Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Ethics in our society
The importance of the ethics
The importance of the ethics
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Ethics in our society
When considering knowledge acquired from both the arts and the natural sciences, can the means of production be limited by ethical judgements? Ethics are a system or set of moral principles . Ethical judgements therefore, are judgements we make of what ought to be, judgements made using reason or moral principle. The pursuit of knowledge has the potential to take us to unconceivable areas of new knowledge, in both art and natural science. Exploration for knowledge is therefore a limitless expanse of opportunity. However I believe ethical judgements do not limit the methods available in the production of knowledge in both the arts and natural sciences.
All scientific hypothesis cannot be absolutely proven without some form of testing as proof, or until all possible oppositions are unarguably disproved, however one cannot be sure whether all possible conflicts have been considered and disproved. Natural science aims to explain and understand phenomena. In order to prove a hypothesis, it is required to have testing, to provide evidence for the hypothesis. Science can, therefore, provide an explanation based on fair research backed by rigorous checks and balances, and not on only belief. This shows that false scientific theories can never get past the stage of appropriate testing, without being disproven.
In the mid-20th century, scientist Harry Harlow conducted experiments upon maternal isolation and social isolation on infant monkeys. The infant monkeys were kept in cages, with 2 replica surrogate mothers in the form of a cloth mother, and a wire mother with a bottle. Harlow researched into the maternal characteristics of monkeys compared to human babies. Furthermore, Harlow experimented on social isolation, keeping the baby monke...
... middle of paper ...
...tural sciences, ethical judgements do not limit the methods of production. Similarly free expression in art, does subdue ethical judgement in the method of producing knowledge. Art can be linked with Natural science, where natural science seeks to provide knowledge, art seeks to represent knowledge, in a way which appeals to our senses, Cocteau (1918: 11) sums up this idea well saying, ‘Art is Science made clear’. In order to create a representation of crude reality, to express knowledge, art must be created. The methods in how knowledge in art is produced are not ethically considered, due to the fact that art is a representation of the crude reality. If ethics were considered when making art, then art would have a different meaning. Thus, Ethical judgements do not limit the methods available in the production of knowledge in both the arts and the natural science.
According to Klaus and Kennell, there are specific events, including skin-to-skin contact between mother and infant that must occur directly following the birth of a primate infant. This maximizes the chances of survival for the newborn not only because their mother is a source of food, but also because they will learn the culture they need to be successful in their environment. In the study, Klaus and Kennell test how much time a baby spends crying when they are separated from their mother. They concluded the increased time in babies that were separated was due to the anxiety that separation caused. The difficulty in this is that the cause of the baby’s distress is subjective. Also the notion of critical period proposed that the bonds and lessons taught during that time could not be developed later.
During the twentieth century, Harry Harlow performed one of the most controversial experiments that led to a scientific breakthrough concerning the parent-child relationship. It paved the way for understanding terms such as secure, insecure, ambivalent, and disorganized relationships (Bernstein, 2014, 364). During the course of this study, Harlow separated baby monkeys from their birth mothers and isolated them in frightening environments. According to the video “H.H. Overview”, this proved the monkey’s preference for a comforting mother versus a nutritional one. However, this raises the question: can his experiments be deemed ethical, or did his scientific inquiry overstep boundaries?
Bowlby’s idea was to draw a comparison between ethology and infants. Harlow’s (1958) simultaneous experiment demonstrated that infant monkeys who were separated and isolated from their mothers in their early stages ...
In Gaut’s essay, “The Ethical Criticism of Art”, he addresses the relevance of an art piece’s ethical value when making an aesthetic evaluation. His key argument revolves around the attitudes that works of art manifest such that he presents the following summary “If a work manifests ethically reprehensible attitudes, it is to that extent aesthetically defective, and if a work manifests ethically commendable attitudes, it is to that extent aesthetically meritorious”. In direct contrast with formalists, who divine a work’s merit through an assessment of its style and compositional aspects, Gaut states that any art piece’s value requires a pro tanto judgement. This pro tanto position allows for pieces considered stylistic masterpieces, to be
Harry F. Harlow was an American Psychologist who studied human behavior and development through studies of social behavior of monkeys. Harlow got his BA and PhD of Psychology from Stanford University. Then, later on got a job and did his studies at the University of Wisconsin. Harlow’s experiment consisted of young monkeys being separated from their mother right after birth. Then, the monkeys were raised in the laboratories which had mothers that were made up of wired mesh and another with wood and a terry cloth. When the infant monkeys were placed in the cage with only one mother was equipped with a nipple which was the wired mesh mother. It was placed so the infant monkey could nurse. Even though the wired monkey had nourishment, the young monkey would most often cling to the terry cloth mother. Harlow would place a monkey inside a cage. Then, began to make loud noises against the cage or play recordings that made the monkey feel insecure. The monkey always seemed to go toward the terry cloth mother as it began to get scared. The infant monkey would go for comfort, but eventually would get nourishment from the wired mother.
A famous thought experiment in quantum physics is that of Schrödinger’s cat. In this experiment, a cat is placed in a box with poison that has a chance to either explode, killing the cat, or not explode, allowing the kitty to live. Although some would object, we ought to open the box to see if the cat is alive or not. Similarly, we should attempt to uncover reality instead of accepting the current dogma. In his article, “Can the Sciences Help Us to Make Wise Ethical Judgements?” Paul Kurtz argues that not only can science help through inquiry but it already plays an active role in shaping our moral conduct. According to him, ethical judgement and science meet somewhat halfway and although we cannot come up with a specific set of instructions
Harlow’s experiment shows the connection of mother and child using monkeys. From this experiment you can see that withdrawal or removal can cause depression in the rhesus monkeys. Harlow further relates that to children and their mothers. Seeing that there was too much maternal contact he notes that over attachment can cause severe depression.
“The end justifies the means” is the famous quote of Machiavelli (Viroli, 1998) which puts the emphasis of morality on the finale results rather than the actions undertaken to achieve them. Is this claim true in the field of the natural sciences? Whether atomic bombings, as a mean used to end World War II, justifies the death of civilians in Hiroshima and Nagasaki? What is moral limitation in the acquisition of knowledge in the natural sciences? How is art constrained by moral judgment?
For over two thousand years, various philosophers have questioned the influence of art in our society. They have used abstract reasoning, human emotions, and logic to go beyond this world in the search for answers about arts' existence. For philosophers, art was not viewed for its own beauty, but rather for the question of how art and artists can help make our society more stable for the next generation. Plato, a Greek philosopher who lived during 420-348 B.C. in Athens, and Aristotle, Plato’s student who argued against his beliefs, have no exceptions to the steps they had to take in order to understand the purpose of art and artists. Though these two philosophers made marvelous discoveries about the existence of art, artists, and aesthetic experience, Plato has made his works more controversial than Aristotle.
Bellows was an experienced realist painter while the young artist was a new blood and his style was too fashion-minded to compare with Bellows’. In this point, personal experience may affect people to be either conservative or grateful to adapt the art piece. If experts involve their personal experience or emotion when generating opinions, it may cause unfairness to the owner of the piece, like the artist of “Fountain” was even disenchanted with the artistic group, thus limit the art creation in our society. Nevertheless, it may even cause ethics violation. Like the nude art does create a moral problem since the social moral tells us that displaying the nude body publicly was wrong.
Production of knowledge is generally seen in a positive light. However, when ethics and morality become involved in the process of production, judgements will undoubtedly be made that may seem to limit the availability of that knowledge. Ethical judgements are made by the combination of a knower, his or her standard of value, and the situation itself. In the field of the arts and natural sciences, ethics plays a crucial role in the extent one may possibly be allowed to go when discovering new knowledge. Reason and emotion are important ways of knowing that help guide knowers in making certain moral decisions.
Science must be tested by the natural world, but what if the testing doesn’t prove anything? Some people believe that gaps in evidence disprove things. One of the prime factors that proves evolution is fossils. It can show us where we’ve come from, where other species have come from and so on. Some people believe that if there are breaks in the fossil records that means that evolution is disproved.
The human sciences and natural sciences are considered knowledge by many worldwide, as their arguments having convinced people one way or another. While the natural sciences focus on swaying belief by showing duplicable evidence through a strict and standardized methodology, the human sciences focus on explaining how things are and how they came to be using logic, reason, and an understanding of human behavior.
Progression is a natural occurrence in human life as well as society. Natural curiosity, coupled with a desire for self improvement, has propelled mankind into the age of science and technology. As society progresses, so, too, does human life continue to advance and improve. Medical advances have allowed humans to overcome disease and illness, and ultimately prolog human life. For example, the success of stem cell research has granted doctors the resources to replace damaged cells and begin to repair severe injuries. The amount of scientific progress making its way into society is astounding. However, eventually the question emerges, how far should these advancements be allowed to continue? And at what point do humans bypass medical need to such advances and begin to strip themselves of their humanity? The question of how far humans should allow science to penetrate the natural makeup of humans is delicate, and not one that will result in an unanimous opinion. Yet, before humans can address this subject, they must question whether or not they have the right to alter nature to any extent.
Ethics is the study of moral values and the principles we use to evaluate actions. Ethical concerns can sometimes stand as a barrier to the development of the arts and the natural sciences. They hinder the process of scientific research and the production of art, preventing us from arriving at knowledge. This raises the knowledge issues of: To what extent do moral values confine the production of knowledge in the arts, and to what extent are the ways of achieving scientific development limited due to ethical concerns? The two main ways of knowing used to produce ethical judgements are reason, the power of the mind to form judgements logically , and emotion, our instinctive feelings . I will explore their applications in various ethical controversies in science and arts as well as the implications of morals in these two areas of knowledge.