Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Importance of safety rules Essay
Importance of safety rules in the laboratory
Importance of safety rules in the laboratory
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Importance of safety rules Essay
When I first arrived at Exit Strategy I wasn’t sure what to expect because I had never participated in this type of group activity. The group tour guide was very entertaining and made the experience even more fun. At the start we filled out our waiver forms and went to a room where the tour guide explained all of the rules of the game and safety tips. Our assignment was called “Lost in Space” and there were five Wake Forest group members participating. The hallways of the building were very narrow with dim lighting. After listening to the rules, we exited the room and headed over to the spacecraft where the assignment would take place. This indoor simulator was designed to mirror a real vehicle or machine that could fly in outer space. Once on board the …show more content…
I observed that we were all moving quickly to try and solve the mission before time ran out. We had about 15 minutes left so we decided to ask for another clue. The tour guide led us to a monitor near the switch board and we had to use the glasses to see what the screen showed. By this time, we were all anxious to figure out how to exit and time wasn’t on our side. My overall observation was that we took a share leadership approach. There were times when one group member would be leading the effort but then someone else may find a clue and that leadership role would shift to a new person. This act of shared leadership seem to be naturally happening however I think having more assigned accountability may have produce better results and would have made the most use of the time. I think we could have benefited from having a central location to place all of the items that we found so that we could all visibly see them at any time. Once we got closer to solving the mission, we got really excited because the lights around the polls started to glow as two of the group members worked in the space with the
To begin the Module we had to establish our teams. As we had previously worked together we chose to work with the same group consisting of myself, CG and HW. (Initials used for confidentiality purposes) Throughout this experience I found that effective team work improved our outcomes as topics could be approached from different angles. Each of us were able to contribute our own thoughts and ideas stemming from our individual experiences, practice and settings and we were able to appreciate new perspectives and techniques from one another. For example, I learnt about the positive experiences that free flow play experiences have had at both CG and HW’s settings.
...ok into consideration the value each men had to his mission, and the kind of group dynamics he would or wouldn’t have to deal with. Deliberating over and producing numerous contingencies may seem to be a nuisance, unless those plans help a crew live to complain about it.
The Orbiter Vehicle (OV) is "the brains and heart of the Space Transportation System" ("The Orbiter," par. 1). Also called the fuselage, it has a cabin for the crew, a large cargo bay and three Space Shuttle Main Engines (SSMEs). The forward part of the orbiter is the crew cabin; it is where the cockpit and living quarters can be found and where mission experiments are performed. The middle part of the orbiter is large open bay and it i...
When asked who was the first man to walk on the Moon most will not have a problem replying “Neil Armstrong.” He has become a household name not only in our Nation but across our entire planet. Many people are familiar with Armstrong’s accomplishments however most are unaware of the efforts invested into these missions by people here on the ground. This paper will focus on ground Flight Control Rooms (FCRs, pronounced "fickers") that contained the talented people who helped usher some of the most important spaceflight events in our current history. First, there will be a brief overview of the Missions Control Center (MCC) history. Next, a section will cover the description of each of the Flight Control Rooms (FCRs). Lastly a thorough assessment of each of the FCRs will explain how each room was and is used as well as for what purpose. This paper will serve as a testament of the history and achievement which had and is continuing to take place during each human spaceflight.
A prominent difference between Rob Hall and Scott Fischer is their leadership styles. In particular, Hall’s leadership style compares to be considerably more stringent the Fischer’s. As Krakauer emphasizes, “. . . he poured over reams of computer print outs detailing logistical minutiae: menus, spare parts, tools, medicine . . . yak availability” (95). This evidence shows how planned out and particular Rob’s group is portrayed. Shown again here, “Hall ran the tightest, safest operation on the mountain. Bar none.” (353). His company is referred to as the safest on the mountain which cannot be obtained without many regulations that are strictly enforced. In much opposition, Fischer has dynamic and easy going leadership style. A basic representation of this is, “Fischer believed in giving his clients free reign to go up and down the mountain independently during the acclimatization period.” (141). I believe Fischer has good intentions, but when dealing with climbers of callow experience, more control should be necessary. A situation in which his lax leadership causes problems is how he never even vaguely establishes a turnaround time. It’s a surmise idea but if everyone on the mountain has been given a correct turnaround time, many lives may have been saved. Granted, Rob Hall never establishes a concrete turnaround time either. Rob’s uptight and Scott’s relaxed leadership styles is a noted difference between the two men.
I agree with the authors’ idea of “Building a wonderful workshop”. This chapter speaks on making our mission our main idea while remembering our core values to help us stay focused on our teammates and purpose. Our mission, values, and team are the foundation, cornerstone, and core of what we do, how well we do it, why we do it, and how we see each other in our given roles. If we as a team earnestly keep this statement and all it incorporates as our focus, then I believe the other eight “secrets” cannot be far off.
“The team is faced with creating cohesion and unity, differentiating roles, identifying expectations for members, and enhancing commitment. Providing supportive feedback and fostering commitment to a vision are needed from the team leaders (Developing Management Skills).” ... ... middle of paper ... ...
As a charismatic and strong leader, Gene respected the judgment and knowledge of each specialty area in his team. Controllers had to develop an intricate non programmed decision 500-step checklist for powering the command module back up in preparation for re-entry, revising it several times in the hours leading up to the spacecraft’s return to Earth. Each team member was held accountable to perfect their individual task, and in result each step was executed correctly resulting in a flawless “successful failure” mission.
Our team did really well with making sure everyone’s ideas were heard, but conversations with another team, who did not successfully complete the simulation, was because one or two people took the lead, and other group members were hesitant to speak up. Compared to other teams, our team managed group thinks effectively. One other team saved more money than us when they completed the challenge, which confirms the assumption we should not have made in trying to implement as many tasks as we did. Every team had challenges with time constraint which was due to a number of factors such as: brand new teams, unclear instructions, and a drop in team morale when the system gave negative feedback at a wrong task. While the successes and challenges were magnified because we were living the experience, and outside observer would have a difference of
The role of the leader in the Everest simulation was to motivate, instruct, resolve conflict and achieve group goals. I, as the team leader, made the point of differentiating myself from a manager, to someone who was extraverted, energetic and driven, within and outside of the simulation. This involved organising location times and communication between members, drawing up the team contract and building relationships between team members beyond the classroom. During the simulation however I chose to adopt a less prominent role to minimise conflict and maximise satisfaction.
Some of the characteristics seen in collaborative leadership are shared problem-solving and decision making. In order to come to a mutual decision between group members, the...
Before a group can achieve the synergistic performance Jimenez is looking for it must meet three preconditions. First, team members have to approach the task at hand with the motivation to work cross-functionally and the confidence that they can produce effective solutions. In Wichita, much of the motivation came from the evident crisis in performance. Everyone in the plant knew that it was underperforming and there is no stronger motivation for action than a survival crisis.
- In my own experiences, I have been both a leader and a manager in my professional life and find that leading can be difficult. Inspiring others to get on the same page and work together toward the same goal has its own challenges. It is much easier to manage the actual tasks associated with the project or the goal than it is to get buy in from others to complete those tasks.
Introduction I. Attention Getter: The International Space Station is the most complex machine ever built by man. Comprising over 1 billion parts, this modern marvel orbits Mother Earth at a speed of over 4 miles every second. II. Relating to the Audience: I believe that the Space Shuttle program has fascinated most, if not all, of you at some point of time, so much so that it has driven some of us to pursue Aerospace Engineering.
In order to gain some purpose while working in a group, I know it can be challenging task to do because every group member is required to agree and cooperate. I am privileged to become a part of a group and completed our task successfully. Our group consists of 5 members and we experienced the stages of group development along with which different roles being considered. Our group formed with the common interest of competing and representing ourselves as competent and knowledgeable. The storming phase involved a trial being held to determine the capabilities of each other and positions were found to be disputed due to which we voted on leader of team. In the norming stage, roles of every group member have been stated and identified with the