some specific behaviour or action, they would work more diligently to have that behaviour in them and to achieve that objective (Meyer and Hersovitch, 2001). Since it would lead to early and fuller achievement of the company objectives as the individual would work more diligently, it would lead to better organizational performance (Wiley, 1997).
Motivation is key in the workplace. It is developed from the collaboration of both conscious and unconscious principles such as the strength of desire or need, motivating force or reward estimation of the objective, and desires of the person and of his or her peers/co-workers. These elements are the reasons one has for carrying on a specific way. An illustration is an understudy that invests additional energy contemplating for a test since he or she needs a superior review in the class. The Inside and outside principles that animate want and vitality in individuals to be constantly intrigued and centered around their work, part or subject, or to try to achieve an objective.
Kovach KA (1987). What motivates employees? Workers and supervisors give different answers. Business Horizons, 30. 58-65. Print. 8 Feb. 2014.
There is no shortage of motivational theories, just as there is none for leadership theories; however there are a few particularly important ones. It is interesting to note that even some of the most notable ideas of motivation are nothing more than untested hypotheses with simple anecdotal observations as a backbone that has served for years of...
First expectation is to appear in class. Students need to attend everyday/week except if you have a reason such as you are feeling poorly or if something unpredictable were to happen, etc. Although when it comes to being in a big classroom like in college, professors do not interface with their students and presence may not be as noticeable as it was in a small classroom in secondary school unless you sit in the front. However, high school teachers appear to be harsher, impolite, and have numerous regulations for the students to obey. For those students who did not obey the rules teachers would discipline them.
When it is discovered that a worker can fulfill the requirements of their job, but are experiencing shortcomings in doing so, many times it is believed that worker motivation may be the root of the problem (Laird 95). What, though, is work motivation? According to Laird (2006), “motivation is a fundamental component of performance “ and “is the reason that someone chooses to do some things and chooses not to do others”. In other words, work motivation is what energizes workers to the level of output required to fulfill a task, directs their energy towards the objectives that they need to accomplish, and sustains that level of effort over a period of time (Steers et al., 2004). In essence, worker motivation is what gets the job done. Employee motivation has always been a central problem in the workplace, and, as an individual in a supervisory position, it becomes ones duty to understand and institute systems that ensure the proper motivation of your subordinates. Proper motivation of employees can ensure high productivity and successful workflow, while low worker motivation can result in absenteeism, decreased productivity rates, and turnover. A large body of research has been produced regarding motivation, and much of this research is applicable to the workplace. Due to the nature of man, motivation varies from individual to individual, and, because of this, there is no one system that is the best for ensuring worker motivation in every organizational situation, and, as a product, many theories have been created to outline what drives people to satisfactorily complete their work tasks. Throughout the course of this document, the three main types of these motivational theories will be outlined and examples of each as well...
Motivation is an important function in organizations to motivate their employees for their ability to perform well, improving their skills, increasing productivity, job satisfaction and employee extension. Employees also are not a machines that we could just program their task in their brain and they will do it automatically, they require motivation to actually do their job properly. And so, after discussing the process models of the Maslow’s “Hierarchy of needs”, Douglas McGregor theory X and Y, and also the Herzberg’s “two factor motivation hygiene theory.” understanding the ways of motivating people, the human nature, and the substance of nature. I believe that the true motivation can only come from within and also managers can actually motivate all of their employees.
Motivation is not only the outcome of single or few factors; rather it is the result of the interaction of both unconscious and conscious types of factor lying deep inside of an individual ("What is the motivation? Definition and meaning"). The interaction between these factors motivates or de-motivates an individual to a greater extent. To take an example, these factors can be the dedication or the commitment that an individual have towards the goal attainment, the level to which an individual values the reward, and the level to which an individual perceives that he or she is treated equally as with his or her peers. Out of all, this paper talks about the expectation factor that an individual has in his or her mind which motivates or