Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Impact of media on politics
Impact of media on politics
The role of journalism in politics
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Impact of media on politics
Public Opinion and Polling
Americans are showing signs of disaffection with a
presidential campaign that is just beginning. The public
thinks the press and large campaign contributors are
having too much influence on who gets nominated,
and a 60% majority thinks voters themselves have too
little say.
The latest Federal Election Commission, conducted
on the heels of protracted controversy about coverage
of alleged cocaine use by George W. Bush, found
public reservations about news coverage of most
"character issues" ranging from youthful drug use to
psychological counseling. The poll also shows only a
53% majority of Americans now saying that press scrutiny of political candidates is worth it and a
plurality rating political coverage as only fair or poor.
The response of the public is to tune out. Few are paying close attention to campaign news, while at
the same time an increasing number of people think the press is overcovering the campaigns. Not
surprisingly in this light, many Americans cannot even name a single candidate for the two parties'
nominations. Fully 37% of Federal Election Commission's respondents could not offer up the name of a GOP candidate, and
even more -- 50% -- could not name a Democratic candidate, without prompting.
Public inattention to the campaign is about the only hopeful sign in this survey for Al Gore's
candidacy. Opinion about the vice president is not improving. As in other recent nationwide surveys,
Gore continues to lag behind Bush in the general election matchup. This poll also shows his support
for the Democratic nomination softening.
These are the principal findings of a September 1-12, 1999,
Pew Research Center nationwide telephone poll of 1,205
adults...
... middle of paper ...
...t polarizing issue involves marital infidelity. Fully 57% of
Republicans say that if a candidate is having an affair during the campaign, news organizations should
almost always report on this. Only 30% of Democrats share this view.
Republicans are also tougher than Democrats on lying. Seven-in-ten GOP backers (71%) think the
media should always report if a candidate has exaggerated his or her military or academic record.
Among Democrats, a bare majority consider such stories newsworthy (52% and 53%, respectively).
Republicans are more likely than Democrats to say the press should pursue stories about past
marijuana use: 26% of Republicans vs. 17% of Democrats think this should always be reported.
However, when it comes to cocaine use, the two groups are largely in agreement -- 36% of
Republicans and 35% of Democrats consider this highly newsworthy.
For an example of the authors use of specific examples while describing what the media decides as news worthy the author writes, “The public rarely hears about the routine ceremonies at state dinners, but when President George Bush threw up all over the Japanese prime minister in 1992, the world’s media jumped on the story” (Edwards, Wattenberg, Lineberry, 2015, p. 398). This is an indication of how the media decides what is newsworthy. This quote demonstrates some of the strengths of the article because, not only does the quote support how the media decides what is news worthy, but it also shows no bias and is a factual, specific example. Another quote that demonstrates the strengths of the article is “Journalists and politicians have a symbiotic relationship, with politicians relying on journalists to get their message out and journalists relying on politicians to keep them in the know”. (p.400). this quote demonstrates the strengths of the article because, it shows how the media gets its news, how politicians gains their influence, and shows no bias. One last quote that emphasizes the strengths of this excerpt is “The media can even have a dramatic effect on how the public evaluates specific events by emphasizing one event over others. When during a 1976 presidential debate, President Ford incorrectly stated that the Soviet Union did
In theory, political campaigns are the most important culmination of the democratic debate in American politics. In practice, however, the media shrouds society’s ability to engage in a democratic debate with unenlightening campaign coverage. Because of this, it is difficult—if not impossible—to have educated political discourse in which the whole, factual truth is on display. After years of only seeing the drama of presidential campaigns, the American public has become a misinformed people.
Ever since the election season of 1972, presidential primaries have become “the dominant means of selecting the two major party candidates.”i[i] The primary system is one in which the eligible voters of each state do one of the following: 1) Vote for a presidential candidate to run for their party in the general election. 2) Vote for a delegate pledged to vote for a certain candidate at the party’s national convention. As intended, this process would bring the candidate selection processes out into the open and “let the people vote for the candidate of their choice.”ii[ii] On the surface, this may look very democratic (and admittedly, in some instances it was/is), but upon closer examination, it becomes overwhelmingly clear that the candidates are chosen long before the people cast their vote. The culprit: the structure of the presidential primary system.
Recently, the debate of whether bipartisanship has completely left this country incapacitated due to the lack of cooperation between Senators and House members with conflicting opinions has grown especially due to the Clinton Impeachment Debates. Many individuals feel that the only reason William Jefferson Clinton was impeached in the House was due to the fact that the majority of the House is republicans. This research proposal will attempt to define if the concept of bipartisanship does exist. If it does exist, what are the contributing factors to it (convincing individuals, convincing corporations, money, the Senators or House member’s families)? These can be considered to be the independent variables. Presently, the Internet consists of numerous, almost uncountable, sources on bipartisanship. Many magazines and newspapers are major contributors to this subject as well. The amount of scandal contributing to this particular issue creates a level of curiosity that intrigues all aspects of this society. When the public seems to want press on a particular issue, they seem to get it.
Some of the more recent, and grossly biased broadcasts, were from the 2008 and 2012 presidential elections. Historically, the Fox News Channel is known to lean heavily to the right, or on the Republican spectrum. President Barack Obama’s political party is widely known to the public as being democratic. Statistically, to this day according to studies over 17 million households receive some form of the Fox News Channel (Auletta). The Fox News Channel is published through a number of different channels to its viewers.
He is determined to keep George W. Bush from messing up what he has helped create in the last eight years. So again we are seeing the issue of the economy. We have also seen some negative ad campaigning by Gore. He released two ads that were aired prior to the start of the Republican National Convention. The ads accused Bush of restricting health care to children and allowing Texas to become the smog capital.
of the public, or they realize the suppression of voters after the damage has already been
In the last three decades, polls became an important instrument for the media, especially television networks, to determine who wins and who loses the election. Caprini conducted a study about the impact of the early prediction of a winner in the 1980 presidential race by the television networks. He observed that, shortly after 8 p.m. Eastern standard time, NBC announced that, according to its analysis of exit poll data, Ronald Reagan was to be the next president of the United States (Caprini, 1984, p. 866). That early call was controversial because the polls in many states were still open at the time and, in some of th...
Evidence: Wendell manually conducted an interview during the 2008 election and suggested that people were more politically engaged near election day. He termed this attitude as “media hype”, meaning people in reality are not politically engaged. Aside from this, he conducted a survey to determine the amount of people that classify themselves as being “political”. To his conclusions, he found out that the majority of people were “politically aware”; however, they obtained their information via the broadcast media. Hence, people are not necessarily developing their own opinions, rather they are following a cultural trend.
It is even used in other sources of media, such as movies for example. The movie Primary Colors portrayed an election turned horse race when it was noted that the Senator who the protagonist is working for is a caring, charismatic ladies-man, unfaithful to his marriage. The biggest scandal however, belongs to his competitor Picker who was seen as a cookie cutter shoe-in compared to the lecherous Senator. However when Picker’s past as a homosexual cocaine addict was made aware to Stanton’s team, it offered, light of the media, the end of his profitable career so the oppose withdrew from the race to protect his reputation. These types of portrayals of elections is not only limited to presidential races however, it can be done to “smaller” elections such as that of Senators. The headlines that make way to these elections once again focus on the political party of the candidate compared to that of the majority of the state/the people residing in it. It’s more focused on a Republican versus a Democrat and not so much what each candidate stands for. After all, Senators are not very well known, even more so due to the fact that there are numerous Senators in the whole
and others only vote for a party they feel has a real chance. This was
Political elites have a way of altering the media, and using the media as a weapon to get what they want, and most Americans are too ignorant to stop and analyze what’s going on and see the facts. The biggest vehicle that politicians use is the television, which is where Gore starts his book. Gore does an excellent job of selling television as a top contributor to the assault on reason, and this is because, unlike the newspaper or internet, television is a medium for the rich and powerful, because not just anyone can get on TV. Also, unlike the internet, television is a means in which elite politicians overload viewers with information passively, which means that people cannot have a two-way conversation, because to purchase airtime on television costs a pretty penny, and only the rich and powerful (political elites) have the money to get that kind of airtime. This is a
...rs must report on the side of their financial backers. Newspapers and nightly news shows tend not have the bi-partisan qualities that they claim to have.
Americans look to the press to provide the information they need to make informed political choices. How well the press lives up to its responsibility to provide this information has a direct impact upon Americans: how they think about and act upon the issues that confront them.
Polls have a role in political campaigns and shaping government policies but recently the reliability of polls have come into question. The Republican polls provided the information to Presidential candidate Mitt Romney that he had a strong chance of winning key battle ground states. The polls showed "he had at least 267 out of the 270 electoral votes needed to win the election" (Hoffman). When watching the election night returns the reality was Romney only received 206 Electoral College votes far away from the magic number needed to win or tie the national election. The candidate’s team used these polls and focused on states that showed a strong chance to gain votes. Romney focused his energy in Ohio and Pennsylvania, both states he eventually lost.