Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Sociological Theories of Deviance
Sociology of deviant behavior
Sociological Theories of Deviance
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Sociological Theories of Deviance
The Dysfunctional Family
What is a dysfunctional family? According to the internet it is a family in which conflict, misbehavior and often child neglect occur regularly and continually leading other members to accomadote such actions. I was given the assignment of a group analysis and at first I chose to write about detention facilities also known as jail or prisions, However, I got to writing and something thst I felt impacted my learning and understanding more is the study of a dysfunctional family. Therefore, I choose to dedicate some time to what I considered a dysfunctional family. Thru, my evaluations I will disusss some of the many sociological concepts I observed such as, deviance.collective behavior, norms, gender roles ,diversity
…show more content…
Specifically the lack of communication is what starts the down ward spirial. This family lacked communication which caused enourmous conflict. The father went out nightly, therefore, mom let her insecurities sink in and automatically thouhjt it was due to another woman, as a result, everyday when dad came home they argued. This conflict caused tension, resentment and hate. He could never give an answer to where he was, or why he didn’t come home. She begaun to feel lower about herself. Eventually this led her into a depression. Poor communication is a hallmark for dysfunctional families. Ineffective or non exisits communication makes it difficult to express the needs and wants which led to misunderstandings and eventually separation. This family could function when needed to but as indivuals they both had issues within themselves and each other. If they just sat down and expressed their problems adnlearned that the past is the past and move toward the future together they might have survived. However, sometimes one partner hold on to something thaats is a fatham of the imagination. Let me explain, the dad strugglerd everyday on when he was going leave mom may have thought leaving him and mom wanted to leave him. The mental abuse he tolerated from him was literally destroying her…but she just wanted to say that she had a family. Just the idea of a family ment mre to her even if it meatn everyone in the family was sad. She just envisioned a traditional norm of society. She wanted to have that white picket fence, eat dinner at 6:30 and and have family discussion. Thus, this probably destroyed them because he did not vision those things. In fact, he told her that in todays society that ‘’Leave It To Beaver” lifestyle did not exists. Perhaps, they could have communicated better and came to a happy medium and saved their
There were no other people besides the family that knew about what was going on, so there was no opportunity for anyone to step in and help. The family kept the secrets of what was going on and it seemed as though they suffered from Family Systems Theory where “it is the family's reaction to an event, or their ability to cope in an emotionally stable manner (Opipari, 2010, pp. 125) that determines how they function. There was no balance, there was no speaking on their emotions, so this limited any option for intervention coming from the or outside their family.
There is no such thing as being ‘the perfect family’. Every family is unique and different in their own ways. They have their troubles, struggles, and weaknesses in their lives. The novel, The Glass Castle: a memoir by Jeannette Walls share the theme of a dysfunctional family. Firstly, the parent of the main character, Rose Walls is not an ideal motherly figure to her children. Secondly, the Walls children are not being treated the way they should be for their age. Finally, the parent of the lead character, Rex Walls is not a role model of a fatherly figure to his kids. When the family acts in a dysfunctional way it affects each individual and the family negatively.
According to smith and Hamon (2012), Families are considered as a whole in society. However, they believed that couples have many components in which makes up the family, if one component is missing, the family as a whole can get unbalance (Smith & Hamon, 2012). In the Brice’s family, communication was the component that was missing. The couple was not able to communicate their differences, which was what caused Carolyn and David to verbally insult each other. Smith and Hamon (2012), also explain that a person who expresses his or her feeling is considered as someone who is breaking the functions of their family system; especially if the person is focusing on the individual who is causing the problem, rather than the problem itself. In the Brice family, Carolyn could be considered the one that cause the dysfunction in the family structure because she was focusing on David as the problem of their marriage, rather than focusing of the elements that are causing their problems. Smith and Hamon (2012) explain that individuals should focus on how to solve a problem, rather than trying to find who is causing the
It contains adults of both sexes, at least two of whom maintain a socially approved sexual relationship, and one or more children, own or adopted, of the sexually cohabiting adults” (p.1). Parents are the main influence in a child’s life and have the responsibility to be affectionate and nurturing towards their children. Conversely, dysfunctional parents with destructive influences tend to have troubled kids. Depending on the child’s social environment, there are some children in this world whom are not as fortunate enough to have a loving mother and father. The functionalist perspective focuses on keeping the family functioning regardless of the dysfunctions that can occur. (Bereska 10) A dysfunctional family is a threat to the stability of the greater society. However, from this functionalist perspective other structures come in by filling in the gaps that are missing in order to restore normality/ the
Many families have certain roles and traditions that are followed by being taught or just by habit. Within those families are certain roles that are followed or taken on. Some families are patriarchal meaning that the man or father is more dominant or in charge and some families are matriarchal being that the mother is in charge or more dominant and in control. For some families these certain roles fit the family perfectly with not much of an issue which can balance out the family. But unfortunately for other families these roles break the household down making the household unbalanced. And this can cause the family to lack in some areas such as understanding, communication, or forgiveness.
Walsh, Froma (2003). Normal Family Processes: Diversity and Complexity. New York, NY: Guilford Press http://family.jrank.org/pages/1577/Single-Parent-Families-Effects-on-Children.html retrieved August 24, 2008
Everyday numerous families find themselves in positions where their families have gone through some type of turmoil. Transitions throughout the lifecycle are both expected and normal for all individuals and families. It becomes problematic when members of these families cannot communicate effectively and the families become stagnant in their chaos and cannot seem to move forward, in any, manner, to resolve the inappropriate behaviors being exhibited within their family system. This paper will focus on the Jacques family and assess their issues both as a family system and individually to develop an ethical plan to address their issues.
Interpersonal conflict is. Every relationship has conflict and determining on how the conflict is resolved or handled can make the relationship stronger or weaker. If someone is more easily to come up with a compromise rather than always getting their own way, they may have stronger relationships (Bevan and Sole, 2014). Television shows also use interpersonal conflict between their characters to find a solution or compromise in the end. Interpersonal conflict is all around us, it is how we handle that conflict that makes or breaks our relationships.
According to Barbara Ehrenreich in “Are Families Dangerous?,” families are the most dangerous place to be, because of several reasons. First, for women the most unsafe place to be is inside her own home. This is because the people who love you the most are the ones who abuse and murder their loved ones. According to Charles Fourier, “the family is the barrier to human progress,” which leads me to believe that Ehrenreich is trying to portray the family as a downside to our society instead of a positive aspect of our lives. Subsequently, there is no such thing as the “functional” family, each and every family needs counseling and policies to provide guidance. Families cause damage to children because of a constant attack on one’s self esteem. Most importantly, according to Ehrenreich families are the source of violence within our world, she believes if we would disband our families our world would be a much improved living environment.
Ultimately, dysfunctional families create a selfish and unsuspecting society that is ruled by a government of great dominance over the people.
Why do teens use drugs? Many reasons contribute to adolescent drug use. It may be stress, peer pressure, or even the difficulty coping with the ills of school life. Teens use drugs because they have no true guidance. The absence, of certain vital components such as, someone to talk to, morals, values, or even responsibility forces teens to use drugs. One major contributing cause of adolescent drug use and abuse is a dysfunctional family, a family that does not provide all of the above.
"A family is a small social group of people related by ancestry or affection, who share common values and goals, who may live together in the same dwelling, and who may participate in the bearing and raising of children. They have a physical or emotional connection with each other that is ongoing" (Vissing, 2011) and is the foundation of all societies. They can be formed by a grouping of father-mother-children or even more complicated combination of relatives. In the primary stage of family life in the United States, everyone from every generation lived together in one house. Subsequently, the idea of traditional family evolved and a married couple with children is at present, often called the traditional family. There are many types of families; however, this paper will focus on the traditional family. It will describe how the functionalist perspective, conflict perspective, and the interactionism theory apply to the sociological institution known as a family. It will explain some of the similarities and differences between the sociological theories in regards to families and how they affect the family members.
could simply be a symptom of a greater problem such as the breakdown of the family, and
Sociologists look at society from either a macro or micro view and the theories that define their work are based on those perspectives. There are several family theories that we learned about this semester. Briefly, Structural-Functionalism and Conflict Theory are “macro” theories in sociology. Structural-Functionalism sees society as a living machine made up of different parts which work together for the good of society. Individuals, as well as Institutions work together, and the family is the key to the well-functioning machine. Emile Durkheim, considered the Father of Sociology argues social solidarity, where people do the right thing, create harmony and have shared values. According to Durkheim the nuclear family is the only type of institution that can achieve that. Conflict Theory sees society as a pyramid with those at the top having more power and influence than those at the bottom. Males in society have more power than females. There is a power imbalance, which could lead to oppression o...
Families provide people with an atmosphere in which to live, grow, and develop. A family culture is established by the parents and instilled in the children during their upbringing. A healthy family is a family which follows a set of strong morals, stays loyal to one another, cooperates, and works together to avoid conflict. An environment where there is openness amongst family members is ideal because minds that are open are more susceptible to avoiding conflict than minds that are closed. If conflict gets the best of a family, it has the potential to increase hostility and create remoteness between family members, however, if a family resolves conflict, it can strengthen and enforce the family relationships.