Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Leadership influence on organizational culture
Hersey and Blanchard’s situational leadership theory
Servant leadership key words
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Leadership influence on organizational culture
Situational Approach
Situational Approach was developed by Hersey and Blanchard in 1969. Blanchard states “Effective leaders adapt their style according to the development level of the people they are managing.” It is based on Reddin’s (1967) 3-D management style theory. This approach focuses on leadership in varies situations. In order for this method to be effective a leader must evaluate their behavior and adapt to the situation. It is composed of both directive and a supportive dimension. Each must be applied to any given situation (Northouse, 2013). In order for leaders to be effective within this framework, they must analyze what their followers need and adjust their style to deal with that need. The theory suggests that the level of
…show more content…
Directing is a high directive-low supportive style in which the leader focuses on communicating the goal that is to be achieved. Coaching is high directive-high supporting in which the leader focuses on both meeting the followers needs and communicating the goal. A supporting approach allows the leader to use supportive behaviors that bring out the employee’s skill set. It is a high supportive-low directive style. Lastly, delegating is low supportive-low directive style. Delegating is where the leader allows the follower to develop their confidence and motivation but giving them control over what happens. It becomes their responsibility to accomplish the …show more content…
Spears identified 10 characteristics from Greenleaf’s writings that are key to servant leadership. First, listening, in which leaders and followers participate in an interactive process in which servant leaders listen first. Second, empathy, servant leaders demonstrate what they understand about the followers. Third, healing, servant leaders support and care about the followers well-being. Fourth, awareness, its belief is that servant leaders have an understanding of the impact they have on individuals. Fifth, persuasion, is the persistent communication that convinces others to change not coercion. Sixth, conceptualization, servant leaders must be a visionary who can see the “big picture.” Seventh, foresight, the ability to predict future actions based off what is currently happening and what has happened in the past. Eighth, stewardship, servant leaders acknowledge the role they have been entrusted with and realize it comes with a great deal of responsibility. Ninth, commitment to the growth of people, ensures that each each person within the organization grows personally and professionally. Tenth, building community, servant leaders are charged with creating a safe space where people can fell
Sims Jr., H. P., Faraj, S., & Yun, S. (2009). When should a leader be directive or empowering? How to develop your own situational theory of leadership. Business Horizons, 52, 149-158. DOI: 10.1016/j.bushor.2008.10.002
According to Fiedler (cited in Bolden, Gosling, Marturano & Dennison, 2003)., there is no single characteristic or trait that will create a successful leadership style. Rather, he argues that situations actually shape a general leadership style of a manager. Bolden, Gosling, Marturano and Dennison (2003) have observed that within an environment with repetitive tasks, the most effective leadership style might be a directive one, while a participative leadership style might be required in a dynamic environment. Being an effective leader means to control important specific situations. Taking into account these situations, Fiedler presented three situational components that are considered essential for an effective leadership: leader-member relations, task-structure and position power.
Situational leadership is a theory which was designed in 1969 by Paul Hersey and Ken Blanchard. The “contingency theories of leadership” states that a leader’s effectiveness is dependent on their behaviours in relation to different situational factors. Thus, situational leadership theory, relates to how a leader 's effectiveness is depend on their ability to adjust their leadership behaviour to the required level of the “followers” capability or if the situation is modified.
The situational leadership theory states that leaders use different styles and strategies depending on the situation. There are two models that support this theory. The Fiedler’s Contingency Model of Leadership Effectiveness states that an “effective leadership occurs only when there is an ideal match between the leader’s style and the group’s work situation” (pg
Hersey, P. & Blanchard, K. (n.d.) Situational Leadership. In Wren, J.T. (Ed.). (1995). The Leader’s Companion (pp. 207-211). New York: Simon & Schuster.
Have you ever had a leader that inspired you to develop your own leadership traits? “A leader is someone who demonstrates what’s possible” (Mark Yarnell, 2015). There are numerous leadership styles. Each of the numerous leadership styles can be beneficial if utilized in an appropriate means. I have chosen three leaders and their unique leadership styles to discuss in this paper. The unique styles that will be discussed are situational leadership, transformational leadership, and laissez-faire leadership. I will also discuss each leader’s approaches, their fundamental leadership principles, and how each leader used their style within their profession.
The leadership is a result of a combination of traits, with special emphasis on the personal qualities of the leader, which he should possess certain personality traits that would be special facilitators in leadership performance. This theory shows that leaders are born as such, there is no likelihood of 'making' them later with personal development techniques.
Northouse, P. (2010). Leadership: Theory and practice (5th ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications, Inc.
A situational leader is the one who will use a different leadership style according to the need and specific situation at the moments.
Creating a structured environment and opportunities to apply what employee have learned and firmly delegate authority will lead viable outcomes in productivity. Managers utilizing situational leadership will have the platform to change their style to meet the workers’ needs and allow for growth and professional development to meet the operational needs.
Hersey and Blanchard’s Situational Leadership Theory (SLT) asserts that a leader’s effectiveness is dependent upon the readiness, or ability and willingness, of the leader’s followers to complete a task. This leadership style is an amalgamation of task-oriented and relationship-oriented characteristics that are employed depending upon the situation and the followers involved. According to the SLT, as followers increase in readiness the leader’s style is to adapt accordingly (Kinicki & Kreitner, 2009).
“Situational theory tends to focus more on the behaviours that the leader should adopt, given situational factors (often about follower behaviour), whereas contingency theory takes a broader view that includes contingent factors about leader capability and other variables within the situation”
Leadership Theories and Studies. (2009). In Encyclopedia of Management. Retrieved July 20, 2011 from http://www.highbeam.com/doc/1G2-3273100155.html
The contemporary era is the time with constant changes and new demands. In view of this point, we can't put unitary leadership into real work. Accordingly, the term of "contingency leadership theory" (also namely "situational leadership") is given rise to by those situational factors. This theory notes that managers can vary their styles to suit different circumstances.
The Situational Theories of leadership explain how leadership style must be tailored to the demands of the task and the qualities of subordinates.