Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
The impacts of technology for education
The impact of digital technology on education
Social impact of the internet
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: The impacts of technology for education
Michel Foucault theses focuses on disciplinary societies, the idea of creating docile bodies to use them, improve them or change them. Societies achieved this by using the concept of the Panopticon, the idea of surveilling them, people will be aware that they are being watched in schools, prison or hospitals but won’t know when. This prevents people from doing any unethical activity since they don’t know when they are being watched. Panopticism disciplined bodies without the use of punishment from authorities, it deals with the presence of an authoritative figure for surveillance measure only. In today’s era, we are no longer in a disciplinary society, but in a control society. We are being controlled, not as we once were by discipline …show more content…
Deleuze notes the differences between disciplinary societies and control societies. In a disciplinary society, school and prison exist in an enclosed space, when you were in school, it was the only place where you could have learned something new or get discipline, there was a sense of confinement. You needed to remain in school to get a job and work. On the other hand, control societies can give the people the open spaces they want to create a successful life without the need of attending school, but how can you do this? By taking online classes, working from home and using google and Facebook to learn new things. As Deleuze …show more content…
In The Affective Turn Political Economy, Biomedia, and Bodies, Patricia Clough states that “The function of the media as a socializing/ideological mechanism had become secondary to its continuous modulation, variation, and intensification of affective response in real time, where bodily affect is mined for value. There is a socialization of time as media makes "affect an impersonal flow before it is a subjective content," (220) Facebook would first use your personal interest, your relationships, your favorite music and books etc. as an ambiguous value. After this they would sell these interests and emotions that we are constantly displaying on Facebook to advertising companies. Lastly, they will have these sponsored advertisements on our Facebook for products they think we would buy based on our past post and searches. Facebook erases the difference that existed between commodities and labor, the user becomes both the laborer and the commodity “As capital extracts value from affect-around consumer confidence, political fears, and so forth, such that the difference between commodification and labor, production and reproduction are collapsed in the modulation of the capacity to circulate
The essay by technology reporter for the New York Times, Jenna Wortham, titled, “It’s Not about You, Facebook. It’s about Us” discusses the idea that Facebook has helped shape emotions and now leaves its users emotionless. Although Wortham brings in several sources she does not support these sources with statistics and her personal feelings stand in the way of getting her main points across. In addition, she has a weak conclusion that leaves readers trying to grasp the actual message that Wortham is attempting to convey. Wortham fails to effectively support her thesis that society feels that it can not live without facebook.
Perhaps no other event in modern history has left us so perplexed and dumbfounded than the atrocities committed by Nazi Germany, an entire population was simply robbed of their existence. In “Our Secret,” Susan Griffin tries to explain what could possibly lead an individual to execute such inhumane acts to a large group of people. She delves into Heinrich Himmler’s life and investigates all the events leading up to him joining the Nazi party. In“Panopticism,” Michel Foucault argues that modern society has been shaped by disciplinary mechanisms deriving from the plague as well as Jeremy Bentham’s Panopticon, a structure with a tower in the middle meant for surveillance. Susan Griffin tries to explain what happened in Germany through Himmler’s childhood while Foucault better explains these events by describing how society as a whole operates.
Foucault, Michel. “Panopticism.” Ways of Reading. Fifth ed. Ed. David Barholomae and Anthony Petrosky. Boston: Bedford/St. Martin’s, 1999, 312-342. Print.
Shearing and Stenning's analysis in "From Panopticon to Disneyland” demonstrates Foucault's ideas concerning the disciplinary society. Foucault defined a disciplinary society as “A society characterized by increasing surveillance wherein citizens learn to constantly monitor themselves because they are being monitored. A society in which control over people is pervasive”. Shearing and Stenning’s article does this by illustrating to us how Disney goes about its day to day operations. An example is when exiting the parking lot to get on the monorail to go to the park the people on the train tell all guests to stay with their family for safety. However, this is really done to accomplish two things, one maintain family unity, and two to keep children with their parents so that if a child misbehaves the parents can discipline them instead of the park. “Thus, for example, the batching that keeps families together provides for family unity while at the same time ensuring that parents will be able to control their children” (Shearing and Stenning pg. 298). Foucault’s definition also states that control over people is pervasive or spread throughout. Disney’s way of controlling people is also pervasive, because every garden and fountain are not
Ever feel as though someone is watching you? You know that you are the only one in a room, but for some reason you get an eerie feeling that you are not alone? You might not see anyone, but the eyes of a stranger could be gazing down on you. In Foucault's "Panopticism," a new paradigm of discipline is introduced, surveillance. No one dares to break the law, or do anything erroneous for that matter, in fear that they are being watched. This idea of someone watching your every move compels you to obey. This is why the idea of Panopticism is such an efficient form of discipline. The Panopticon is the ideal example of Panopticism, which is a tool for surveillance that we are introduced to in “Panopticism.” Kurt Vonnegut's "Harrison Bergeron," has taken the idea of surveillance one step further. The government not only observes everyone, but has complete control over society. The citizens of the United States cannot even think for themselves without being interrupted by the government. They are prisoners in their own minds and bodies. The ideals of “Panopticism” have been implemented to the fullest on society in Vonnegut’s "Harrison Bergeron," through physical and mental handicaps.
In the article “Is Facebook Making Us Lonely?” by Stephen Marche, the author tries to show that Facebook impacts on society in the various ways. Moreover, the purpose of this article is to convince the readers that they should really connect to each other like face-to-face contact rather than spending time online the social media. Marche states that “Facebook doesn’t destroy friendships, but it doesn’t create them either” (Marche 608). The author’s audience would be middle-aged adults and middle class in May 2012 that buy and read about the social media because they might be up sad of their life. He also discusses that social network is making us lonely, or if lonely people are addicted to the Internet. However, he states social network is “merely a tool” (608), and we can choose how to use them. Marche sounds very cynical. He is an analyst, but his article is not clear enough. The author’s situation is so complicated because he uses too much examples and stories. Stephen Marche in “Is Facebook Making Us Lonely?” is not effective in using pathos, connotative languages, tone and emotions to convince the reader that they should really connect to each other face-to-face rather than spending time online.
Foucault once stated, “Our society is one not of spectacle, but of surveillance; under the surface of images, one invests” (301). By this, he means that our society is full of constant supervision that is not easily seen nor displayed. In his essay, Panopticism, Foucault goes into detail about the different disciplinary societies and how surveillance has become a big part of our lives today. He explains how the disciplinary mechanisms have dramatically changed in comparison to the middle ages. Foucault analyzes in particular the Panopticon, which was a blueprint of a disciplinary institution. The idea of this institution was for inmates to be seen but not to see. As Foucault put it, “he is the object of information, never a subject in communication”(287). The Panopticon became an evolutionary method for enforcing discipline. Today there are different ways of watching people with constant surveillance and complete control without anyone knowing similar to the idea of the Panopticon.
...easily controls and manipulates the way individuals behave. Although there are no true discourses about what is normal or abnormal to do in society, people understand and believe these discourses to be true or false, and that way they are manipulated by powers. This sexual science is a form of disciplinary control that imprisons and keeps society under surveillance. It makes people feel someone is looking at them and internally become subjective to the rules and power of society. This is really the problem of living in modern society. In conclusion, people live in a society, which has created fear on people of society, that makes people feel and be responsible for their acts. Discourses are really a form in which power is exercised to discipline societies. Foucault’s argument claims discourses are a form of subjection, but this occurs externally not internally.
In the essay, Panopticism, by Michel Focault, he makes the argument that we live in a society of “surveillance”. Meaning that our society is based on amalgamation of “forces and bodies” all of which act to create the individual. It is principally this surveillance which forms the basis of power that draws the individual to believe that the world he lives in is one that is continually watching over him. This constant friction of mental forces (those who fear or have a certain curiosity) shapes who the individual becomes within the society. According to this passage, Focault gives support to the basic argument concerning the panopticon, that communication is key to knowledge. Within the panopticon, there is no communication among the prisoners or those who view them. This becomes another aspect of power; it underlies the main idea of separation and communication as a form of shaping forces in the panopticon.
Foucault, Michel. “Discipline and Punish.” A Critical and Cultural Theory Reader. Ed. Antony Easthorpe, Kate McGowan. Toronto: University of Toronto Press, 2004. Print.
...e concept of panopticon is enough in our society to insure discipline when he says, “A real subjection is born mechanically from a fictitious relation. So it is not necessary to use force to constrain the convict to good behavior, the madman to calm, the worker to work, the schoolboy to application, the patient to the observation of the regulations. Bentham was surprised that panoptic institutions could be so light: there were no more bars, no more chains, no more heavy locks” (Foucault 289). Only thing that our society needs today to make it a better place is panopticon. This is exactly what Foucault is saying when he says, “panoptic institutions could be so light”. People in our society are just like the prisoners inside the panopticon. We think that some is watching from the tower and we behave properly similar to the traffic rules example that I talked about.
Foucault is best remembered for his historical inquiries into the origins of “disciplinary” society in a period extending from the 16th to the 19th centuries. Today, however, under the conditions of global modernity, the relevance of his contribution is often called into question. With the increasing ubiquity of markets, the break up of centralized states and the dissolution of national boundaries, the world today seems far removed from the bounded, disciplinary societies Foucault described in his most famous books. Far from disciplinary, society today is “post panoptic,” as Nancy Fraser has argued — in a move which seems to confirm Jean Baudrillard’s demand that we “forget Foucault.”
Sarah Snyder Professor Feola Gov’t 416: Critical Theory Assignment #2 On Foucault, “Truth and Juridical Forms” Michel Foucault may be regarded as the most influential twentieth-century philosopher on the history of systems of thought. His theories focus on the relationship between power and knowledge, and how such may be used as a form of social control through institutions in society. In “Truth and Juridical Forms,” Foucault addresses the development of the nineteenth-century penal regime, which completely transformed the operation of the traditional penal justice system.
Foucault defines the term panopticon as a prison layout that allowed the prisoner to be “surveilled by wardens at all times without them knowing exactly if they were being looked at.” Its main purpose is to control the person conscious and body, becoming the principal of his own subjection” has on individuals who attempt to contradict the system (Foucault 1995). This ultimately shows the power differences the subjects has versus the people in power. According to Foucault, Panopticism causes prisoners to self-behave which means that inmates adjust and internalize a certain behavior. Moreover, in the reading, Foucault expresses the subject is “seen, but he does not see; he is the object of information, never a subject of communication.” This proves how the panopticism is an essential tool in this capitalist society use as a mechanism to create a false reality that "automatizes and dis individualizes power." Notably, one can recognize a form of totalitarianism within society which is never question. Thus, assume that the oppressed are “right” when in reality they are being dis-individualize power (Foucault 1995). The result of this is having their own increase of some power within the lower ranks. Foucault explains that dominant groups goal is to form these panoptic schemas in order to protect their own interests and power. Generalizing functions such as a disciplinary
The panopticon according to Foucault, is a guard tower in the center of the prison that has the ability to oversee all the prisoners at once conveying constant surveillance. For instance, “Due to the central location of the guard tower, inmates could not always be sure whether or not they indeed were the objects of observation. Therefore Foucault notes that the target of social control is not so much the inmate’s body, but the inmates mind, in that constant surveillance creates a permanent presence in the mind (similar to the effects of surveillance cameras today)” (Welch 2011 pg. 44). In Society today, it is evident that crime is at an all-time low due to the increase in surveillance around the globe. This practice of evolving the panopticon to other tactics has proven to be an effective deterrent. Being a criminal today is much harder today than it was in the