Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
About public opinion
About public opinion
Essay on spiral of silence theory
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: About public opinion
In 1974 German political scientist Elisabeth Noelle-Neumann introduced the Spiral of Silence theory. The Spiral of Silence theory describes the process by which one opinion becomes dominant, as those who perceive their opinion to be in the minority, do not speak up because society threatens individuals with fear of isolation (“Spiral of Silence,” n.d.,¶ 2). Neumann (1974) introduced the Spiral of Silence as an attempt to explain in part how public opinion is formed (Griffin, 2002, p. 373). She wondered why the Germans supported wrong political positions that led to national defeat, humiliation and ruin in 1930’s-1940s (Griffin, 2002, p. 373). The theory posits that individuals remain silent for a few reasons. One reason being the fear of isolation, when the group or public realizes that the individual has a divergent opinion from the status quo (“What is the Spiral of Silence?,” n.d., ¶2). The second reason being the fear of reprisal, in the sense that voicing said opinion might lead to a negative consequence beyond that of mere isolation, for example loss of a job (“What is the Spiral of Silence?,” n.d., ¶2). For this theory to be plausible it relies on the idea that in a given situation we all possess a sort of intuitive way of knowing what the prevailing of knowing what the prevailing opinion happens to be. The spiral is created or reinforced when someone in the perceived opinion majority speaks out confidently in support of the majority opinion (Griffin, 2002, p. 375). This is why the minority begins to be more and more distanced from a place where they are comfortable to voice their opinion and begin to experience fear. The closer a person believes the opinion held is similar to the prevailing public opinion, the mo... ... middle of paper ... ...fear of rejection to express their opinion or views. They know what behaviors will make better likelihood. Being the part of the minority, people lose their confidence and silent or mute their views because of the fear of isolation or they just feel alone or unsupported. Sometimes the minorities will withdraw their expressed opinion from public debates to secure themselves from the majority. This is how I feel the Spiral of Silence theory applies to my real life story. The spiral of silence theory reflects a fundamental social psychology of individual’s cognition and behaviors. Human beings are fearful of being isolated, ignored, and excluded. Public opinion is not always as powerful as Neumann described. Many people conform to public opinions because of fear of isolation. They will not express their opinions when they perceive them as the minority opinion.
It often leads to people adjusting responses to stimuli just because they believe that if everyone else has the same response they must have it too. This is shown in "Asch Experiment" after McLeod explained how the dot of light never moved, he mentioned, "The participants are then asked to estimate how far the dot of light moves. These estimates are made out loud, and with repeated trials, each group of three converges on an estimate. The main finding of the study was that groups found their own "social norm" of perception." (McLeod 2) This shows that when placed in an environment where some people have a different opinion than others, the popular opinion takes over and everyone's opinion becomes uniform because people doubt themselves when they are alone on an opinion, leading to conformity. People in environments like this should try to keep their own opinions as to prevent the spread of conformity when uniqueness is
The avoidance group is people who we want to distance ourselves from. The author states that the reason we do this is because we want our behavior to be like the group wants us to be, and if anybody disagrees we stay away from them. The final group is We like to do it in groups. The first point is Phenomenon Deindividuation. Phenomenon Deindividuation is where a individual indentities becomes lost with in a group. The second point is Group shopping. Group shopping and behavior and home shoppong parties: People more likely to buy more when shopping in a group, where pressure to crnform may be intense (bandwagon effect). The reason we do this is because if we dont buy what everyone else is buying then we can become a outcast. The last part of the story is Conformity. Conformity is a change in beliefs or actions as a reaction to real or imagined group. The norms of conformity are unspoken rules that grovern many aspects of consumption. There are five factors that influence of conformity. They are: Cultural Pressures, Fear Of Deviance, Commitment, Group Unanimity, Size, and Expertise and finally Susceptibility to Interpersonal
It is clear that the film Prisoners of Silence holds many illustrations of concepts explained by Social Psychology. While the examples of belief perseverance and the confirmation bias are specifically pointed out here, one could find numerous others. This shows that one can examine situations and events occurring around and within one's own life and see Social Psychology at work.
...distractions. Taking time to observe and analyze the silence can bring something to the surface that could never be confronted in any other way. We need to embrace silence presented throughout life, for we will come out with more definitive, powerful voices.
When you’re silent, other people feel uncomfortable. They often try to fill the silence, so they reveal more about themselves and what they like to do. It’s actually a tactic that law enforcement uses to get people to confess. Quiet people listen to all the problems around them and can come up with the best solution to the problems. Problem solvers are very important or else we would just have problem, after problem, and it would never get anything done.
The tyrannies of silence can be described as, “cultural and individual silences that regulate social and individual visibility and undermine the likelihood of social change,” (The Tyrannies of Silence, slide 2). The idea that, if you are not the one doing the oppression then you are not responsible to act, is a very outdated idea. Bystanders are just as guilty for the negative acts that occur. Silence is a chain reaction; if one person does not do anything then the next person also feels not obligated to step in. Discrimination is one of the main topics where silence can be observed. As shown in the video by Tess Paras, ethnicity is often observed as a trait that is limiting (Paras, 0:43-1:10). As a society, we have set up ethnic stereotypes that limit people based on their ethnicity. In the music video by Tess Paras, she identifies common roles in shows such as, “over-sexed Asians, urban girl with flavor,” (Paras, 1:17-1:19). When people naturally follow these stereotypes, they think that they are doing nothing wrong. However, being silent about the “typical” roles associated with ethnicity creates the stigma that there is nothing wrong with it. Another major area of silence is gender stereotypes. When people silently obey to these stereotypes, it makes it more difficult to identify who is being hurt and who is benefiting from these silences (The Tyrannies of Silence, slide 5). In the TED talk, Tony
As human beings, we have a strong desire to be accepted by others. We engage in behavior based on what we assume those around us are engaging. We misinterpret the firsthand information we gain from observing other people’s behavior. People’s behavior sometimes spring from a desire to create an impression that is not a true reflection one’s own beliefs, which may lead to errors in judgment. When a majority of group members privately reject a norm but assume that most others accept it, they are engaging in pluralistic ignorance. (Gilovich, Keltner, Chen & Nisbett, 2013, p. 112) Pluralistic ignorance occurs whenever people act in ways that conflict with their private beliefs because of a concern for the social consequences.
Solomon Asch developed and ran an experiment regarding the power of conformity that affects most populations. Psychologists have been attempting to fully understand the mental workings behind why people are so easily pressured into following others for the longest time. The main focus of psychologists, is to figure and understand what the causes are behind social conformity. Numerous terms are brought up when studying conformity. The “unspoken rules or guidelines for behavior in a group” (Hock 293) are labeled as social norms. When individuals are placed in large groups, the tendency is to lean with whatever the majority of the group thinks. The regular behavior of the individual tends to readjust to appease the superior crowd.
Doris Lessing uses this to state that individuals will conform to the majority because of society’s pressures and lose individualism. Lessing uses the fact that because of western societies are well educated in different ways, free to make choices that this makes the individual, but people never think to look at their lives and see that they are no longer and individual because they are conforming to the pressures of society. She uses the fact that people often socialize with “like-minded” people often forces to make decisions that our peers make. She declares that, “We find our thinking changing because we belong to a group. It is the hardest thing in the world to maintain an individual dissident opinion, as a member of a group.” She goes on to review several experiments that involved conforming to groups.
Groupthink was coined by Janis and is defined as “a psychological phenomenon in which people strive for consensus within a group”(Cherry). So people will essentially forgo their beliefs to conform to the group to obtain harmony or if they don’t agree with a group idea they will simply keep quiet about it rather than challenge ideas. Janis classified eight different “symptoms” of groupthink. They are Illusions of invulnerability, which leads the members of the group to take part in risk-taking and become overly optimistic. Unquestioned beliefs, leads the members to ignore the possible aftermath that their decisions can make. Rationalizing, hinders members from recognizing warning signs and from reexamining their own beliefs. Stereotyping, leads the members of the group to criticize or write off any other group who may have differing opinions. Self-censorship, makes group members who may have differing opinions not disclose them to the group. "Mindguards",certain members of the group who are self-appointed censors that withhold information they find may disrupt group consensus. Illusions of unanimity, leads the members of the group to think that everyone believes the same things. Direct pressure, this is put on members to conform when they do end up expressing their own opinions or the rest of the group feels as if they are having differing opinions. Janis’s work was influential because it helped us examine the
The astute reader may notice that this review does not include any papers that did not find a false consensus effect. The reason for this is not that this paper is not representative of the literature, but rather, that it is. The uniformity of the literature suggests that the phenomenon is fairly common. Some interesting arguments as to why this is are motivational or cognitive in nature. The motivational premise is based in the idea that people are motivated to believe that they have a place in their social environment. This argument is a based in self-justification, in that if many people share a given belief or behavior, it makes it easier to justify that this attitude or behavior is either right, or not as bad as it might seem.
Affecting society can give an individual power. A positive effect can lead this particular event. As individuals say, “With great power, comes great responsibility.” With the responsibility given to nonconformists, they have to choose between abusing their power, or flourishing. Those who choose to abuse the given power, choose hatred. Society strongly disapproves of nonconformists, unless
Cain, Susan. Quiet: The Power of Introverts in a World That Can’t Stop Talking. New York: Crown Publishers, 2012. 10. Print.
Noelle-Neumann, E. (1974), The Spiral of Silence A Theory of Public Opinion. Journal of Communication, 24: 43–51.
In today’s society, Technology is the main player in the way we communicate. Cell phones and social media made the communication easier for people to contact each other. It extends time less to connect between long distance friends. Also, it helps people to spread and enlarge circle of friendships around the world. However, people are losing the way of face-to-face conversation. Sherry Turkle is an expert on culture and therapy, mobile technology, social networking, and sociable robotics argued in her article “the flight from conversation” how using technology can affect our behavior in conversation.