More handpicked essays just for you.
Situational leadership in a changing environment
Situational approach to leadership
Situational leadership theory
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Leadership Style Self-Assessment
Leaders are born, and not made in my opinion. In this assignment I will provide a comprehensive overview of the findings from a leadership style self-assessment that I used to help me gage what type of leader I am. The assessment tool I used consisted of 30 questions in which I circled a score between 1 and 5. 1 represented almost never true, 2 means seldom true, 3 is occasionally true, 4 is frequently true, and 5 meant almost always true. Once I was done answering all questions each column was totaled. The highest score indicates the leadership style that is most representative of you. My highest score was a 38 which means I am a participative democratic style leader. One thing that I found interesting about
…show more content…
According to our text the leader encourages and assists discussion and group decision making. Human relations and teamwork are the focus. The leader shares responsibility with the followers by involving them in decision making (Huber, 2014). This participative democratic leadership style is directly connected with the situational leadership theory. The situational theory approach focuses on observed behaviors of leaders and how leadership styles can be matched to situations (Huber, 2014). I believe these two styles are connected because a person who is a participative democratic leader will check with the group in regards to a policy/problem/situation, and will make a decision based off feedback but also off what is best for the group in general. A participative democratic leader does not always choose the option the group does, but bases things off of situations as they occur. Therefore, the situational theory directly connects to this leadership style. Both the leadership style and leadership theory are representative of me. For example, when I am at work on my unit and I am in charge, I will ask everyone who they want as patients with regards to the assignment. However, the final decision is made by me to ensure that everyone has a balanced assignment, and one nurse is not carrying a heavier patient load. Other …show more content…
My style is considered to be participative democratic which aligns with the situational leadership theory. 3 actions/behaviors required to be successful leader include being active not passive, having/sharing a vision, and finally being a role model. From this assignment I have learned that being a participative democratic leader is a leadership that fosters others opinions, and motivates others. This leadership style allows me to acknowledge when others are doing well, as well as make decisions when certain situations arise without group input. I like that I am a participative democratic leader because I think everyone’s input is important, but I also think that there is an appropriate time in which that input should be
The situational leadership theory states that leaders use different styles and strategies depending on the situation. There are two models that support this theory. The Fiedler’s Contingency Model of Leadership Effectiveness states that an “effective leadership occurs only when there is an ideal match between the leader’s style and the group’s work situation” (pg
The leadership is a result of a combination of traits, with special emphasis on the personal qualities of the leader, which he should possess certain personality traits that would be special facilitators in leadership performance. This theory shows that leaders are born as such, there is no likelihood of 'making' them later with personal development techniques.
Based on the leadership survey, my leadership style is participative in nature. According to Huber (2014), this style of leadership is characteristic of a leader that takes part in completing the assigned task. When I
Democratic leadership styles can be persuasive or consultative. Persuasive – this is where a leader has already made a decision, but takes the time to persuade others that it is a good idea. Consultative – this is where a leader consults others about their views before making a decision. The decision will take into account these views. A laissez-faire type of leadership style allows employees to carry out activities freely within broad limits.
One of the challenges facing nurses today is learning how to be an effective leader. Assessing and analyzing the style of leadership the nurse possesses is the first step in facing the challenge. The purpose of this paper is to analyze and understand the characteristics of my style of leadership from an assessment performed by Gallup Strength Finders and DiSC and compare the strengths I have in common with Eleanor Roosevelt.
The qualities that make a good leader are as varied as the people that fill leadership roles. Some leaders aren’t overly dynamic but somehow get the best out of people while others appear to be too carefree to take seriously. What is it then that makes leaders who they are? A personal philosophy of leadership is that distinguishing trait that every leader possesses. What those leadership characteristics and behaviors are will be explored in the following text, along with what I believe is the best route for me to follow as I work on developing my own personal philosophy of leadership.
As an officer in the United States Army, it has been imperative for me to understand every facet of leadership and why it remains important to be an effective leader. During this course, I have learned some valuable lessons about myself as a leader and how I can improve on my leadership ability in the future. The journal entries along with the understanding of available leadership theories have been an integral part of my learning during this course. For all of the journals and assessments that I completed, I feel it has given me a good understanding of my current leadership status and my future potential as a leader. All of the specific assessments looked at several areas in regards to leadership; these assessments covered several separate focus areas and identified my overall strengths and weaknesses as a leader. Over the course of this paper I will briefly discuss each one of these assessments and journal entries as they pertained to me and my leadership.
Leadership is the glue that binds any business together, identifying and understanding your type of leadership style can ultimately aid you in becoming a better leader in your professional career. A successful business cannot function without leadership therefore this is a crucial aspect of internal employee development for businesses striving to stay relevant in a crowded marketplace. In addition to recognizing your leadership style every leader needs to look to them and identify what type of personality they have. By becoming an informed business leader you will gain trust and respect of your team to guide them into the future and maximizing potential growth. Throughout this paper I will identify my leadership style and also personality type and how it has affected my personal career growth. Identifying these conclusions is extremely important in crafting company culture.
As Yukl (2010) indicates, such factors (e.g. personality, values and capacities) attributed to a leader. Normally it is widespread acknowledged that someone is born to be a lead...
In my view, people employ certain traits that differentiate us from our neighbor next door, and leadership is no different. The test produced by the University of Kent in the United Kingdom (University of Kent, n.d.) has developed a process that I feel accurately defines what sort of leader you are based on 50 simple questions. I was not surprised by the results and found them to be quite accurate and expected. In this essay, I will explore why I feel the test is an accurate way to determine your leadership style due to my personal experience with
Situational Approach was developed by Hersey and Blanchard in 1969. Blanchard states “Effective leaders adapt their style according to the development level of the people they are managing.” It is based on Reddin’s (1967) 3-D management style theory. This approach focuses on leadership in varies situations. In order for this method to be effective a leader must evaluate their behavior and adapt to the situation. It is composed of both directive and a supportive dimension. Each must be applied to any given situation (Northouse, 2013). In order for leaders to be effective within this framework, they must analyze what their followers need and adjust their style to deal with that need. The theory suggests that the level of supervision changes as the follower’s level of maturity increases.
A transactional style is okay sometimes if the situation demands it but that is effective where there is a good amount of trust and respect built in the team. Leadership is not about being in control of others, it is a position of influence where I could shape the direction of a particular project, an initiative or of my team and make an impact. It is important for me to have that purpose but with high self-esteem so as to not let others’ perception or criticism question my own capabilities. With integrity comes trust and responsibilities which in turn create credibility leading people towards achieving common goals. But most importantly, to be a good leader, I must pay attention to myself. Taking care of the team starts with taking care of myself, understanding the limits, identifying tasks that only I can accomplish and delegating other tasks in ways that will engage my team and encourage their
Throughout my life, I have been fortunate to have many opportunities to take on leadership roles, and to use these roles to influence others in very positive ways. After taking the leadership quizzes or survey, I was able to determine that my personal leadership style is Participative. Participative style is the leadership style where a leader gives team the opportunity to wholly take part in
So what does this definition mean to me? First, it means that leaders who embrace a participative leadership style, values and involves their entire team. Second, it means leaders work closely with their team members, focusing on building relationships and rapport. Lastly, it means that leaders allow their team to assist in the decision making process, accepting their input and allowing them to share their ideas. As a leader, I would incorporate this style of leadership when leading project teams because it creates a level of trust between a leader and its members. In addition, this leadership style creates motivation and empowerment. When team member’s skills are acknowledged and their opinions are being valued, they see how their contributions aid in completing the final project goal and take ownership. This type of leadership also provides higher levels of motivation and better strategies and solutions because a variety of people contribute with different perspectives and ideas. Although the team leader is required to give up some control, I believe that the motivational benefits of doing so are greater than with other leadership styles. According to Lam, Xu & Chan (2015), “many practicing managers acknowledge the potential motivational benefits of participative management practice, and value its performance implications” (p. 836). I would
There are a few different types of well known leadership styles, authoritarian, delegative, and democratic. To assess my leadership style I used two online tests to help me determine my style. I felt the results were accurate and I fall into a democratic style/participative style. If I am leading I prefer to include the group and get their feedback on solving issues. However, I still make the final decision after listening to the thoughts of the group on a particular topic. This is considered to be a positive style of leadership that is inspiring to the group involved. The leaders decision making tends to be more accurate due to the input of other experts. (Cite)