Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Role of leadership in the society
The role of leadership in shaping organizational culture
Essay on transformational leadership style
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Role of leadership in the society
INTRODUCTION Leadership, like the Sufi proverb of the blind men describing an elephant in terms of its parts, is all of these – it has many facets, dimensions and aspects. (Allio, R, 2013).Leadership is an important dimension to the success of an Organization without it a large component of businesses would suffer irreparable damage. With that being said, how does an organisation increase its leadership effectiveness ?, it can do this by asking its management team to create a philosophy that can assist them design who and what they want to be as leaders (Benson, D, 2016) this philosophy can only ensure continued success. The report will seek to establish a correlation between leadership and the events that have been recorded on the reflective …show more content…
AN OVERVIEW OF INFFECTIVE LEADERSHIP The analysis of leadership requires a breakdown of what ineffective leadership is and what effective leadership is? Ineffective leadership can be characterised by narcissism, narcissism has traits of dominance, self-entitlement, grandiosity as well as low empathy. Narcissism is further described as preoccupation with power, arrogance and an inflated sense of self-importance (Pathak, M, 2013). All of these traits correctly describe the demeanour of the operations executive as outlined in the reflective log. It should be noted that ineffective leadership is coupled with leader behaviour (Howell, Bowen, Kerr, Dorfman and Podsakoff 1990). What are the causes of ineffective leadership, a suggestion is made by (Kelloway, Sivanathan, Francis and Barling 2004) is that some leaders lack the traits that are required to make them good leaders as well as having inflexible behaviours. The question then becomes, how do you manage ineffective leadership or how do you guide a leader to the right path. Kelloway, Sivanathan, Francis and Barling 2004) again, by using the adverse, a leader should be able to identify behaviours with each situation and apply themselves accordingly. The leader should have the appropriate diagnostic skills to assess a situation, if not they should be trained therefore improving their …show more content…
A study by (Prasad and Junni, 2014) suggests the following; leaders who have a Transformational leadership style have the ability to provide inspiration and motivation. They are able to position themselves as role models and are able to gain subordinates trust and confidence. Transformational leadership also has benefits such as improving an organisations innovation, this is done through intellectual stimulation and seeking openness among staff. They expand on their study by also factoring in transactional leadership, which requires appealing to self-interest of subordinates by exchange relationships. Transactional leadership has been purported to assist in organisational learning and providing staff with strong goals, clear expectations and rewards. Figure 1 below shows a representation on the popularity of the Transformational leadership style followed by the Transactional leadership style. Figure 1 – Academy of Educational Leadership Journal,
One may wonder exactly what it is that qualities a strong leader possesses. A strong leader is determined, and strong willed. They must be of good judgment, and without bias. They cannot easily be persuaded, and they are firm, yet at the same time, a good lead must also empathize with his subordinates, and have the best interest at heart for said subordinates, at all times. However, with that being said, a good leader cannot be afraid to discipline his subordinates when necessary. Unmistakably, being a leader is a very difficult feat – one which not everyone can accomplish. A leader must be an authority, a friend and a counsellor, all at once. They must be responsible, and always take into account the disadvantages of a situation. Not everyone is suitable to be a leader, whereas, just about anybody can be a good role model.
“Before you are a leader, success is all about growing yourself. When you become a leader, success is all about growing others” (Welch). Leadership is inspiring others to learn more, do more, and become more. Ineffective fail to possess certain characteristics which effective leaders do. Willingness to help others, selflessness, and strictness; these are the qualities of a both good and effective leader. Without these qualities, leadership would fail and being a leader would mean nothing.
Kellerman, B. (2004). Bad Leadership: What it is, How it Happens, Why it Matters. Boston, Massachusetts: Harvard Business Press.
Leadership at times can be a complex topic to delve into and may appear to be a simple and graspable concept for a certain few. Leadership skills are not simply acquired through position, seniority, pay scale, or the amount of titles an individual holds but is a characteristic acquired or is an innate trait for the fortunate few who possess it. Leadership can be misconstrued with management; a manager “manages” the daily operations of a company’s work while a leader envisions, influences, and empowers the individuals around them.
According to explanations provided by DuBrin (2012), narcissistic leadership is understood to be a form of leadership provided by individuals who are narcissistic. In the society, narcissistic individuals are found to be those that are more concerned about themselves and their actions are only those that improve their own self even at the expense of others. When it comes to leadership, which is a position that leads or takes charge of a group of people, Campbell & Miller (2011) says it is like a form of an opportunity given to improve the leader’s social status. Thus, narcissistic leadership is a form of leadership that does not build others and hence it is not found to be effective enough. Good introductory paragraph helps follow the discussion
Lord, R. (2000). Leadership. In A. E. Kazdin (Ed.), Encyclopedia of psychology, vol. 4. (pp. 499-505). Doi:10.1037/10519-216
‘Leadership’ and ‘Management’ are two commonly using words in nowadays organizations. The essential and integral part of productive management is leadership. Effective leadership is crucial to an organization’s success. Leaders can take a quantity of different steps to help keep projects from failing. The main and highly important focus of the leader is to make things happen. According to Griffin (2008), ‘Leadership, as a process, the use of non coercive influence to shape the group’s or organization’s goals, motivate behaviour toward the achievement of those goals, and help define group or organizational culture; as a property, the set of characteristics attributed to individuals who are perceived to be leaders’. Equally as management, that
To be an authentic leader one must discover their True North and the purpose of leadership. Leadership decides the success or failure of organizations. The chief cause of organizational failure for the last decade has been failed leadership. A leader’s
Research is based on the theory that Transformational leadership drives followers to motivation for organizational success. Fueled by views of James MacGregor-Burns, Steven Covey, Peter Drucker, Lussier and Achua, Bass, Baldoni and other leading researchers of Transformational Leadership Style. Transformational Leadership style, assisted by effective communication and influence of Transactional Leadership is proven to bring out high morale and productivity with followers.
Within leadership, there is the opportunity for many issues in itself. Leadership styles and practices, one of the most vital aspects determining productivity in organizations, is truly what sets the standard for every level of management within a company. If a proper leadership style is not chosen and followed to lead a team within an organization, there will be no one to follow and the team will certainly not be successful. The repercussions of poor leadership will certainly make a drastic difference in a company. This can include the needs of not only employees, but
A leader sets the tone for those they supervise. Having a weak or ineffective leadership style turns what could be a productive organization into one that lacks direction, is chaotic, and fails to live up to its potential. Incompetent central leadership can also cause a power struggle amongst the other remaining team members. Groups seek leadership; when leaders fail to use their powers others will maneuver to use the power left in the void. This can lead to a power-struggle and backstabbing (Morgan, 2007).
Employees are rewarded or penalized based on their performance. There is no personal motivation to perform well other than the monetary or positional benefit. These leaders work within a previously created framework to maintain the status quo. Transactional leadership enables the organization to achieve short-term goals quickly by offering a reward for achieving the target. Under this leadership style employee creativity and engagement are low, because they work to achieve a preset goal.
The transaction leader differs approach differs from the transformational leader. In general it is motivated by a change taking place. According to McLaurin and Almiri, transactional leadership is a bargaining exchange process between the leader and the follower, lead to the expected or planned outcomes, focus on maintaining the status quo, does not consider the needs of the followers on an individual basis, and the flow of power is more stable than the transformational leader.
There are many examples of poor leadership behavior in today’s workplace. Inadequate leadership can be detrimental not only to a team within an organization, but also to the entire organization itself. I believe it is vital for upper management to ensure that their leaders are properly trained and aware of how to handle certain situations and employees. When a leader’s weaknesses are overlooked, large problems occur.
Because of this fact most organizations and entrepreneurs are paying close attention the the leaders they put in place to lead their company and its people into victory, which is the ultimate goal of their organizations. It is a well known fact that leadership is an important factor in an organization’s success, but the type of leadership style and as well as the leader 's personality is what really determines that level of success. In my research I have concluded that the most important leadership styles are transformational and transactional leadership. Transformational leadership has the potential to resurrect, transform and keep companies evolving with time. Transactional leadership although can have some negative effects on some, but if used properly, can promote compliance almost a stagnant team through both rewards and punishments. When companies are pursuing leaders, they not only look at their candidates experiences knowledge of a particular sector of that business, but they pay close attention to the personalities of these individual. They do so because they know that one’s leadership style and abilities is heavily affected by the candidates own personality and views. As a result of this thinking, it has lead all authors involved in both research paper and article “Relationship Between Leaders Personality Types and Source of Power and leadership Styles Among Managers” and “