Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Michel Foucault's "Panopticism
Michel Foucault's "Panopticism
Michel Foucault's "Panopticism
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Michel Foucault's "Panopticism
In Michel Foucault’s Panopticism, differences between prior and current “political dreams” of order are explored. The first instance of Panopticism that Foucault explores is that of the plague in the seventeenth century. In order to stop the advancement of the plague, the town is placed on a lockdown. No one is allowed to leave or come into the town, people are not allowed to leave their homes, stray animals are killed, and the town is divided into section where syndics monitor the people. These syndics do daily inspections to see who has become ill. Foucault describes these inspections as follows “Everyone locked up in his cage, everyone at his window, answering to his name and showing himself when asked – it is the great review of the living and the dead” (182). In essence, he is describing the inspections that take place daily and the obedience that follows. He compares these acts of obedience to the exclusion of lepers. …show more content…
The exclusion of the lepers differs greatly front that of those suffering from the plague.
The lepers are separated through “binary division”, they are separated from those who do not suffer from leprosy; those suffering from the plague experienced “multiple separations”, there was a hierarchy system of order and surveillance where each person answered to someone else (183). This also contributed to a differing “political dream” which “first is that of a pure community, the second that of a disciplined society” (183). The first political dream refers to the lepers, they were separated from society in an attempt to cleanse the population and eradicate the features of leprosy. The second political dream refers to that of the plague where the people are segmented and obey the authority to form a disciplined
society. This idea of segmenting people and demanding that they submit to an authority has proved useful in asylums, penitentiaries, hospitals, and reform schools. They accomplish this feat my instituting the ideal of Panopticism, a central visible symbol of authority, surrounded by those who must obey. In a prison, there is usually a panopticon, a large guard tower, those who are incarcerated cannot see into the tower, and do not know for certain there is actually anyone in there policing them. Surrounding the panopticon would be individual cells; the incarcerated cannot converse with each other or the guards, but they are made visible by the light that shins through their cell. The incarcerated persons will obey, according to Panopticism, because they are both visible and isolated. While this example applies to a penitentiary setting, the idea of Panopticism is depicted daily. In the classroom an instructor in placed in the center, like the tower, and the students surround them, like the incarcerated. Military barracks, hospitals, factories, and sporting events also utilize this system of organization to their advantage.
In Albert Camus’s novel, The Plague, the characters were brought together as a community because of the rat-induced Black Plague. As Dr. Rieux discovered that the gathering of all the dead rats has caused the epidemic to exacerbate, he and the other doctors urged the authorities to place Oran under quarantine; therefore not letting any of the civilians to be able to make contact with anyone other than with the people in the city. Initially, the civilians acted selfish and only cared for his own life, which is evident in the first part of the novel, “In this respect our townsfolk were like everybody else, wrapped up in themselves; in other words they were humanists: they disbelieved in pestilences.” The authorities also chose to ignore this
Amid the feverish horror of rampant sickness and death, The Plague is a parable of human remoteness and the struggle to share existence. In studying the relationships which Camus sets forth, the relationship between man and lover, mother and son, healer and diseased, it can be seen that the only relationship Camus describes is that between the exiled, and the kingdom for which he searches with tortured longing.
According to David Lyon in his introduction “The search for surveillance theories”, “The panopticon refuses to go away.” (4). The prison architecture invented by Jeremy Bentham became the crucial ‘diagram’ for Foucault. It places an emphasis on self-discipline as the archetypical modern mode, replacing the previous coercive and brutal methods – “it reverses the principle of the dungeon; or rather its three functions – to enclose, to deprive light, and to hide – it preserves only the first and eliminates the other two” (Foucault 200). In 1975, Foucault coined the term ‘panopticism’ in his book Discipline and Punish, which quickly became used to describe Bentham’s utilitarian theory as a whole. However, there has been much debate amongst Bentham scholars as to whether Bentham would have appreciated Foucault’s interpretation of the Panoptic. Philip Schofield writes, “It would have seemed very odd to Bentham, who regarded his Panopticon prison as humane, and an enormous improvement on the practice of the criminal justice system of the time” (qtd. in Ernst-Brunon 2-3). This discrepancy between an increasingly attractive Bentham and a still repulsive Panopticon is largely to be attributed to Foucault. If Foucault’s interpretation of the Pantopticon has made Bentham’s work known to a wider audience, conversely it has also turned Bentham into a forerunner of Big Brother. Bentham scholars have consistently lamented Bentham’s bad name among the general public and Foucault’s hand in the matter.
In his essay “Panopticism,” Michel Foucault introduces the Panopticon structure as proof of modern society tending toward efficient disciplinary mechanisms. Starting with his example of the strict, intensely organized measures that are taken in a typical 17th-century plague-stricken town, Foucault describes how the town employed constant surveillance techniques, centralized a hierarchy of authorities to survey households, partitioned individual structures to impose certain behavior, and record current information about each individual.
You’re sitting alone in the café drinking your coffee and reading the newspaper. You see out of the corner of your eye a little girl sitting with her mom at the table nearby. You keep glancing over and you notice the little girl is staring you down. No matter what you do she continues to watch your every move. You wonder how long she has been sitting there and why she is gazing at you. You are being watched just like the people Michel Foucault describes, people who are simply being under constant surveillance. Foucault's work, "Panopticism," features a central control tower from which all inhabitants are watched while in their surrounding glass-walled cells. The Panopticon creates an atmosphere in which the inhabitants never know whether or not they are being watched forcing them to assume that they are at all times. With this mindset, "the exercise of power may be supervised by society as a whole" (Foucault). In other words, the people control their actions and take care of themselves appropriately just on the fact that they think they are being watched. "In appearance, [panopticism] is merely the solution of a technical problem; but, through it, a whole type of society emerges" (Foucault). The Age of Innocence by Edith Wharton portrays a society that functions much like the Panopticon. Newland Archer and his fellow New Yorkers are part of a very close knit group of people. Everyone knows what everyone else's business and the gossip that surrounds them, which makes privacy a foreign concept. The only way to be accepted is to know the right people, have the right connections and, of course, have money. Once a part of the group, everyone must follow a set of unwritten rules. The society forces everyone to act a certain way, and ev...
Michael Foucault’s chapter titled Panopticism, analyzes how power has advanced in relation to surveillance. The chapter explores how when surveillance first evolved and how the King was the overall dictator and enforcer. The King held all the power and was capable of deciding what rules must be followed and the punishments that were associated with when the rules were disregarded. Punishment and torture was how the King choose to use his power. The King often turned to violence to deter people from committing crimes that he disproved of. It Foucault’s chapter, The body of the condemned, it describe how Robert-François Damiens would be tortured due to his attempt at killing the King. Instead of just
Albert Camus’ The Plague is an influential existentialist novel that vividly depicts the impact of a plague have on a community. Set in the French Algerian city of Oran in the 1940s but based on the Black Plague that swept Europe in the Middle Ages, Camus draws on a large cast of character to portray and embody the historical impact that the plague on both the populace and society. Uniting the experiences of the various characters is Doctor Rieux, who play the role of a plague chronicler, and in the process demonstrates the impact of the plague on religion, social structures, and community morals.
Panopticism, as defined by Michel Foucault in his book Discipline and Punish, is (as proposed by Jeremy Bentham) a circular building with an observation tower in the centre of an open space surrounded by an outer wall. The idea behind this social theory that subjects, being watched by an upper power, always have either complete freedom or none at all. How can they have both you might ask? The subjects cannot see if someone is or isn’t watching them, therefore they should always act at there best. It is almost as if they are on the bad side of a double sided mirror,
Foucault begins his work by describing an imaginary institutional building called the Panopticon to describe discipline and show how power is internalized. The Panopticon is designed to have a circular structure in the middle which houses the watchmen and the cells surrounding the tower. This structure allows only the watchmen to see the prisoners, the prisoners cannot see back. Therefore, the watchmen can constantly monitor the prisoners who are placed in individual cells, exemplifying that visibility is a trap. Although it is impossible to watch each prisoner at the same time, the prisoners do not act out because they never know when they are being watched or not, therefore they indirectly
Rieux’s efforts to confront the plague and ultimately change societal behavior, this novel demonstrates how the fundamental nature of man always reverts to its basic state. After the plague is eradicated, which required the efforts of many different people, society returns to the same structure it had prior to the plague. This idea is a clear example of so many instances that take place in the world around us. Naturally, people are willing to forget something so grand and devastating simply to conform to the society they were once surrounded by. From a wider lense, this often makes no sense; however, time after time, the nature of man often trumps what seems logical as depicted in this
In this passage from "Panopticon" Michael Foucault presents an interesting argument that we live in a society of surveillance. People learn to behave or the personality they develop is from watching others. Powerful people try to study individual to find out why they act or think the way they do to. After finding the answers these people use their knowledge to control people and make them think certain way. Panopticon prison is one of the biggest example of this because it shows how zero guard can control thousands of prisoners. Where before it took hundreds of people to control that many prisoners. what panopticon does is, it puts fear in people's mind that they are being watched all the time. In panopticon the guard is placed in middle of
In order to truly summarize/explain Michel Foucault’s “Panopticism” one must then understand both his point of view as well as Panopticism as a whole. However a primary issue when trying to break down and understand Foucault’s writing is manly due to the fact that his writing, and language itself is difficult to grasp, because at its core this reading is difficult to grasp. The main concept behind Foucault’s “Panopticism” is control and power. These key concepts are stressed throughout Foucault’s entire essay.
Foucault begins to describe what was done in the 17th century to take precaution against the plague. People were locked inside their homes and given rations of food until the end of the plague. Inspections, registrations and constant purification processes were carried out to create a pure community and disciplined society. These are the two ways of exercising power over man. This was a time of separating anything out of the norm from society.
In Michel Foucault’s 1975 work Discipline and Punish, he writes about his ideas of punishment as well as the idea of panopticism, as designed by Jeremy Bentham. Bentham, a utilitarian, writes of his own ideas of punishment in the work, Principles of Morals and Legislation. Bentham’s idea that punishment should always be for a ‘greater good’, focused on the reformation of the criminal, and retributive justice combined with Foucault’s ideas that power and knowledge go hand in hand and plays a part in societal control create a base of ideas on the concept of punishment. Both men’s ideas concerning panopticons also add to this knowledge base. These fundamental ideas play into the idea of what punishment is for and why it has an important role
Michel Foucault theses focuses on disciplinary societies, the idea of creating docile bodies to use them, improve them or change them. Societies achieved this by using the concept of the Panopticon, the idea of surveilling them, people will be aware that they are being watched in schools, prison or hospitals but won’t know when. This prevents people from doing any unethical activity since they don’t know when they are being watched. Panopticism disciplined bodies without the use of punishment from authorities, it deals with the presence of an authoritative figure for surveillance measure only. In today’s era, we are no longer in a disciplinary society, but in a control society. We are being controlled, not as we once were by discipline